@ Samuel Rakitničan
Please re-send your massages and send later massages to below thread, thanks:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/RM6SFL22AYOLZEFIO7IYHZPF72NFTWMS/
___
devel mailing list --
Please send massages to below thread, thanks:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/RM6SFL22AYOLZEFIO7IYHZPF72NFTWMS/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I forgot to say, it was between the hours 15-16 of 2 march (in local time) that
I sent two e-mails to mentioned threads, but nor my e-mails and others e-mails
was visible until 3 march 13:30-14:00. so it is actually 22-23 hours delay.
___
devel mailing
On Sat, 2018-03-03 at 18:30 +0100, Timotheus Pokorra wrote:
> Hello Farhad,
>
> > https://www.spinics.net/lists/fedora-devel/threads.html#241887
> >
> > Please do something for this problem, it is really bad situation
> > you
> > are waiting for e-mails and check the web page several times but
>
I forgot to say, it was between the hours 15-16 of yesterday (in local
time) that I sent two e-mails to mentioned threads, but nor my e-mail
and others e-mails was visible until today 13:30-14:00. so it is
actually 22-23 hours delay.
___
devel mailing
I forgot to say, it was between the hours 15-16 of yesterday (in local
time) that I sent two e-mails to mentioned threads, but nor my e-mail
and others e-mails was visible until today 13:30-14:00. so it is
actually 22-23 hours delay.
___
devel mailing
At few days ago I did open two threads:
1: "Fedora 26 & 27 are unable to boot with normal graphic mode on this
PC with AMD/ATI RS740 [Radeon 2100] GPU" in "Users"
https://www.spinics.net/linux/fedora/fedora-users/threads.html#481765
2. "Why size of repositories metadata is too high in Fedora?"
On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 14:46 +, chicago wrote:
> Good question. What is in this 20+58MB? Is it all text? Does most of
> it it change infrequently?/Maybe we can diff it?
I don't know, I just ran "dnf upgrade" and it took metadata in
mentioned size, Fedora developers should answer to these
On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 14:46 +, chicago wrote:
> Good question. What is in this 20+58MB? Is it all text? Does most of
> it it change infrequently?/Maybe we can diff it?
I don't know, I just ran "dnf upgrade" and it took metadata in
mentioned size, Fedora developers should answer to these
Hello, in Debian (9, stable), size of all the official repositories metadata is
maximum 10MB,
while in Fedora, today I ran "dnf update" for first time after installing
Fedora 27 (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-27-1.6) and it took 20+58MB for two
official repositories!
It is really too high,
I believe that everyone comes from MS Windows to Linux will need to YAST,
currently it provides many modules that makes system management very easy:
* service management, what services are running, what are stopped, and user can
change their status.
* systemd control
* hardware configuration
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 07:04:57AM -0000, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
>
> You seem to have missed this in Adam's email
No, I don't missed anything.
> i) just getting things right so we don't need a giant pile of
> configuration tools
> ii) tools written at more appropri
> On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 04:05 +0000, Farhad Mohammadi Majd wrote:
> Because we think it's fundamentally a wrong approach.
>
> It's not really a question of resources, but of not thinking this is
> the correct approach.
What is the correct approach?! Wasting lots of time on
Hello, SUSE distributions have a system control panel that can configure many
aspects of the system. It is the best feature I saw in SUSE, it is very
interesting, useful and beneficial for all users.
* Why Fedora does not have such tool?
* How much money is need to develop such tool from
Your description was complete and convincing. That link you did provide is only
12.0MB !! it is really acceptable. Thank you
Fedora, Red Hat and RPM are really great!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
Does Delta RPM is available only for the last installed version of software?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I had firefox-52.0-6.fc25 and there was no Delta RPM for firefox-52.0.2-2.fc25
Does Delta RPM is available only for the installed recent version?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
17 matches
Mail list logo
