Thanks a lot!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fe
Hi all,
I was wondering if it would be possible, perhaps by a provenpackager, to update
the abovementioned package. There already is a bug report for quite some time
here [1].
The upstream discussion about this bug is here [2] and I even provided a pull
request to make the update even easier.
T
I've now also filed a bug report
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030824 for amluto. Please see the
output of the fedora-active-user script in the following comment of the
original bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685216#c10
Would this be sufficient or do I need to s
Hi all,
the package python-musicbrainzngs [1] has a long-standing bug [2] and is not
upgraded to the latest version, which creates all sorts of issues for dependent
packages. Therefore, I would like to ask if a proven-package could initiate an
update. There's already a pull-request at
https://
Sorry, to bother again, but I missed that you only created the update for f35,
but for at least f34 this should be an update to push into stable.
Thanks again.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel
> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 8:28 AM Johannes Lips wrote:
>
> maintainer.
> My fas is imcinerney.
Thanks, just added you.
>
> -Ian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
Thanks for that!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fe
> On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 9:28 AM Johannes Lips wrote:
>
> Hello Johannes,
>
> Feel free to assign elementary-icon-theme to me. I'm already the
> maintainer of all other elementary / Pantheon packages in Fedora.
> Thank you for your work with maintaining those packages
gt; On Sun, 2 May, 2021, 12:59 pm Johannes Lips, wrote:
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-o
Hi all,
I would like to ask if someone, probably a proven packager, could look into
fixing a bug a lot of Xfce and dnfdragora users are facing at the moment.
The problem is that the update notification does not disappear by itself, but
needs to be clicked away. See upstream bug report and also a
Dear all,
after quite some years, I would like to hand over the following packages to new
maintainers. I will not orphan them if no one picks them up, but it would be
great if someone with an interest in these packages could take them over.
backintime - backintime backup tool
elementary-icon-th
In defense of the maintainers, these build dates are right around f33 branching
on August 11th, so perhaps that is the reason, why they've missed f33.
johannes
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>
> Well, as I understand it, the main reason he is sending those private
> replies is that he was banned from the mailing list, or put on moderation or
> something.
>
> If this mailing list were actually a place where people are allowed to voice
> their technical criti
Hi Joseph,
I am also affected by that bug and I think this is the relevant bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800935
Cheers
Johannes
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
> "Johannes Lips"
>
> We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not
> bodhi. If there's a problem with an already pushed update, it needs to
> be in bugzilla - where it's actually discoverable - not in bodhi, where
> it will
Hi all,
I was recently bit by a bug, which was caused by a mismatch between
texlive-biblatex and biber. The technical side is not so important, only so
much that they need each other in a pretty specific version, which is not
reflected on the rpm level.
What I found weird is that you can't comm
Hi all,
since backintime released a new, major update we need to transition away from
Qt4 to Qt5. I would like to ask for an informal review on the newly created
spec file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1703680
Additionally, I would like to ask if we should get rid of the -common
Hi all,
due to lack of interest and upstream development I've orphaned the package:
devilspie: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/devilspie
keybinder: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/keybinder
I had a hard time finding out if there was any upstream activity at all
and I think there are newe
> On 29.8.2018 20:05, Johannes Lips wrote:
>
> Try contacting the maintainers fo the dependent packages directly?
Well, I just did it this morning, let's see if there's some feedback. Otherwise
I'll just proceed with the retirement process of the p
Hi all,
since keybinder won't build on any fedora version >=29 and all functionality
should be provided by the newer python3 keybinder3 package.
I would like to ask if it's ok to retire it, but since there are some packages
depending on it, I would rather orphan it and let someone else take care
Well, of course, but the issue is not the change itself or anything. It's just
the implementation and the lack of information for the maintainer.
The maintainer just sees a git commit without additional information other than
the scriplets are obsolete, which is not a lot to be honest. I would h
Would have been nice to get some more background information than just the git
commit message. Then one needs to do research to find this thread and the
related ticket. I don't have time to follow all the discussions/tickets on
devel or anywhere else, but this is even more time consuming. Especi
I would like to add, that apparently the capitalization of subpackages also
changed. This broke dependencies for me. I don't know if this was intended.
Please see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485703
If it was intended, I am happy to fix this, otherwise please check your script
t
> Hi Johannes,
>
> as I'm experienced with Qt related stuff (member of KDE SIG too) and
> also use TeXStudio as my default TeX editor all day, I requested commit
> access now :)
You're hired! ;-)
>
> Greetings,
> Christian
>
>
>
Dear list,
I would like to invite packagers with Qt experience to become co-maintainer on
the texstudio package. I am pretty occupied with my day job and won't have time
to delve into all details of Qt linking, which are currently not working
properly, when building the package for fedora >24.
> Am Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:02:01 -0700
> schrieb Orion Poplawski
> Seems to be more comlicated,than just the build-error.
> Nevertheless, "autoreconf ..." or "autoconf" does not work.
> Just for the build-fix:
> the newest upstream should have fixed the library-path problem, but the
> configure-scr
> Am 28.11.2016 09:51, schrieb Johannes Lips:
>
> The pregenerated configure-script looks for libmpi.so in "/usr/lib
> /usr/lib/openmpi /usr/lib64/openmpi/lib", but on i686 it's in
> "/usr/lib/openmpi/lib".
> Regenerating the configure-script might
Hi all,
I've been trying to build gretl with mpi support and I followed the guidelines
in the wiki [1]. It apparently works, since I was able to build it on 64bit,
which worked every time, but the 32bit build always fails to find the openmpi
libraries, as can be seen from the build.log from the
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:17:08 +1000
> Peter Hutterer
>
> Yeah, I have never seen that here.
>
> Can you perhaps provide the information Oliver is asking for in the bug?
I've just tried libinput again and it seems to be working without any problems.
Don't know what then was the problem.
Sorry
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:08:29 +0200
> Johannes Lips
>
> Can you expand on how/what didn't work here?
>
> I've been using it here with Xfce just fine since support was added...
> no particular problems here.
Hi Kevin,
I think I was affected by this bug,
On 20.10.2016 08:39, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Retire Synaptics Driver =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RetireSynapticsDriver
Change owner(s):
* Peter Hutterer
Retire the xorg-x11-drv-synaptics driver and remove it from user's install.
== Detailed Description =
Why not retire it directly and properly? Just an idea ;-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> rpms/backintime -- Simple backup tool inspired from the Flyback
I've taken backintime, as always co-maintainers are highly welcome, since it
needs quite a bit of work to get it up to date.
Thanks,
Johannes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Johannes Lips wrote:
>
> You make a lot of assumptions in that statement. People filter email
> quite a bit and relying on bugzilla mail alone is not sufficient.
>
> I find it ironic that your original email said "I would like to
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:
>
> Did you actually email cicku directly? I don't see him on CC.
>
Well, apparently I didn't add him to this e-mail, but he should have received
enough notifications from bugzilla already. Additionally from someo
Dear all,
I would like to formally send a mail requesting some feedback from cicku
regarding the maintenance of the backintime package.
There is one open bug, which requests an update [1] and additionally a trac
ticket [2] was also opened, not by me.
I can see, that with an upgrade to later ver
Please leave this thread alone. Since numerous days, nothing about the
original subject has been added.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Sorry to say, but this is like the hundredth time this topic came up.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-July/200860.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/co
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Christopher
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Rejy M Cyriac wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/2014 07:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> >
>> > Am 15.11.2014 um 15:06 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
>> >> Lars Seipel wrote:
>> >>> What does the community think of it? Is it okay for
Hi all,
could someone from the Rel-Eng team please unblock the tilda package? I
already opened a ticket with the request and I am not sure how long I'll
have to wait until it gets unblocked. [1]
-johannes
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6018
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> One of the long standing features that were enabled by default in yum is
> support for delta rpms. dnf developers have disabled this and I think this
> change deserves a broader discussion
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
&
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
> maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
> maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
> maintaining their packages (and if so, have
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Mukundan Ragavan <
nonamed...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to update Texmaker from version 4.2 to 4.3 and I have run
> into a problem I am unable to solve. Here it is -
>
> The source tar
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Jan Rusnacko
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> following the policy for nonresponsive maintainers, does anyone have a
> contact of Jeroen van Meeuwen (kanarip) ? All three mail addresses listed
> here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Kanarip bounce back, including
> FAS email
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <
> pin...@pingoured.fr>
> >wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:08:13AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 07/16/2014 03:10 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Well, I contacted kanarip off-list and
Les Howell wrote on Mon 23 Jun 2014 20:04:56 CEST:
> On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 19:57 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
>> Chris Adams wrote:
>>> Once upon a time, Johannes Lips said:
>>>> Well, yeah and everybody is reading the complete output of yum/dnf if
>>>>
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Johannes Lips said:
>> Well, yeah and everybody is reading the complete output of yum/dnf if
>> it's trying to remove hundreds of packages?
>
> Well, yeah. First, if you think you are removing a leaf or minor
> package and
Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Reindl Harald said:
>> without that protection any "what is that, i don't need it"
>> and try to remove it brings the danger to ruin the setup
>
> And the protection is already there - the list of dependent packages
> that will be removed, followed by a conf
Till Maas wrote:
>
> The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
> since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
> unless someone successfully builds them till then. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a p
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky <
> sochotni...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am doing spring cleanup and getting rid of most of my packages. The
>> full list is a bit too long (mizdebsk agreed to take over all of my
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:15:56 +0100
> Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> > Personally I always felt that this symbiotic relationship was a big
> > part of
> > > what made Fedora interesting.
> >
> > Yes, but please don't paint Red Hat bussiness goals
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:36 AM, Richard Vickery <
richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Being on the test kernel - or, more likely, using a more stable one from
> the list that is compiled - is probably the answer to the issue: how am I
> to watch a VOB file?
>
This has nothing to do with the ke
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Johannes Lips wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I finally came to the conclusion, that I no longer want to invest time and
> effort in keeping all my Java packages in good shape. I don't have the time
> anymore to unbundle all the bundled libraries and kee
Hi all,
I finally came to the conclusion, that I no longer want to invest time
and effort in keeping all my Java packages in good shape. I don't have
the time anymore to unbundle all the bundled libraries and keep a dozen
downstream patches to make it work.
freemind is close to a 1.0.0 release
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:40 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 22 August 2013 08:27, Bjorn Munch wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes we are! Sorry for the long silence. The window for F19 closed so
>> it became less urgent, then I had vacation, was sick, then others here
>> were on vacation but we're all here now and
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-08-04 at 21:35 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >> There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be
> >> addressed.
> >
> > I don't know if this is just a coincidence, but the links to log files
> > in the filled FTBFS bug
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:59 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> BOn Tue, 30.07.13 16:14, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 23:03 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:28:55PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > > > thunar and pcmanfm are file mana
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mercredi 03 juillet 2013 à 09:44 +0200, Johannes Lips a écrit :
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:32 AM, drago01 wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal
> >
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:32 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Pierre-Yves Luyten wrote:
> >> Not sure if it makes any sense but maybe could we have something like
> >> "freeze tag changes until desc is better".
> >>
> >>
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Since this topic comes up every few months, and no one's pointed
out the obvious answer yet, I'll say it:
* Instead of making up more rules, make the tooling better so
we don't have to repeat update descriptions in multiple places. *
Wouldn't it make sense to perhaps ap
Christopher Meng wrote:
I can take it because I love elementary's things.
Ok, it's orphaned now. Thanks and take good care of it :-)
-Johannes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all,
I am going to orphan the elementary-icon-theme, because it's of no use
to me. They dropped all the symlinks to make it compatible with other
desktops than Gnome3. So anyone interested is invited to take over.
Currently there is one open bug, where a user requests an update.
https://bu
Johannes Lips wrote:
Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Johannes Lips mailto:johannes.l...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to orphan link-grammar in a short while, because I
actually have absolutely no use for it and I don't recall, why I
p
Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Johannes Lips mailto:johannes.l...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
I am going to orphan link-grammar in a short while, because I
actually have absolutely no use for it and I don't recall, why I
picked it up in the
Hi all,
I am going to orphan link-grammar in a short while, because I actually
have absolutely no use for it and I don't recall, why I picked it up in
the first place.
So please anyone interested in abiword might want to pick it up.
Thanks a lot!
Johannes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fe
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>
>>> So, what about creating groups for the various desktop environments
>>> which pull in basesystem + xorg + mesa driver
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have been using smock.pl regularly and since it was not developed
> recently. I wonder what everyone else is using, e.g. does something
> better exist? If not, I am planning to give it a proper new home,
> currently I am trying
Dear all,
I've set up a small repo on fedorapeople.org to bring it to a greater
audience and receive some testing. [1]
So please enjoy a new freemind upstream version with a lot of new features
and a lot of bugfixes. If you find bugs or have suggestions, please just
drop me a mail.
Additionally I'
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
> Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream?
>>
>
> No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I don't
> immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or rea
Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado wrote:
Hi, everyone
I've a problem that has kept me worried about three weeks ago and i do
not know how to solve, when I try to test any package on koji (in any
instance, ppc, arm, s390, x86 ) that has a higher weight to a mega, it
refuses to even begin the tas
Hi all,
I am going to retire tilda in fedora rawhide in the near future. Upstream
is mostly dead and I had to maintain a lot of patches. Since the new
Xfce4-terminal also gained a dropdown mode, I don't have any further value
in tilda and so I would like to retire it and would advise all the users
Hi,
I was trying to build stuff for fedora 17 and it failed due to
dependency problems:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2017/4932017/root.log
What's happening and why is this happenening in a stable release?
Johannes
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4932017
--
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Johannes Lips wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda > > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:55 PM,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Caterpillar
> wrote:
> > Il 23/11/2012 15:33, Johannes Lips ha scritto:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I am looking for a new freemind maintainer. I've stated t
Hi all,
I am looking for a new freemind maintainer. I've stated the reason for this
in this mail to java-devel:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2012-November/004561.html
Perhaps someone would like to take over...
Johannes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Ok,I'll try
>
>
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/fping/
Seems to me that there is some action on the package. I don't know if I
miss something here.
Especially the Changelog is not so dead as you describe it.
https://apps.fedorapr
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Bill Nottingham
> wrote:
> > Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said:
> >> Bill Nottingham writes:
> >> > Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently
> >> > orphaned packages and packages
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Just a note that the following additional packages were orphaned yesterday
> as part of cleaning up packages owned by people without bugzilla accounts:
>
> devilspie
I've taken devilspie, but just that it's not removed from fedora since I
think it's often useful to Xfce us
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 07/04/2012 03:04 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> gvim as provided in the Fedora packages does not support session restore
>> (i.e. reopening with the same buffers) because it does not integrate
>> with the GNOME nor K
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Malcolm Turmel wrote:
> Its still taking up valuable space.
>
> All the non-english packages should be optional.
>
> When I try to remove one of the Package, it tells me its going to also
> Uninstall lots of other stuff.
>
> How would I go about now uninstalling al
Marek Kasik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next
> week.
> There are several API changes (new functions + 1 move of a private
> function to public section) and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.25 to
> libpoppler.so.26).
>
> Regards
>
> Marek
> ___
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
> > Today something happened, that happens over and over again with Fedora,
> > and it makes me angry. I am running Fedora 17, and so far it worked well
> > with the initial kernel 3.3.x (except that it would panic on shutdown...
> > but that w
Pete Walter wrote:
> Pavel Alexeev hubbitus.com.ru> writes:
>> May be in next time? What disadvantages you are seen proceed with that
>> update? Do you try test it?
>
> No, I did not test this. And here's a few reasons why I think this
> shouldn't be pushed:
>
> - You are forcing others to do
Tadej Janež wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 20:21 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>
>> It is main reason why I request provenpackager rights. In fedora 17 it
>> was so painful because I several times asks build dependencies and
>> then ask help to push updates too.
>> I think in that turn n
On 05/26/2012 10:23 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
I'm trying to follow up on struts,
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=239819
is the last mention I can see of it.
yum with *testing shows nothing.
How can I find if it's orphaned?
Hi,
you could checkout the pkgdb:
https://admin.fed
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 09:16 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > Even if all of your objections are true, and who knows, they might be:
> > > we already do provide alternatives. The Live media is not the only
> > > instal
Well I would like to see tilda maintained in fedora. In this bugreport I
created the patch and asked a provenpackager to apply it, which never
actually happened.
I could of course apply for co-maintainership but I doubt that the
maintainer would answer in a timely manner, like on most of his bugrep
Perhaps he was just not aware of these objections. Although I could not
speak for him but it's at least a possible explanation for the proposal.
Johannes
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 12:50 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On 04/27/2012 0
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-April/166087.html
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:10:45 +0200, AT (Antonio) wrote:
>
> > The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated
> > [1]<
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/votin
Is it this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812501
If yes, there is already an update in updates-testing which you could try.
hth
Johannes
On 04/21/2012 08:10 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Some update appears to have broken the operation of ypbind recently.
I have a F14 sever that serv
Hi,
I found http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Schedule and there seems
to be a relatively easy way to determine the Fedora 18 Release date.
Tuesday before October 31st. So most probably Tuesday, 30th October
2012, if I am not mistaken.
HTH
Johannes
On 04/16/2012 10:11 PM, David Malcolm w
As the maintainer of freemind, I also looked into packaging freeplane
but I gave up since it adds a whole bunch of new deps. I didn't have the
time and motivation to add all those, just for a program which basically
does the same as freemind. I know that it does have some additional
features an
On 03/30/2012 03:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:06:11 +0100
Johannes Lips wrote:
Hi all,
I really like this website[1] and think it's really useful. I just
wanted to know what the current state of it is. Especially could I
use the current URL to promote some packages
Hi all,
I really like this website[1] and think it's really useful. I just
wanted to know what the current state of it is. Especially could I use
the current URL to promote some packages or is it likely that the URL
could change in the near future.
Is there some place where I could find inform
On 03/16/2012 10:06 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
David Tardon wrote:
How do we prevent inexperienced testers from giving undeserved karma and
thus causing an update to be automatically pushed to stable?
One has to fulfil certain requirements before one becomes a packager.
But anyone with FAS account
There is a filed bug regarding this behavior. But so far no explanation or
cause for this behavior.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771043
Johannes
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> 2) yum is currently downloading repository information separately fo
Isn't it easiest to just ask for the FAS name of the person who wants to
become a packager? I don't really see how this should be less efficient
than searching the mail address in the FAS database.
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Thomas Spura wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 20
Alright to answer my own question: It was already orphaned in the last
round before f16. So it's probably worth reviving!
But I think the associated workload with reviving a package could be
lowered, just to make it easier for contributors!
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Johannes Lips
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
