[rpms/slic3r] PR #13: Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog

2024-01-29 Thread Fabien Boucher

zuul commented on the pull-request: `Convert to %autorelease and 
%autochangelog` that you are following:
``
Build succeeded.
https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/00a475203c7b4ddf91316585ebd988f5

- [check-for-arches 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/7496df7f815c48de93c9ed6752c4fb66)
 : SUCCESS in 6m 11s
- [check-for-eln 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/66743faa02a9449a8c3c70664d70ec87)
 : SUCCESS in 18s
- [rpm-scratch-build 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/02199161aa3748a6b13a5f6458fd51dd)
 : SUCCESS in 23m 53s
- [rpm-scratch-build-s390x 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/4b2670fd2e6c4b5897ee71d02294a91c)
 : FAILURE in 7m 55s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-ppc64le 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/abfc8f2f233f4e8493860f47f4628835)
 : SUCCESS in 40m 57s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-i686 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/18b8bdc5be7d452daf1dfff8ef4e8a8c)
 : FAILURE in 7m 52s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-aarch64 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/7065c5641aaa406ea425aa4dc3fe0bd6)
 : SUCCESS in 20m 04s (non-voting)
- [rpm-linter 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/ee2cdb7e29a34615a258583a945f57e2)
 : SUCCESS in 6m 50s (non-voting)
- [rpm-rpminspect 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/cb0fbde73b7b4ad586561ec054aabd5b)
 : FAILURE in 10m 17s (non-voting)
- [check-for-sti-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/8bb3e559c9df487aa8cdcc474112ff69)
 : SUCCESS in 15s
- [check-for-fmf-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/98c88cefff914576ae8b41ddcd62d5e2)
 : SUCCESS in 15s
- [rpm-install-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/eefd7fad3ed14010bb42692815f25175)
 : SUCCESS in 2m 01s
Skipped 3 jobs

``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/13
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess] PR #2: Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog

2024-01-29 Thread Fabien Boucher

zuul commented on the pull-request: `Convert to %autorelease and 
%autochangelog` that you are following:
``
Build succeeded.
https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/5ae0717deecf41f2a502d27b5140486c

- [check-for-arches 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/0a3499db028849abbc31426858574226)
 : SUCCESS in 5m 53s
- [check-for-eln 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/d3ec56c1ed5f4f14936ec4c8cdb91f9a)
 : SUCCESS in 19s
- [rpm-scratch-build 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/c10359efba1f42338c293d93b48a2b08)
 : SUCCESS in 14m 27s
- [rpm-scratch-build-s390x 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/74784a394539498ab14b381dafbef86a)
 : SUCCESS in 8m 50s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-ppc64le 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/cad84a7e2366415dbd0bd62b85b4fa28)
 : SUCCESS in 12m 26s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-i686 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/4101fbbcc8a64596a11912ed0134c260)
 : SUCCESS in 16m 28s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-aarch64 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/d6582b7e77e8489c942e226dec8d7272)
 : SUCCESS in 8m 26s (non-voting)
- [rpm-linter 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/0870b354127c4cbe93560d2f436d199b)
 : SUCCESS in 10m 13s (non-voting)
- [rpm-rpminspect 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/190efe98e9eb43f8bf5e3525a6f256b1)
 : SUCCESS in 16m 03s (non-voting)
- [check-for-sti-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/2d8dcf5a4e5840bb9937dfd4331742d6)
 : SUCCESS in 18s
- [check-for-fmf-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/99c2a4ed9b5c45efb145bba3b3c57c20)
 : SUCCESS in 17s
- [rpm-install-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/953b947618824b619eb4ee34b3ff55ca)
 : SUCCESS in 1m 30s
Skipped 3 jobs

``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess/pull-request/2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[rpms/perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp] PR #1: Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog

2024-01-29 Thread Fabien Boucher

zuul commented on the pull-request: `Convert to %autorelease and 
%autochangelog` that you are following:
``
Build succeeded.
https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/cf2bf27b41aa4f709db2ce8c459ceaa1

- [check-for-arches 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/7a08448be5954ad7aef92aad22809b36)
 : SUCCESS in 6m 56s
- [check-for-eln 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/fba78a62a60d4d59b5102056a364c207)
 : SUCCESS in 20s
- [rpm-scratch-build 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/3b41badc68384cfab6dd02816c7165b4)
 : SUCCESS in 11m 47s
- [rpm-scratch-build-s390x 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/5fae911bc06a4d0fa2560f9ff5b9c21a)
 : SUCCESS in 8m 58s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-ppc64le 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/24e2b099ec4946df8a1c1f1aef6445b8)
 : SUCCESS in 22m 08s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-i686 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/97719dd6f62f470883aac0fb3c282205)
 : SUCCESS in 8m 50s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-aarch64 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/be02266d4a1b400497345ef9b2e12660)
 : SUCCESS in 14m 55s (non-voting)
- [rpm-linter 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/1c4d395c8f674029b38025f0a827c7fc)
 : SUCCESS in 10m 14s (non-voting)
- [rpm-rpminspect 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/c3f8536fbb544259a7ce2fef612cd6c0)
 : SUCCESS in 14m 37s (non-voting)
- [check-for-sti-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/361f6569b5554e24b860dc7a8ff05ff8)
 : SUCCESS in 15s
- [check-for-fmf-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/b4d0131c7aba45a1bc6de1d88ac9e07b)
 : SUCCESS in 15s
- [rpm-install-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/3e2e5a6e44f6890530219886e9ec)
 : SUCCESS in 1m 32s
Skipped 3 jobs

``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Build-WithXSpp/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[rpms/perl-Growl-GNTP] PR #1: Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog

2024-01-29 Thread Fabien Boucher

zuul commented on the pull-request: `Convert to %autorelease and 
%autochangelog` that you are following:
``
Build succeeded.
https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/38d17d49c2b743edb22bd4bb1903db8b

- [check-for-arches 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/c40bb98dcf924394a017b7071dd5824e)
 : SUCCESS in 3m 53s
- [check-for-eln 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/30bab1dd1fea44aa94789c22684d7748)
 : SUCCESS in 19s
- [rpm-scratch-build 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/4d2847994b864365a368b7b77fe9ae39)
 : SUCCESS in 12m 27s
- [rpm-scratch-build-s390x 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/9d3538ce5dec4b7c9642dabcc3877766)
 : SUCCESS in 9m 18s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-ppc64le 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/84a7ee2f861c4f098b8a82e9dd3b0275)
 : SUCCESS in 12m 26s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-i686 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/7a5d45aff8c74f99ac51b206e69207f6)
 : SUCCESS in 15m 13s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-aarch64 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/f46c246f3c5248a6af2e3b858da8747e)
 : SUCCESS in 9m 20s (non-voting)
- [rpm-linter 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/25773c0057714b809e77247e6ef50251)
 : SUCCESS in 10m 04s (non-voting)
- [rpm-rpminspect 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/b9f7ce103c004f71836c2c53494431f9)
 : SUCCESS in 7m 02s (non-voting)
- [check-for-sti-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/0c18607dff364b4fa17bfc5d8b8a0cc7)
 : SUCCESS in 18s
- [check-for-fmf-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/88cdc0da8ee64b88acc4d3a9acc62f32)
 : SUCCESS in 16s
- [rpm-install-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/f0744d92b69347b4ac52bcb692cec4d6)
 : SUCCESS in 1m 29s
Skipped 3 jobs

``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Growl-GNTP/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[rpms/perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default] PR #1: Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog

2024-01-29 Thread Fabien Boucher

zuul commented on the pull-request: `Convert to %autorelease and 
%autochangelog` that you are following:
``
Build succeeded.
https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/be94edeec1da42878737fbfdec387606

- [check-for-arches 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/16c890e166e845628d6fa7d40366ab06)
 : SUCCESS in 3m 51s
- [check-for-eln 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/6892683e567346da9252b8569ffde110)
 : SUCCESS in 20s
- [rpm-scratch-build 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/9f754af18b9d479fa4746a19c73787f5)
 : SUCCESS in 12m 19s
- [rpm-scratch-build-s390x 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/5a4273b358a945668ae1f2ede0574e37)
 : SUCCESS in 8m 16s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-ppc64le 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/795e00cf8f0645aea3bafb4bd6ff3086)
 : SUCCESS in 15m 52s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-i686 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/89d7de95a5c54f038d02045943d24c25)
 : SUCCESS in 13m 01s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-aarch64 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/d76e4fb81898410bb58719bf218dba09)
 : SUCCESS in 7m 51s (non-voting)
- [rpm-linter 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/5efd514a8f434a3db52d3a5ff438b9fa)
 : SUCCESS in 4m 29s (non-voting)
- [rpm-rpminspect 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/8b0007d14b60490c8d3e6d58f7b743ad)
 : SUCCESS in 8m 11s (non-voting)
- [check-for-sti-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/912724657f784eb89e78058a74988923)
 : SUCCESS in 17s
- [check-for-fmf-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/2602341b46d142fbb6f0dc04a17bfc36)
 : SUCCESS in 18s
- [rpm-install-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/f61cd80d027b455281562463bc9d3f50)
 : SUCCESS in 1m 29s
Skipped 3 jobs

``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Default/pull-request/1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas] PR #3: Convert to %autorelease and %autochangelog

2024-01-29 Thread Fabien Boucher

zuul commented on the pull-request: `Convert to %autorelease and 
%autochangelog` that you are following:
``
Build failed. More information on how to proceed and troubleshoot errors 
available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci
https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/b0d9fce13169459f9639816dbfc7e188

- [check-for-arches 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/eb4487f64b404b35b407ffc938fa395f)
 : SUCCESS in 6m 38s
- [check-for-eln 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/0c402998359f42818a0d28ff4b3222a2)
 : SUCCESS in 20s
- [rpm-scratch-build 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/fd808a77425141828ce47557ca47cc3c)
 : FAILURE in 11m 52s
- [rpm-scratch-build-s390x 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/a89a367093064b068f0396e90e1256a5)
 : FAILURE in 14m 29s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-ppc64le 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/16b26507565d4930bdc6f00705487e9d)
 : FAILURE in 17m 47s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-i686 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/cd30bedb421d47bc8b464486eb831e9c)
 : FAILURE in 15m 30s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-aarch64 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/7cad33cbf65740da9fcb879880d6c364)
 : FAILURE in 9m 35s (non-voting)
- [rpm-linter 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/4304a9cde0994f0ca69d70a4314b99c9)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build (non-voting)
- [rpm-rpminspect 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/66576c9832db44338c0307a6cbf470eb)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build (non-voting)
- [check-for-sti-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/9f960f0cf0db437bace30404c86b79a9)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build
- [check-for-fmf-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/ed11910bfba146538a05735f58d584ad)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build
- [rpm-install-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/24cd8dee27ad4e01bdbee7c9d4f7ac31)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build
- [rpm-tmt-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/561edcd9cd454861a370ff3189289701)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build
- [rpm-sti-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/5374431acc8a4ef49f59185b3969fd24)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build
Skipped 1 job

``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[rpms/slic3r] PR #12: Fix FTBFS with GCC 14

2024-01-22 Thread Fabien Boucher

zuul commented on the pull-request: `Fix FTBFS with GCC 14` that you are 
following:
``
Build failed. More information on how to proceed and troubleshoot errors 
available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci
https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/buildset/dca1d86adb24405aac7a9c2dc3a7e9a3

- [check-for-arches 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/62e99835d92c477fac66aeb1f07bf057)
 : SUCCESS in 2m 16s
- [check-for-eln 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/025943bd22b648a78c5b8273ed0450e0)
 : SUCCESS in 16s
- [rpm-scratch-build 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/8eecc7198e2a467b9cc797a797e2e0f4)
 : POST_FAILURE in 25m 04s
- [rpm-scratch-build-s390x 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/77a025fd6216475d92f7f40cf703b803)
 : FAILURE in 10m 53s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-ppc64le 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/87e3f2d536c545709e7c3baaa8479aaf)
 : SUCCESS in 32m 30s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-i686 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/4d95dd11dc1b451fb961c20fc3e87303)
 : FAILURE in 13m 06s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-aarch64 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/c80442aaa8724d6ab7f735c16ed48d7d)
 : SUCCESS in 34m 25s (non-voting)
- [rpm-linter 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/6dec9dd44247420fa1c7616e239f13e0)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build (non-voting)
- [rpm-rpminspect 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/03c0075ba8ad4772bc509cdcba8bd49a)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build (non-voting)
- [check-for-sti-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/f12e1babc58043e4831b2bad79f9aada)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build
- [check-for-fmf-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/2c36ae48ab684582808afaede1ae70f4)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build
- [rpm-install-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/1633b5207bd9425ea68b48f3a87dd71d)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build
- [rpm-tmt-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/70d76e38e07e4b89be8994ee646dfdad)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build
- [rpm-sti-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/4229ddf069a34865a4b78295a371baae)
 : SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job rpm-scratch-build
Skipped 1 job

``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/slic3r/pull-request/12
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas] PR #2: Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2

2023-01-25 Thread Fabien Boucher

zuul commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are 
following:
``
Build succeeded.

- [check-for-arches 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/5bea016a9e2e4e4eb314562c394638d9)
 : SUCCESS in 1m 30s
- [rpm-scratch-build 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/de81cdcceb6d4752aad022e0f60b3da1)
 : SUCCESS in 12m 44s
- [rpm-scratch-build-s390x 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/9a50ee89e13d47d4b3e66e9d15edef1e)
 : SUCCESS in 10m 44s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-ppc64le 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/e70f56921f664fce975eff4a455a7a70)
 : SUCCESS in 10m 13s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-i686 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/8623356417e34ece90cff2422b5aa979)
 : SUCCESS in 11m 43s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-aarch64 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/7f230ee9ddc24702bb9733e069c3fc49)
 : SUCCESS in 8m 40s (non-voting)
- [rpm-linter 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/75348e3396bc4072b7da1ad9161f52de)
 : SUCCESS in 3m 39s (non-voting)
- [rpm-rpminspect 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/f72ef6dd1c4f464b870765b24529df68)
 : SUCCESS in 4m 32s (non-voting)
- [check-for-sti-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/d4a87cc6f51944249d9efec151e43484)
 : SUCCESS in 1m 36s
- [check-for-fmf-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/cb438327634144659b75bad6a836902b)
 : SUCCESS in 1m 44s
- [rpm-install-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/2e56123b5a124ea5b53a4fdfac5c54ac)
 : SUCCESS in 3m 15s
- [rpm-tmt-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/69ef325030bf4379a39e9bf58310812d)
 : SKIPPED
- [rpm-sti-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/762dd854b01e4b999f3bb2f3e4a35ab5)
 : SKIPPED

``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas] PR #2: Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2

2023-01-21 Thread Fabien Boucher

zuul commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are 
following:
``
Build failed. More information on how to proceed and troubleshoot errors 
available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci

- [check-for-arches 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/d14fdac5665d43269149326cc68e7f6e)
 : SUCCESS in 55s
- [rpm-scratch-build 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/caf8234e6c1e4e69909229d71014c246)
 : FAILURE in 11m 03s
- [rpm-scratch-build-s390x 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/8c117515ccd447908e065f5dd45eef2c)
 : FAILURE in 8m 59s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-ppc64le 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/edd9358e58604ff19679e195647aa4f9)
 : FAILURE in 12m 54s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-i686 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/b5d79d3c3afd403da58eebf6f4ba3e69)
 : FAILURE in 10m 59s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-aarch64 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/5188f63a8e3841e6a5fef13abddd011c)
 : FAILURE in 10m 57s (non-voting)
- [rpm-linter 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/9301bc003bc946038904b6f6ecca16d4)
 : SKIPPED (non-voting)
- [rpm-rpminspect 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/f628889c98f046b6a80c39007571ae0e)
 : SKIPPED (non-voting)
- [check-for-sti-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/959a3bddd2804093a3c73fca00e55fc1)
 : SKIPPED
- [check-for-fmf-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/48ac369b954b422eb96461247d76e741)
 : SKIPPED
- [rpm-install-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/660e71fc41a04e948fde53357dbbdb01)
 : SKIPPED
- [rpm-tmt-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/7c262e3f67174ffdbfd632955392270a)
 : SKIPPED
- [rpm-sti-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/81fee7a87aa1484c9f8e389507db40f2)
 : SKIPPED

``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


[rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas] PR #2: Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2

2023-01-19 Thread Fabien Boucher

zuul commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.2` that you are 
following:
``
Build failed. More information on how to proceed and troubleshoot errors 
available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci

- [check-for-arches 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/a108cc22f50e42808f8aab5467126f5e)
 : SUCCESS in 55s
- [rpm-scratch-build 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/a45637bab61d494cb2a7404ffa80f269)
 : FAILURE in 15m 01s
- [rpm-scratch-build-s390x 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/b01d85345acf400da70fcc724817a2eb)
 : FAILURE in 8m 57s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-ppc64le 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/65e347f689074eb2848a00010af0b5fe)
 : FAILURE in 27m 03s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-i686 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/b9c70fe37d67480383ffd8b286327ad0)
 : FAILURE in 8m 08s (non-voting)
- [rpm-scratch-build-aarch64 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/e046d1ad585f4a06822f0c69cb364645)
 : FAILURE in 6m 54s (non-voting)
- [rpm-linter 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/a507bd6f328444c99191d5842d40055b)
 : SKIPPED (non-voting)
- [rpm-rpminspect 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/d2bbabcecd964384a9d85a40a45fc581)
 : SKIPPED (non-voting)
- [check-for-sti-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/88526d56a24b49f182eea79eb74131d9)
 : SKIPPED
- [check-for-fmf-tests 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/d1901368c5864769b02b4b49d3df6493)
 : SKIPPED
- [rpm-install-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/758a032622f94db8aacee337d749f971)
 : SKIPPED
- [rpm-tmt-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/ac40d8d22c6e4ea3a3db51ca318a6119)
 : SKIPPED
- [rpm-sti-test 
](https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/build/76945d1a4b704fd6b24b6eca372a6868)
 : SKIPPED

``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx-GLCanvas/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Changes to Zuul CI - rpm-linter job (RPMLint 2.2.0)

2022-08-05 Thread Fabien Boucher
Hello,

Note related to packages attached to the Zuul CI.

This change [1], when merged, will set the container image to run rpmlint
on Fedora 36. RPMLint version will be 2.2.0. Currently, the rpm-linter job
uses a Fedora 34 container image with rpmlint 1.11.

This change might impact your rpmlint configuration. I plan to merge this
change [1] next Friday.

This lets some time to validate/update your rpmlint configuration. To do
so, add the following line into the "initial" comment of a new PR to
validate speculatively the CI for your package:

Depends-on: https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs/pull-request/157

If the rpm-linter job is "success" then that's fine you can close the PR.
In case of failure this PR could be used to update your rpmlint
configuration (such as rpmlintrc files).

Regards

[1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs/pull-request/157
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Orphaned Zuul package

2022-06-21 Thread Fabien Boucher
Hi,

Just to inform you that I've just orphaned the Zuul package. Feel free to
take over it if you'd like.

Deploying Zuul via container images seems the best solution for the moment.
Upstream project provides container images: https://hub.docker.com/u/zuul

A k8s operator is also available: https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-operator

Regards,
Fabien
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: More distgit attached to Fedora Zuul CI

2021-02-19 Thread Fabien Boucher
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:56 AM Ondrej Mosnacek  wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:29 PM Pierre - Yves Chibon
>  wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > On 09. 02. 21 15:27, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > > > Has there been any more discussion about disabling simple-koji-ci on
> > > > packages with Zuul enabled?
> > >
> > > It's generally disabled AFAIK. Or broken. Same outcome.
> >
> > AFAIK it's still running. Happy to decommission it though.
>
> I think in one pull request, I saw simple-koji-ci being able to
> generate the source tarball (presumably from the Source: URL) -> SRPM
> -> start the build even when the tarball hadn't yet been uploaded to
> the lookaside cache. Fedora CI wasn't able to do that at that time
> (probably still can't) and Zuul CI wasn't enabled on that repo back
> then.
>
> Was I just imagining things or does simple-koji-ci really have that
> feature? If yes, does/will Zuul CI provide the same?
>
>

I can't say for simple-koji-ci, but regarding Zuul the default jobs
workflow is:

1: rpm-scratch-build: build a srpm from the PR, submit the srpm to Koji to
run a scratch build,
finally store the built rpms in a public storage

Once 1 is finished, and in parallel:
2: rpmlint: run rpmlint command on built rpms
3: rpminspect: run rpminspect command on built rpms
4: rpm-install-test: install the built rpms on the target system
5: rpm-test (if STI tests inside the PR/distgit): run the STI tests

In addition, if the package produces architecture specific binaries, then
Zuul runs additional
scratch-build jobs such as rpm-scratch-build-[s390x, ...], that are skipped
if fully noarch.
This can be seen here [1] and here [2].

[1]:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-gear/pull-request/41#comment-68067
[2]:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-latest-openjdk/pull-request/45#comment-68054
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


More distgit attached to Fedora Zuul CI

2021-02-09 Thread Fabien Boucher
Hi Folks,

We are going to add a new bundle of distgits to Fedora Zuul CI. This bundle
[1]
has been computed from datagrapper to get the list of distgits that received
at least 2 PR updates since the last 3 months.

Here [2] is the Pull-Request we are going to merge, in the coming days, into
the Zuul configuration.

Like for the previous bundles of distgits we added, we will notify, by
email,
maintainers that a CI has been attached to their packages.

More information about FZCI in the wiki page [3].

Previous bundles we added: [4].

Please let us know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,
Fabien

[1]: https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1942/
[2]: https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/130
[3]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci
[4]:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/K6US7R6GUGGIID6S4PYMQGREUKL45QAW/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: More distgit attached to Fedora Zuul CI ?

2020-11-30 Thread Fabien Boucher
Hi Folks,

We are going to add a new list of distgit to Fedora Zuul CI. The
openstack-sig [1] group would like to benefit from this CI for the packages
they maintain.
Here [2] is the Pull-Request we are going to merge with these new distgits
[3].

Like for the previous bundle of distgits we added, we will notify, by
email, maintainers that a CI has been attached to their packages.

Regards,
Fabien

[1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/group/openstack-sig
[2]: https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/119
[3]: https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1899/

On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:40 AM Fabien Boucher  wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I'm forwarding a mail I sent to the Fedora CI mailing list last week, as
> it might interest some folks on that mailing list too.
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/c...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/7CK45NW5IDXU646AO5QPN2G7FEFOR5Y7/
>
> ---
>
> As you may know we provide Zuul CI [1] for some Fedora projects and
> packages [2],[3]. We are running this CI For Fedora for more than one year
> and we see that the platform and jobs are pretty stable. This CI is part of
> a wider CI platform that the Software Factory project is maintaining for
> various projects like RDO [4]. We have some free capacity and we would like
> to provide more CI to Fedora especially for distgit repos.
>
> Since a previous improvement [5], attaching a distgit repository to Fedora
> Zuul CI is easier and does not require any project maintainer action.
>
> A Pull-Request is proposed here [6] to activate the CI on 148 distgit
> repos (the sorted list of the distgit names is here [7]). Each distgit part
> of this list has received at least 2 new PRs during the last two months
> (source datagrepper).
>
> So we would like to know if Fedora maintainers and contributors will be
> happy to get Zuul CI feedback on those repositories ?
> Here is an example of a run of the default distgit CI jobs for
> rpms/python3.10 [8].
>
> Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?
>
> We will be glad to include more repositories to that list regularly.
>
> Regards,
> Fabien
>
> 1 - https://zuul-ci.org/
> 2 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci
> 3 - https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status
> 4 - https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status
> 5 -
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/c...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/7SZGJCIFOATZJ3KJYOBQMUG4SMAYAGGU/
> 6 - https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff
> 7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/
> 8 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10/pull-request/9
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


More distgit attached to Fedora Zuul CI ?

2020-11-09 Thread Fabien Boucher
Hi folks,

I'm forwarding a mail I sent to the Fedora CI mailing list last week, as it
might interest some folks on that mailing list too.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/c...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/7CK45NW5IDXU646AO5QPN2G7FEFOR5Y7/

---

As you may know we provide Zuul CI [1] for some Fedora projects and
packages [2],[3]. We are running this CI For Fedora for more than one year
and we see that the platform and jobs are pretty stable. This CI is part of
a wider CI platform that the Software Factory project is maintaining for
various projects like RDO [4]. We have some free capacity and we would like
to provide more CI to Fedora especially for distgit repos.

Since a previous improvement [5], attaching a distgit repository to Fedora
Zuul CI is easier and does not require any project maintainer action.

A Pull-Request is proposed here [6] to activate the CI on 148 distgit repos
(the sorted list of the distgit names is here [7]). Each distgit part of
this list has received at least 2 new PRs during the last two months
(source datagrepper).

So we would like to know if Fedora maintainers and contributors will be
happy to get Zuul CI feedback on those repositories ?
Here is an example of a run of the default distgit CI jobs for
rpms/python3.10 [8].

Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?

We will be glad to include more repositories to that list regularly.

Regards,
Fabien

1 - https://zuul-ci.org/
2 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci
3 - https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status
4 - https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status
5 -
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/c...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/7SZGJCIFOATZJ3KJYOBQMUG4SMAYAGGU/
6 - https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff
7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/
8 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10/pull-request/9
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-04-06 Thread Fabien Boucher
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 9:11 PM Adam Williamson
 wrote:
>
> I also hope there will be an opportunity for discussion (with input
> from the community) of whether those requirements can be fulfilled in
> some way *other* than using a non-free Gitlab product. To take the
> 'merge train' example - as Neal and I have mentioned, Pagure now in
> fact *does* have some impressive capabilities in this area, thanks to
> the Pagure<->Zuul integration that the Software Factory folks have been
> working on, and presented at Devconf. I am personally using this for
> multiple projects, and blogged about it here:
>
> https://www.happyassassin.net/2020/02/12/using-zuul-ci-with-pagure-io/
>

As far as I understand the "merge train" feature from Gitlab, it seems to be
similar to Zuul's "speculative merging" feature, except that Zuul is
multi-repository aware by design, and thus Zuul is able to gate changes
in their order of approval across a logical (user defined) set of repositories.

When a project's code is spread across multiple repositories then Zuul's
approach is invaluable. A striking example of a project spanning multiple
repositories is of course Fedora where all packages are in their own
dist-git repository.

Another feature offered by Zuul that might be relevant in the dist-git context
is the ability to have Zuul test PRs that require other (still unmerged) PRs.
This allows creating CI jobs capable of handling build and runtime
dependencies of RPMs.


> an obvious avenue to explore here would be "can we work with Software
> Factory folks to do a similar integration between Gitlab Core and
> Zuul"? On the face of it, that would offer a way to achieve these
> capabilities in a fully F/OSS way.
>

As for Gitlab integration, a driver is available for Zuul, but it is
not as feature
complete compared to the other drivers like the Pagure one. It might take
some time to cover the missing bits; it might also be necessary to submit
feature requests to gitlab's APIs themselves. I have been involved in writing
those drivers and I fear it might not be as "easy" as it was for the Pagure
driver. I might be wrong, but I don't expect any support from the gitlab side,
for an obvious reason: offering "free" integration with Zuul would effectively
kill their effort on monetizing "merge train", a similar in-house feature.

On the other hand, I'd like to point out that working with Pagure maintainers to
discuss missing features (mainly API endpoints) was really productive.
Pagure folks are welcoming and provide guidance so it was easy for me
to implement most of the missing pieces in the code to integrate with Zuul.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-10-03 Thread Fabien Boucher
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:20 PM Neal Gompa  wrote:

>
> Unfortunately, it doesn't scale for the large number of packages we
> have. Pull requests would work if we had mergify[1] working on
> Dist-Git, otherwise I can't see how it'd work.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/Mergifyio/mergify-engine
>
>

Since some months we (the team that maintain softwarefactory-project.io and
review.rdoproject.org) are working on making Zuul [1] compatible with
Pagure in order to implement a packager workflow through Zuul's jobs around
the Pull Request model.
Zuul is a powerful gating system, scalable, that support cross-repository
jobs and artifacts sharing between jobs out of the box. Zuul's jobs are
Ansible playbooks.

We managed to do great progress that we shown at last Flock. We are
tracking the progress in this EPIC [2].
Here is how a project is configured: [3], the template is defined like so:
[4], and here the job definition of rawhide-rpm-scratch-build: [5]

Zuul's jobs configuration is flexible and we can provide templates that fit
different needs, whether the packager want a full workflow (from the
scratch build, various validation jobs such as linting/rpminspect to the
regular build) or just the scratch build.

We will soon propose this as an opt-in service for the interested
packagers. CI resources capacity will come from softwarefactory-project.io.


[1]: https://zuul-ci.org/
[2]: https://teams.fedoraproject.org/project/ci/epic/14
[3]:
https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs-config/blob/master/f/zuul.d/projects.yaml#_5
[4]: https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs/blob/master/f/zuul.d/templates.yaml
[5]: https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs/blob/master/f/zuul.d/jobs.yaml#_1
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-27 Thread Fabien Boucher
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:56 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:

> Yes. I've em-mailed you about the problem when it was happening, asking
> you to
> disable it, there was no reply and I managed to build it at the end.
>
>
So, I apologize. I missed your email.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Defining the future of the packager workflow in Fedora

2019-09-27 Thread Fabien Boucher
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 12:03 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:

> I remember that during the Python 3.8 rebuilds in the side tag, one
> package had
> this automated somehow already. I was bumping the release/changelog and
> trying
> to build it in the side tag at least 5 times, but I was building with
> --background, so the automation always got the NEVR in Koji first.
>
>
I guess it is python-gear ? Where I'm experimenting some automation based
on Zuul CI.
There is a job triggered to build in Koji when master ref change. This job
can be trigger
instead when a PR is closed/merged, that way direct push will not trigger a
build.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Self introduction: Fabien Boucher

2015-05-18 Thread Fabien Boucher
Hello Folks,

I've submitted two requests for review here:

- Zuul : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220451
- python-gear : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215046

As these are my two first packages I give you some quick information about me.
I'm Fabien boucher, software engineer, from Paris. Today I'm working around the
Openstack community. I'm mostly interested by python programming,
the scalable systems and Continous Integration's practice.

Since some months I contribute to a project [1] that try to ease the deployment
of a CI stack based on Gerrit/Zuul/Jenkins and CentOS images. Zuul is an 
important
component for such a stack but it is not packaged for Fedora neither for CentOS 
so
I would love to have it embedded in Fedora. I guess having Zuul packaged will 
also
benefit to Fedora users that want to build their own CI architecture.

I guess I need some help from reviewers for packages mentioned above :)
Thanks in advance for your help !

[1]: https://github.com/enovance/software-factory

Cheers,
Fabien Boucher
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct