cp -a scripts/dump_osc.1 scripts/send_osc.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/
--
José Abílio Matos--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Monday, 26 August 2024 20:57:01 WEST Leslie Satenstein via devel wrote:
> Add to the following, "Aisleriot" and "Meld"
>
> I definitely need "Meld".
>
>
> Leslie Satenstein
Meld already has a (quite simple) patch:
https://src.fedoraproje
have at least 320
GiB of RAM, they are clearly under-powered. ;-)
On a more serious, and boring, note does this warning rings a bell to anyone
who had a similar problem?
FWIW what is failing are the tests in x390x as they work for all other archs.
Best regards,
--
José Abílio Matos
,
--
José Abílio Matos
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https
On Monday, 13 March 2023 03.50.01 WET Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> This is a non-responsive maintainer check for jamatos (José Matos). Does
> anyone know how to contact José?
I am here and I will look into those issues.
The end of the first semester fallback took a lot longer than I was expecting.
On Monday, 17 October 2022 08.28.11 WEST Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> Thank you for pointing this. Why DNF5 is not named as DNF and why we do not
> plan to name it as DNF? DNF5 is a completely new product.
That is where the irony is, it is a new product but you still keep the moniker
DNF in the name
using spamassassin). :-)
--
José Abílio Matos
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Monday, 20 June 2022 12.45.07 WEST Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> python-doit immanetize jamatos
Looking in to src I search for the build to understand why did it failed:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1989134
as far as I can see it built without any issue.
Does that m
On Thursday, 16 June 2022 17.55.45 WEST Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I need to downgrade python-reportlab in Fedora 35 for a missing runtime
> dependency. What's the most accurate way?
>
> Bug ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097817
> Update: https://bodhi.fedorapr
On Monday, 14 March 2022 16.53.18 WEST José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I copied and pasted and while changing the option I left one of those rogue
> characters, keeping always the preffix. :-(
>
>
> I will try and see your suggestion.
After today's update
On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 03.41.48 WEST Christoph Junghans wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 9:50 AM Ben Beasley wrote:
> > The libcerf package was updated to version 2.1 in Rawhide yesterday[1],
> > which included an unannounced .so version bump from “1” to “2”.
>
> My mistake, I thought I did a
On Thursday, 7 April 2022 09.21.00 WEST Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> If bout++ and Octave are ready for Sundials 6, we can.
I am not sure that Octave is ready for Sundials 6, at least Octave 6, yet the
recently released Octave 7 (this week) should support it.
Looking a bit further it seems that
On Friday, 25 March 2022 02.20.13 WET Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> At least for both tellico and ghostwriter cases, I tried mockbuild and
> just downgrading binutils / binutils-gold to 2.37-24.fc36.x86_64 makes
linkage
> succeed, so for now I filed against binutils:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show
Hi,
in order to rebuild tellico, to fix a FTBFS bug, I get in the link stage the
following error:
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib64/libQt5WebEngineCore.so.5.15.8: undefined reference to
`std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator
>::_M_replace_aux(unsigned long, unsigned long, unsigned long,
char)@GLIB
On Monday, 14 March 2022 16.53.18 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I copied and pasted and while changing the option I left one of those rogue
> characters, keeping always the preffix. :-(
>
>
> I will try and see your suggestion.
After a reboot:
# update-c
On Monday, 14 March 2022 16.46.39 WET Simo Sorce wrote:
> If you have actually copy/pasted from the terminal it looks to me you
> used an incorrect character when trying to pass a long option, at least
> my MUA shows me you prepend long option names with "–-" instead of
> using the correct "--", ma
On Monday, 14 March 2022 10.49.38 WET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> What's the version of openssl?
The version on F36, that I am using is 3.0.0.
> Is there a public server which you can tell us the name of which gives
> this error?
I am connecting to an exchange email server (2010) using imap w
On Monday, 14 March 2022 11.04.56 WET Simo Sorce wrote:
> Have you tried setting crypto policies to LEGACY in case the server is
> old and supports only bad cryptography?
>
> Simo.
How do I do that?
Running update-crypto-policies always returns an error saying that the
argument is not recognise
In one, and just one, of my email accounts the upgrade to F36 failed with
this:
The underlying socket is having troubles when processing connection to
imap.xxx.xx.xx:993: Error during SSL handshake: error:0A0C0103:SSL
routines::internal error
No email program works, I tried kmail, trojitá, thu
On Saturday, 12 March 2022 15.35.02 WET Ian McInerney via devel wrote:
> Why are you suggesting reporting it to fedora-obsolete-packages? The Julia
> package is not obsolete, and the maintainers are acutely aware of the
> install
> problem and are tracking it in the appropriate FTBFS/FTI bugzilla e
On Saturday, 12 March 2022 11.23.11 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> Error:
> Problem: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
> libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed -
> package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), but
&
On Friday, 11 March 2022 17.43.01 WET Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 36 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf modu
On Tuesday, 1 February 2022 11.54.01 WET Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Which is also mentioned at https://jwakely.github.io/pkg-gcc-latest/
> so I've added a link to that page from the copr description.
Thank you.
That answered all my questions (regarding this issue :-) ).
Regards,
--
José Abílio
__
On Thursday, 27 January 2022 16.14.36 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> $ src/lyx
>
> [1] 61542
>
> src/lyx: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.30' not found (required
> by src/lyx)
>
>
> Any help here?
OK, one option is set the linker path
$ LD_LIBRARY
On Wednesday, 3 November 2021 13.47.22 WET Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Nice to see this going public, I will definitely be using it, thanks!
>
> And I'll shamelessly plug my copr with weekly GCC snapshots ;-)
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jwakely/gcc-latest/
Thank you for providing it.
On Thursday, 6 January 2022 09.02.02 WET Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> Good day all,
>
> I have just submitted a review request
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037645) for Cantera, a
> chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport tool suite
> (https://cantera.org/,
> https://copr.fed
On Sunday, 2 January 2022 21.08.45 WET Matthew Miller wrote:
> 1. As previously noted, Fedora Magazine seems like the right audience. Maybe
> interested people could collect topics and run an article every month?
FWIW I agree with you. In particular I remember a similar effort for R
packages (the
On Wednesday, 29 December 2021 15.01.49 WET Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Detailed Description ==
> In most of Linux distributions the standard Hunspell dictionary path
> is `/usr/share/hunspell/` but in Fedora still has
> `/usr/share/myspell/`. This effort is to follow default standard to
> install all H
On Friday, 24 September 2021 16.14.23 WEST Titouan Bénard wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm Titouan, I have made some contribution in open
> source and now I would like to contribute in Fedora.
>
> I would like to package python packages not present in Fedora.
>
> Thanks
Hi Titouan,
welcome to Fedora.
On Friday, 27 August 2021 18.31.36 WEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The other resource issue here is that when you modify the package to add
> the new wallpapers, everyone who has any of the old ones installed will
> need to pointlessly update them for the version change.
>
> But since that would only ha
On Thursday, 15 July 2021 19.05.31 WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Alea iacta est:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-238ef526b9
The last guy to say that had an untimely death, at the hand of friends (!!!).
:-D
Best regards,
--
José Abílio___
On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 14.09.15 WEST Kyle Knoepfel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm Kyle Knoepfel, a software developer at Fermi National Accelerator
> Laboratory. The majority of my projects are C++ based with a little Python
> mixed in (a few of them can be found at https://github.com/knoepfel).
>
On Wednesday, 7 July 2021 11.59.18 WEST Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I'm not listed as a (co)maintainer, so I'm not sure how I ended up on
> this list.
By a transitive dependency relation... :-)
Basically one of your packages depends on another package that depends on
guile22.
--
José Abílio___
On Thursday, May 20, 2021 1:15:57 AM WEST Ian McInerney wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:56 PM Jerry James wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:39 AM Michael J Gruber
> >
> > wrote:
> > > I'd say that packaging a texlive file in another package is wrong
> >
> > anyways, so I'd suggest 3) in a
Is there any place where we can find a central place for information for
installing jupyter in Fedora?
The best that I could found was an article on Fedora Magazine:
https://fedoramagazine.org/jupyter-and-data-science-in-fedora/
In this case the question come from my wife who installed today a n
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 1:40:11 AM WET Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Please keep in mind that Linus Torvalds himself announced his project with
> the words: "It is NOT protable" [sic] "(uses 386 task switching etc),". [1]
> The portability came much later, after major changes (such as rewritin
On Monday, March 22, 2021 5:02:47 PM WET Gordon Messmer wrote:
> As a rationale, your explanation as a whole seems retaliatory, to me.
> "The GNU project encouraged its volunteers to work on HURD instead of
> Linux, so we'll not speak their name because this makes us unhappy."
>
> That doesn't see
On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 4:34:48 PM WET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> Fedora is. Linux isn't. Linux is just an OS kernel. It cannot be used
> without helpers like GNU libraries and utilities.
Fedora is the project.
How do you distinguish the project from the distribution?
AFAICS this is an a
On Saturday, February 20, 2021 12:13:05 PM WET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> Looks OK. It is allowed for packages to be downgraded, if that's
> what you meant as a bug.
>
> Zbyszek
No the bug was that it worked. :-)
Since there were no failures that went against my expectation and thus th
On Saturday, February 20, 2021 9:49:12 AM WET Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> If you get this prompt:
>
>...
>Total download size: XXX M
>Is this ok [y/N]:
>
> you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade.
Oops, I got this.
...
Transaction Summary
===
On Monday, February 8, 2021 9:17:07 PM WET Fabio Valentini wrote:
> https://pagure.io/pagure-dist-git/issue/128
Thank you Fabio. :-)
--
José Abílio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@list
On Monday, February 8, 2021 5:15:13 PM WET Adam Williamson wrote:
> For the record it's also required by fedora-messaging, which is why
> just about everything else in the world needed it
The last release is from 2015, but there are different commits over the years
with the last being 10 days ag
On Monday, February 8, 2021 3:54:29 PM WET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-blinker orphan, pjp, sundaram 0 weeks
> ago
I took python-blinker that is required by nikola. In particular it means that
the following users/groups are covered:
abompard: python-blinker
adamwil
On Friday, February 5, 2021 3:03:58 PM WET Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> for i in `ls -1`
As far as I know there is no need to pass the -1. It should be enough
for i in `ls`
If the directories have spaces you need other technicalities, that is not the
case for our directories.
Regards,
--
José
On Monday, February 1, 2021 11:12:53 PM WET Jerry James wrote:
> Thank you for pointing that out. I think I see the problem. I'm
> testing a fix now and will push it if it fixes the issue.
When you do please let tell us, or let a note in the FTBFS maxima's report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
On Monday, February 1, 2021 4:53:25 PM WET Jerry James wrote:
> A new version of ECL has been released, with an soname bump on the
> shared library. Only maxima and sagemath depend on ECL, so I will
> rebuild both of them after updating ECL in about a week. I will do
> test builds in advance to i
On Friday, January 15, 2021 7:08:34 PM WET Matthew Miller wrote:
> As I understand it, IBM's state of the art beats that by one already!
I knew that the number was higher than 64, but then I would ruin the joke. :-)
At the same time if we do not measure it the number could be 64. :-D
This is more
On Friday, January 15, 2021 12:58:28 PM WET Stephen Coady wrote:
> For the moment, I'm concentrating on getting the QISKIT [1] libraries
> packaged in Fedora. I should hopefully have some updates together for
> this very soon.
That would be nice to have.
Are there any new requirements, other natur
On Friday, January 15, 2021 4:10:42 PM WET Matthew Miller wrote:
> I'd love to see us in this area.
Matthew, I can understand your point of view. Since the platforms that we
support are mostly 64-bit you would like also to see Fedora support (pure) 64
qubits systems. ;-)
And yes, I am aware tha
On Friday, January 8, 2021 3:38:44 PM WET Christoph Karl wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I want to un-retire the package python-pyswip.
>
> According to "dead.package" the reason for retiring this package is/was:
> "SWI Prolog (package pl) has been retired from Fedora, this package
> provided Python
Hi,
a bit later than what I expected (holidays are a busy time as well :-) ) I
will update armadillo to 10.1.0. This implies an so bump and so I will update
it in a side tag together with the dependent packages gdal and mlpack.
I intend to do this for rawhide, and later for Fedora 33 and 32.
On Saturday, January 2, 2021 1:34:32 PM WET chedi toueiti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This package is a new dependency of python-molecule. Can someone take a look
> and review it please.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1911296
>
> Happy to review in exchange.
Done. :-)
--
José Abílio_
On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 7:15:21 PM WET Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Creating the dependency graph by hand is fairly tedious, but maybe I'm
> missing an automated way. The point of creating that graph is to avoid
> wasting time and power doing and redoing builds that will fail until
> something
On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 3:51:16 PM WET Tom Stellard wrote:
> I'm only excluding packages that invoke make through the %cmake_build or
> %cmake_install macros. armadillo invokes make directly, which is why it
> is on the list.
>
> -Tom
You are right, in the %check section.
OK I have adde
On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:01:23 AM WET Tom Stellard wrote:
> Here is the list of packages for Dec 16:
> https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/br_make_day2.txt
>
> -Tom
Hi Tom,
I have two packages in your list: armadillo and emacs-common-ess.
My issue is with armadillo that it has BuildReq
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 8:04:24 PM WET Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>
> I'm running firefox 83.0-13.fc33.x86_64 with nss 3.59.0-2.fc33
> installed since it hit my local updates-testing mirror and all my
> add-ons are looking good. Could there be something else that's causing
> trouble? I have
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 7:17:21 PM WET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
> will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have to
> remove them and re-install them (after downgrading nss).
>
> For now, downgrade nss
On Wednesday, December 9, 2020 3:40:47 AM WET Steve Dickson wrote:
> Its a kernel problem... On the 5-9 kernel I tried
> bluez-5.53, bluez-5.54, bluez-5.5 all failed
> with Connection refused (111)
>
> Then I tried bluez-5.5 on the last 5.8 kernel
> (5.8.18-300.fc33)... everything worked again
>
On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 9:04:20 PM WET Steve Dickson wrote:
> Its a kernel problem... On the 5-9 kernel I tried
> bluez-5.53, bluez-5.54, bluez-5.5 all failed
> with Connection refused (111)
>
> Then I tried bluez-5.5 on the last 5.8 kernel
> (5.8.18-300.fc33)... everything worked again!
>
On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 1:31:15 PM WET Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:10 PM Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > I realize this is probably not the most appropriate list
> > to ask this question... but
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a pair of Jabra Elite 45h he
On Sunday, November 29, 2020 3:20:34 PM WET Richard Shaw wrote:
> Never mind, it has been reported and "fixed" it just needs to propagate to
> the builders I suppose.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
I am also in that queue. :-)
Thank you for letting us know that the problem is fixed.
--
José Abílio__
On Friday, November 20, 2020 4:26:53 PM WET Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Release Notes ==
> The GNU Compiler Collection version 11 will be released shortly. See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/changes.html.
>
> The GNU C Library version 2.32 will be released at the beginning of
> August 2020. The current N
On Thursday, November 19, 2020 5:54:52 PM WET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'm not sure that message editing is a feature.
In fairness as long as the grace period is fixed and small that is not a bad
thing.
E.g it allows you to fix lots of cases where you found that the message was
incomplete aft
On Monday, November 16, 2020 12:12:53 AM WET Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> Hello everyone,
Hi Jason,
welcome to Fedora. :-)
> I'm a Linux admin at a university supporting around 100+ EL7/8 and Ubuntu
> machines. I've been using Linux as a hobby since around 1994 and
> professionally since 1999. My
On Sunday, November 15, 2020 3:10:03 PM WET Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I want to rebuild some of the fedora 33 packages for EL8 (vagrant, for
> example), but I'm having trouble getting all of the build dependencies
> right. I ran dnf to download the SRPMS with the --resolve option,
On Thursday, November 12, 2020 11:24:47 PM WET Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> This list is public, and archived by all sorts of different websites.
> So too late
Michael, everyone knows that the best way to keep a secret is to hide it in
plain sight. :-)
--
José Abílio___
On Monday, November 2, 2020 2:44:39 PM WET Jakub Jelen wrote:
> I am looking for any kind of feedback from the idea through the
> usability, implementation. Is this something you would like to see in
> Fedora soon? Do you have something against this? Is your use case missing?
Hi Jakub,
if I am n
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 10:49:27 PM WET Barry wrote:
> After the trauma of the 3.0 release it would be mad to do a python 4.0 for
> such a trivial reason as packagers that assumed, wrongly, that version can
> only have single digits.
>
> Barry
This now is an epistemological discussion. :-)
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 2:05:53 PM WET Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs
> yesterday.
>
> Regards,
> Tomáš Hrnčiar
Thank you for doing that, and also for the previous round.
But FWIW I still think that it would
On Saturday, October 17, 2020 9:14:59 PM WEST Christian Dersch wrote:
> Same here, opening with Okular on F33 shows error messages such as
>
> (libspectre) ghostscript reports: fatal internal error
> -100org.kde.okular.generators.spectre: Generated image does not match
> wanted size: [0x0] vs requ
Hi,
I found that postscript files that do not open with either evince or okular
in F33 (I am aware that they use poppler as backend so probably the culprit is
here). Evince tells me that it loading the file but it never ends. Okular
accepts the file if I open it using "Import PostScript as PDF
On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 8:15:24 AM WEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> The KMail app stopped working for me today, and I realized there's
> update to which I'd like to give a try:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-15d324f87c
If you had installed the previous update to kde apps
On Friday, October 2, 2020 10:05:11 AM WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 10. 20 10:59, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> > Problem 2: package hippo-canvas-0.3.0-28.fc30.x86_64 requires
> >
> > libcroco-0.6.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> >
>
On Friday, October 2, 2020 10:04:34 AM WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Or a broken sed in %prep:
>
> sed -i 's/python/python3/' *.py
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871631
You are right, I arrived to the same conclusion. The sed call was required
with previous versions but suga
On Friday, October 2, 2020 8:50:19 AM WEST Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
> ...
In one machine I got this:
Problem 1: problem with installed package sugar-recall-6-4.fc31.noarch
- sugar-recall-6-4.fc31.noarch do
On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 2:45:28 PM WEST Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> The thing is that R(package) is meant to provide the original
> versioning (which allows hyphens and stuff), while R-package takes the
> adaptation to our versioning system. The problem is that we generally
> declare dependencies
On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 1:19:51 PM WEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> It actually queries bodhi and failing to find things in it, it fallsback to
> mdapi normally.
> Potential bug in the logic?
Another example:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/texlive
--
José Abílio_
On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 1:19:51 PM WEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> It actually queries bodhi and failing to find things in it, it fallsback to
> mdapi normally.
> Potential bug in the logic?
I noticed it before, since at least June, in other packages so I would say
yes.
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 12:39:15 PM WEST Fabio Valentini wrote:
> If anything, this is a bug in the R-rprojroot package, because version
> 1.3.2 provides: "R(rprojroot) = 1.3-2", which is smaller than 1.3.2,
> and hence is not enough for >= 1.3.2.
Thank you Fabio. Since this is done autom
Hi,
I am sorry if this has been discussed before but I do not remember it.
The culprit to this message was the review of R-pak
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883047
While running fedora-review that uses mock I found that I had an issue
installing the corresponding rpm in rawhide.
On Monday, September 21, 2020 6:30:47 PM WEST Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I just updated to F33, and now I think I get the same issue with
> BitBucket.org:
>
> $ ssh -Tv g...@bitbucket.org
> ...
> send_pubkey_test: no mutual signature algorithm
>
> It works if I use:
>
> $ ssh -Tv -oPubkeyAcceptedKeyT
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:52:14 PM WEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I agree , why not even have a count for starting to freeze ? , I though
> that freeze just start after we have first beta candidate.
It does not work that way. There is a freeze for beta and there is a freeze
for the final rele
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 4:30:54 AM WEST Tom Seewald wrote:
> Has anyone compiled a (non-exhaustive) list of known issues that are
> specific to KDE Plasma with Wayland?
https://community.kde.org/Plasma/Wayland_Showstoppers
--
José Abílio___
deve
On Tuesday, September 8, 2020 5:32:30 PM WEST Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Please no, KWin Wayland makes my system crash as soon as I connect my second
> screen, and does not support essential functions like Kwin scripting, make
> Yakuake look terrible and the whole stuff feels buggy as hell.
> Ev
On Saturday, 8 August 2020 16.26.39 WEST Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Can someone please check?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Andrea
When that happens I issue another rebuild and the problem is solved. In other
words this is a transient problem.
--
José Abílio___
de
On Tuesday, 4 August 2020 12.42.30 WEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> Then you should do the following:
>
> %undefine __cmake_in_source_build
>
> %cmake
> %cmake_build
> %cmake_install
Would not it be more clean to place the %undefine line inside guards?
%if (0%{?rhel} || (0%{?fedora} && 0%{?fedora} < 33
On Monday, 6 July 2020 18.55.11 WEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I restarted the database server this morning. It usually takes about 1.5
> seconds to restart, so you must have just hit it in that window.
>
> kevin
My only concern was if there was any kind of (hidden) consequence of the
error. From yo
While calling "fedpkg build" I got the warning (error?) displayed in the
title:
...
Could not execute build: database outage
Apparently the build is over and well. :-)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46677172
This is just a report since everything is OK, I have used a side t
On Thursday, 2 July 2020 21.38.46 WEST Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 3 files in lost+found, -1 files gone/unreachable
This last line from the xfs test seems suspicious (the -1 file gone). :-)
--
José Abílio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 00.56.23 WEST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> I just tested it on F32 Workstation and for me it does. Have you
> cleaned dnf's databases by any chance? I think either that or having
> the packages as dependencies of something that was installed by the
> user would prevent the
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 00.56.23 WEST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> I just tested it on F32 Workstation and for me it does. Have you
> cleaned dnf's databases by any chance? I think either that or having
> the packages as dependencies of something that was installed by the
> user would prevent the
On Monday, 29 June 2020 22.23.00 WEST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> This tends to take with it many things that it shouldn't, like gdb,
> dbus-x11, python3-pwquality, tigervnc-server-minimal and tmux - among
> others.
I noticed that before but at least on F32 it does not do it anymore. I have
rem
On Tuesday, 16 June 2020 07.09.17 WEST Lumir Balhar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The change has been accepted and implemented in:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-922b21ffde
>
> This means that the affected packages will FTBFS with the following error:
>
> %_python_bytecompile_extra
On Monday, 22 June 2020 20.05.45 WEST Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile bear-engine for rawhide, but this fails with the
> following error message [1]:
> /builddir/build/BUILD/bear-c873f289d860a2e11d36a2e619ea8c51167098c4/bear-en
> gine/core/src/net/code/client.cpp: In member
On Tuesday, 16 June 2020 03.41.09 WEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> CMake themselves do not recommend doing in-source builds (and they've
> already warned that this will eventually stop working). Meson doesn't
> even permit it. These days, Autotools is the weird exception that
> mostly mandates in-source bu
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 16.40.28 WEST Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Yes, it used the old version:
>
> DEBUG util.py:602: boost-develx86_64
> 1.69.0-22.fc33 build 9.9 M
>
> But I don't think it depends on the shared libraries so it's not going
> to have
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 15.57.14 WEST Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> The side tag is merging right now, you just have to wait for 100+
> packages to be signed, and they'll be in rawhide.
Oops, I submitted now a new lyx for rawhide. If for some reason it
picks the old boost I will rebuild it with 1.73.
On Saturday, 30 May 2020 16.01.50 WEST Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on updating FreeCAD both for Python 3.9 and coming VTK 9.0 and I
> noticed that something is pulling in a lot of texlive packages but I am not
> BR'ing any.
>
> First, how do I figure out which package is doing it? There's no
On Friday, 22 May 2020 12.51.26 WEST Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Also, the build now fails with "! LaTeX Error: File `hanging.sty' not
> found.". graphite2 sources do not contain any .tex files, but
> graphite2 uses LaTeX / pdf output when building documentation /
manual
> with doxygen, so I'm pretty
On Monday, 11 May 2020 19.31.39 WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Any code contribution to make the output work better is appreciated, but
> unfortunately, I am not available to work on this, sorry
Where is the code?
I search for it without success. :-)
--
José Abílio
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
