Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 28. 08. 24 v 12:38 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> > Please exclude pythran:
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pythran/pull-request/31
> > Ack. Excluded. (But still included in the files below)
> > Also, could you please send a plain list of packages you plan to cha
Gwyn Ciesla wrote:
> libreoffice is done.
> inkscape, sadly, uses the unstable API and fails:
> In file included from /usr/include/poppler/Object.h:44,
> from /usr/include/poppler/GfxState.h:41,
> from /usr/include/poppler/Gfx.h:40,
> from
> /buil
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 11:57 PM Adam Williamson
>
> You are right - I meant to say it was suspicious that these commits
> were only done in the f40 branch, but are not present in rawhide.
> Usually packages are worked on in rawhide *first* and then changes are
> merged or backported to stable
> Fabio Valentini venit, vidit, dixit 2024-06-14 16:25:56:
>
> Julia comes from a mindset or background where reproducibility is
> important. Think of data science where you distribute both analysis and
> code and want your code to always support your analysis ;-)
>
> Now, one thing is enabling t
Is there a full log somewhere? I don't see it on
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/, and the usual links at the top of the
summary email aren't there this time.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to d
What if I don't use GNOME search? I don't use the GNOME desktop, so I don't
want to have a random Firefox process running on my machine that is doing
absolutely nothing and just hogging resources. Is this process only created
when something tries to talk to it on the DBus socket, or is it always
> Dne 05. 01. 24 v 11:10 Milan Crha napsal(a):
>
>
> There certainly were these changes:
>
> https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/commit/0560a3a63dfdd6642724c8fad4db9dc...
>
> https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-ng/commit/6592accb2541aa637844cabef16b7ad...
>
>
> Vít
I don't think zlib-ng is the ro
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 11:08 AM Aoife Moloney wrote:
> Wiki ->
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Linker_Error_On_Security_Issues
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. Thi
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 2:06 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Well it looks like I took too long to do the deferral to F40, and so
> FESCO dropped the change:
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3059#comment-875144
>
> So now do I need to re-submit as a fresh change for F40?
>
My reading of the email rep
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 6:39 AM Gwyn Ciesla via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Libcmis 0.6.0 is coming to rawhide, and libreoffice-TexMaths,
> openoffice.org-diafilter, python-paperwork-backend, and libreoffice are
> being rebuild against it.
>
>
Thanks for taking care of this, bu
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 11:59 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Recently, one of the folks working on packaging stuff in Fedora KDE
> nearly missed an issue caused by GCC emitting a warning about missing
> include dirs:
>
> > cc1plus: warning: /usr/include/qt6/QtCore/6.5.3: No such file or
> di
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 7:50 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> Minutes:
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-21/fesco.2023-09-21-17.03.html
> Minutes (text):
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2023-09-21/fesco.2023-09-21-17.03.tx
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023, 09:24 Michael J Gruber, wrote:
> Am Mi., 13. Sept. 2023 um 23:29 Uhr schrieb Neal Gompa >:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:24 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 11:19 PM Steven A. Falco <
> stevenfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > A quest
On Thu, 14 Sep 2023, 00:17 Neal Gompa, wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 7:02 PM Steven A. Falco
> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/13/23 05:23 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > Right. And I want to stress we are not dropping support for X11
> > > applications. Anything running as an X client in a desktop should wo
I think it is actually because of a change proposal, there was a recent
email about the webkit2gtk4.0 package changing:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IFRPWZNEFEGXGQFRNTH4LTFFLTJ5DOCL/,
so it is actually a problem I think.
-Ian
On Mon, Aug 21,
On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 11:12 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This is a status update for
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB
>
> The tbb2020.3 compat package has now been added to rawhide:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-15ccd1cedb
>
> It doesn't include the
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 3:25 AM Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
> On ke, 26 huhti 2023, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 9:04 AM Alexander Bokovoy
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This morning I woke up to find that packages I maintain were orphaned
> >> out of blue. Nobody contacted t
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:21 AM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, 10:28 Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>> On 13. 04. 23 10:18, Sébastien Le Roux wrote:
>> > Dear all,
>> > yesterday I created my first package repository:
>> >
>> > https://src.fedoraproje
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 2:35 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 at 08:24, Ian McInerney via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:39 PM Stephen Smoogen
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:39 PM Stephen Smoogen
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 9 Apr 2023 at 20:19, Ian McInerney via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:16 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/9/23 16
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:16 AM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 4/9/23 16:05, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> > I decided to put F38 onto my new machine from the start (so a clean
> > install), and now it seems to have some errors with DNF/RPM that I
> > haven't seen befo
I decided to put F38 onto my new machine from the start (so a clean
install), and now it seems to have some errors with DNF/RPM that I haven't
seen before on F37 when I tried the same thing.
Specifically, I am trying to install packages from a 3rd-party repository
(the Intel oneAPI repo), and it i
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 5:07 AM wrote:
The GCC spec file already contains
Provides: g++ = %{version}-%{release}
and doing a `dnf install g++` does try to install gcc-c++. So please be
specific about the error you are seeing and provide more information, and
especially why you say this is requir
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:24 PM Benson Muite
wrote:
> Would like to unretire Include What You Use
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175012
Taken,
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:21 PM Felix Wang wrote:
> Thanks for your advice. I tried and it can be built with no error, but
> when installing built contour package, it shows the following error:
> ```
> Error:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides libContourTerminalDisplay.so()(
Upstream appears to be disabling position independent code for some reason
in the crispy-core library:
https://github.com/contour-terminal/contour/blob/master/src/crispy/CMakeLists.txt#L100
(although they are using no-pie, which is odd since it is a library and I
would have expected no-pic instead,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 6:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F39ModernizeTBB
>
> This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
> process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
> community feedback. This proposal will only be implem
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 2:30 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2023, Brandon Nielsen via devel wrote:
>
> > On 2/8/23 9:30 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> >> wxGTK should have that...
> >
> > It should, and they fixed it, but the fix never made it to the 3.1.X
> series
> > as far as I can t
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 5:42 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on updating the opencasecade package[1] but the main downloads
> require a login.
>
>
Is there a specific reason it needs to be their premade tarballs? If not,
it looks like you should be able to pull the tarball from the tag in th
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> I just had a chance to check out a bug[1] recently submitted against
> trustedqsl and it appears that a new version of wxGTK with a SONAME bump
> was built for f37+ but not all dependencies rebuilt.
>
>
This was announced back in July while F
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 4:14 PM Fabio Valentini
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been collecting data about the dependency graph of Rust packages
> in Fedora for over a year now, and I would like to start the process
> of removing some accumulated cruft. In particular, I've been keeping
> track of which
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 7:45 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 2:05 PM Maxwell G via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know how to reach prodsec about this?
>
> I'll reach out to the people I know and see what the best way to get
> them in this conversation is.
>
>
Has this conversat
On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 12:02 PM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> While it is annoying to spell out each file it does catch package changes
> which might go unnoticed otherwise. In particular, we've had a few
> unannounced soname changes and such lately. [Disclaimer: I have not checked
> whether the main
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 3:07 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> Switching upstream has increased the .so version from libid3tag.so.0 to
> libid3tag.so.0.16.2
> I plan to do the rebuilds myself after checking everything builds ok in
> copr.
>
>
> Affected packages
>
> Fedora:
> audacity-0:3.1.3-5.fc37.x86_6
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 1:08 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:46 AM Merlin Cooper
> wrote:
> >
> > I like this policy, but it strikes me as odd that the packagers' email
> > addresses are posted publicly on the Pagure tickets... Wouldn't that
> > make it easier for spammers to ge
I'll take it and review it. I don't have any ones to swap currently.
-Ian
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:09 PM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095717
>
> This is an optional dependency of notmuch, the mail indexer. sfsexp
> enhances notmuch's capabilities cons
There hasn't been an update to the fedora-obsolete-packages package after
the upgrade testing that was done last month in preparation for the release
of F36. There are currently 3 open bugs that are targetted against F36 [1,
2, 3]. Since we are entering the final freeze this week, can someone make
On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 3:20 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 12. 03. 22 v 15:15 José Abílio Matos napsal(a):
>
> On Saturday, 12 March 2022 11.23.11 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> > Error:
>
> > Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
>
> > libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of
I noticed in the electron thread that we now have FFMPEG 5.0 in the
official Fedora repos, but this will of course mean that certain codecs are
removed due to legal concerns. This prompts a few questions though:
1) How are these removed codecs handled in the library? Can we link an
upstream applic
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 2:15 AM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
> On 2/21/22 14:16, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 21/02/2022 19:25, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> FIDO keys are significantly more secure than OTPs, and FAS should get
> >> support for them. OTPs are still phishable, whereas FID
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:39 AM Björn Persson wrote:
> Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > A quick (and likely
> > bad and incomplete) bugzilla search shows
> > over 1000 tickets where there are upstream
> > updates that are still in NEW status in
> > bugzilla and had been (initially) opened
> > over a y
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 12:21 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82370784
>
> DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: package emacs-1:27.2-9.fc35.x86_64 requires
> libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> DEBUG util.py:444
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 06:38:11PM +0000, Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> >
> > I guess it was a mirror caching issue. I tried again just now and it
> picked
> > up the update just fine. I didn't think the updates-
It appears that liborcus had an soname bump yesterday from 0.16 to 0.17,
and the dependent packages were not rebuilt at the time. This seems to
affect only LibreOffice, but makes it non-installable in Rawhide. Can
someone rebuild it for the new library version?
Thanks,
-Ian
___
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 1:15 PM Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 12:13:11PM +0000, Ian McInerney via devel napsal(a):
> > I am trying to install a bodhi update that was pushed to testing last
> night
> > (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-20f36
I am trying to install a bodhi update that was pushed to testing last night
(https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e), and I am
using the DNF line it gives me but seeing this string instead:
$ sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-20f36a8b0e
La
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 11:37 AM Ian McInerney
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built
>> the packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104.
>
&
Apparently there were soname bumps in other lxqt packages that were updated
other than just those two. The qtermwidget package appears to have had an
soname bump from libqtermwidget5.so.0 to libqtermwidget5.so.1, breaking at
least TexStudio in Rawhide. I did a build for it, and it has been pushed t
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:47 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 9:29 AM Ian McInerney via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:19 PM Justin Forbes
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:19 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:34:52AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > > What exactly is wrong?
> > >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?state=3&order=-build_id
> >
>
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 10:39 AM Zamir SUN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm updating the whole LXQt desktop to 1.0.0 in rawhide, and I've built
> the packages in the side tag f36-build-side-49104.
Did you run the build for lxqt-wallet? I see that there is a commit in
distgit that bumps the version to 1.0.0
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:06 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 03:26:52PM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > The License field of wlcs has been corrected from “GPLv2 or GPLv3” to
> > “GPLv3”.
>
> https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs (is this the right repo?) contains
> both COPYING.GPL2 a
Ideally, I think the %cmake macro should only add new cmake-specific flags
that are needed and not add any other ones not defined by the base
distribution to the build. None of these feel like cmake-specific flags to
me, because -DNDEBUG is applicable to all build chains, and the others are
in %opt
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 9:38 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/retire_NIS_user_space_utils
>
>
> == Summary ==
>
> This change is about retiring the ypbind, yp-tools, and ypserv
> packages, and removal of the {nis,yp}domainname user-space utility
> programs from the ho
I think if you jump more than 2 versions at a time the packages obsoleted
by fedora-obsolete-packages might not be picked up properly because it only
holds packages for about 2 versions before they are removed from it. So
jumping from F26 to F33 directly might miss the obsoletes from F27-F31ish.
-
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 9:12 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 11:38:12AM -0400, Link Dupont wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 26 2021 at 03:12:24 PM +, Zbigniew
> > Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >True. But those subpackages could just be built from one
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 11:00 AM Felix Schwarz
wrote:
>
> Am 24.08.21 um 22:47 schrieb Steven A. Falco:
> > Should I edit the criteria in f33 so I can mark it stable before the 7
> days
> > elapse, or should I let it wait? It seems weird that one release would
> have to
> > wait longer than the
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 4:13 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
> The same specialization of ProcessorCache:
>
>template class ProcessorCache;
>
> is explicitly instantiated in two different translation units:
>
> src/OpenColorIO/Processor.cpp
> src/OpenColorIO/Config.cpp
>
> which violates the C+
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 12:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 7:43 AM Ian McInerney
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:26 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Filtered_Flathub_Applications
> >>
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:26 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Filtered_Flathub_Applications
>
> == Summary ==
> Enabling third-party repositories will now create a Flathub remote
> that is a filtered view of Flathub.
>
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> 'Note that t
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 8:40 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> Why are you trying to install a srpm?
>
>
D'oh *facepalm*. That is what I get when I don't pay attention when copying
the rpm from one folder to another. Yep, it works on the actual RPM now.
-Ian
___
I was just trying amock build of Audacity to test some updates and I am now
having trouble installing it on F34 because of a conflict between
jack-audio-connection-kit and pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit:
$ sudo dnf install ./audacity-3.0.2-3.fc34.src.rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 2:19:21
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 4:56 PM Martin Gansser
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I received a message from bugzilla [1] that my package cmst cannot be
> installed on f35.
> How can I solve this ?
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1964628
>
The bugzilla is saying that it can't find the package c
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 2:46 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 03:18:10PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> > Am Di., 8. Juni 2021 um 14:35 Uhr schrieb Richard W.M. Jones
> > :
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:59:54PM -0400, Ben Cotton w
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:56 PM Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 AM Michael J Gruber
> wrote:
> > I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong
> anyways, so I'd suggest 3) in any case, with the possibility that someone
> can still take up auctex, fix the ema
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 2:39 PM Michael J Gruber
wrote:
> > spec
> > actually provides a "tex-preview" package that is just preview.sty and
> > is used by several packages to do tex rendering and preview:
> > $ repoquery --repo=rawhide{,-source} --whatrequires tex-preview
> > Last metadata expira
> emacs-auctex orphan 1 weeks
> ago
>
> This one is going to break some non-emacs packages as well because the
spec actually provides a "tex-preview" package that is just preview.sty and
is used by several packages to do tex rendering and preview:
$ r
I was just experimenting after poking at this bug http
s://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1847265, and I found some
interesting behavior.
This is how to reproduce it:
1) Use the Cinnamon live CD
2) Install a random flatpak (note, since this is on live you have to deal
with the space issue fir
On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 8:28 AM Johannes Lips
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> after quite some years, I would like to hand over the following packages
> to new maintainers. I will not orphan them if no one picks them up, but it
> would be great if someone with an interest in these packages could take
> the
On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 7:42 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 2021-05-01 2:42 a.m., Germano Massullo wrote:
> > Il 30/04/21 18:33, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 02:19:31PM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote:
> >>> After running
> >>> dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=34
> >>> an
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021, 21:53 Germano Massullo,
wrote:
> Good day, I am creating a spec file [0] for memleax memory leaks
> analyzer [1], but during build [2] I am getting error "invalid option:
> --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu.". Where can be the problem?
> Thank you
>
> [0]: https://pagure.io/meml
Is there a way I can disable the creation of updates automatically in Bodhi
for builds I submit to rawhide? I find it very inconvenient because it
means I can't add the appropriate bugzilla references/description to the
update when I submit package updates that need them. I would prefer the
behavio
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 2:34 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Linux_in_os-release
>
> == Summary ==
>
> "Fedora" is the name of our project. Our general-purpose Linux
> distribution is "Fedora Linux". Let's refer to it that way in the OS itself.
>
> == Owner ==
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 10:12 PM Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Ben Cotton said:
> > This change isn't big — it is simply expanding
> >
> > * NAME=Fedora to NAME="Fedora Linux" and
> > * PRETTY_NAME="Fedora Linux [##] ([edition or spin])
> >
> > in the file /etc/os-release.
>
> I have se
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 10:38 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote:
> Hello,
>
> please see attached rebuild of autoconf-dependencies [1]. I would like to
> ask maintainers of the dependent packages to check if their packages are
> buildable with autoconf-2.71. It seems that lots of packages are checking
> for
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:04 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:59:24AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 03:50:06PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > This is something we explicitly did not want on the git level, which
> > > is why there is a main
I notice now that this change has broken web links to items in the master
branch of a repo - since there seems to be no forwarding to the rawhide
branch on the web UI. This is slightly annoying because sometimes links to
spec files are added in bug reports, and now those links end up on a page
cann
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 5:58 PM Germano Massullo
wrote:
> Can anybody please help updating Audacity package? I cannot help this
> time. Despite this package has 2 maintainers, the software is no
> up-to-date and is highly unstable and crashes every time you use it
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
It looks like upstream CMake hasn't updated the FindBoost.cmake file they
bundle (
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/blob/master/Modules/FindBoost.cmake#L1604).
I have opened an upstream issue with CMake at
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/-/issues/21773 since this also
affects some of
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 7:28 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> snip...
> >
> > What is this macro going to be called? I would like to get an early
> > start on updating my packages.
> No idea. I'm open to suggestions.
>
>
Any update on the name of this macro/its implementation? I am working on
revising a s
I noticed due to an upstream bug report for a project I am on that the Fedora
packaging guidelines still say that GUI applications should install their files
as appdata.xml files and not metainfo.xml files
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData/). The
upstream spec f
On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 5:33 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 12/30/20 3:48 PM, Ian McInerney wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 7:54 PM Ben Cotton > <mailto:bcot...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOB
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 7:54 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LTOBuildImprovements
>
>
> == Summary ==
> Currently all packages that are not opted out of LTO include
> -ffat-lto-objects in their build flags. This proposal would remove
> -ffat-lto-objects from the def
gnome-software doesn't ingest the appdata file directly, it is instead
looking at bundled data from appstream-builder. I think the local file
gnome-software wants to ingest should be created by running
appstream-builder on the RPM of the program with your updated appdata file.
-Ian
On Mon, Dec 21
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 4:21 PM Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:55 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > For what's it worth I think that packages that only use make via cmake
> should
> > not have an explcit dependency on make. Packages that use make directly
> should
> > have an expli
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 5:40 PM Wolfgang Ulbrich wrote:
> I know where my package are listed at
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/dashboard/projects :)
> But...
> [root@mother rave]# dnf repoquery --whatrequires sgpio
> Letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten: vor 1:28:41 am Mi 11 Nov 2020
> 17:0
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 9:32 PM Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > Like tftp we may replace xinetd by systemd service files [1] ,
> > if we replace cvs-inetd by a systemd service, the problem is solved.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tftp/c/15a26fcde8a007
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 12:25 PM Wolfgang Ulbrich wrote:
> > Affected (co)maintainers (either directly or via packages' dependencies):
>
> < cut >
> > raveit65: sgpio
>
> I am still wondering why i am listed here as (co)maintainers.
> I do not maintain this package.
>
> Cheers
> Wolfgang
>
It is
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 8:46 PM José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> I found that postscript files that do not open with either evince or
> okular
> in F33 (I am aware that they use poppler as backend so probably the
> culprit is
> here). Evince tells me that it loading the file but it never ends.
In your original email you said that this resolves CVE bug [1], which says
in it:
"NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only
one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at
the same time. If you need to fix the versions independent of each
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:46 PM Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
> On 12/07/20 12:33 +0100, Ian McInerney wrote:
>This is what the upstream project explicitly says to do when using LLVM10:
> >
> https://github.com/imageworks/OpenShadingLanguage/blob/master/src/cmake/externalpackages.cmake
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:15 PM Andy Mender
wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 21:47, Robert-André Mauchin
> wrote:
>
>> %build
>> %cmake \
>>-B build \
>>-DUSE_BOOST_WAVE=ON \
>>-DUSE_PARTIO=OFF \
>>-DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=14 \
>>-DLLVM_STATIC=0 \
>>-DENABLERTTI=ON \
>>-D
I have been going through the packages listed in the comps file for rawhide
(given in here https://pagure.io/fedora-comps) to clean it up and remove any
packages that are currently not in any Fedora rawhide repos, and to update the
architectures for packages that are only available on certain on
It's failing because OSL needs C++14 or higher for LLVM 10 (as the CMake
error hints at). Try passing in "-DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=14" to you CMake
arguments.
-Ian
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 4:48 PM Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I am getting OpenShadingLanguage package needed for Blender
>
>
> If the only case is git... which by the way behaves in that way even
> on Windows... isn't it a git problem?
> I like not having a default editor and a more user-friendly approach
> would be to ask the user what they want on the installation or on the
> first run.
>
>
git is not the only prog
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:49 AM Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Thursday, June 25, 2020 11:44:06 PM CEST Ian McInerney wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:58 PM Kamil Dudka wrote:
> > > ...snip...
> > >
> > > Gentoo Linux uses the /etc/env.d tree to globally s
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:49 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> That would be a rather serious flaw in the wireguard tools package to
> have a dep on akmod-wireguard when it has been upstream and included
> in the Fedora kernel-modules package for a few months at this point.
>
>
The wire
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:58 PM Kamil Dudka wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> Gentoo Linux uses the /etc/env.d tree to globally set environment
> variables:
>
> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/tasks-reference/environment/index.html
>
> It worked there long time before systemd was invented. But clearing t
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 9:04 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 3:41 PM Ian McInerney
> wrote:
> >>
> >> ...snip...
> >> == Scope ==
> >> * Proposal owners:
> >> ** Modify comps to include nano Fedora wide.
> >>
>
> ...snip...
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners:
> ** Modify comps to include nano Fedora wide.
> ** Create a new subpackage of nano, called
> nano-editor.
> ** nano-editor to include
> /usr/lib/environment.d/10-nano.conf, which sets
> $EDITOR to nano.
>
> With this approach, if nano is uninstalle
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
