, possible also some
functional tests might be affected:
https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/447
Best regards,
/M
--
六 Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE
Red Hat Slack :: mvadkert :: #testing-farm #tmt
Fedora Matrix :: mvadkert :: #Fedora CI
️ Remote Czech
Forgot to CC devel list for a larger audience ...
On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 4:16 PM Miroslav Vadkerti
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Fedora CI is very well alive! We will be sending out bi-weekly updates
> like this one about some of our plans, interesting information and status
> updat
Rawhide testing with Zuul was disabled until the issue is fixed.
Please use, the testing results from Fedora CI PR testing until it the dnf5
issues are resolved.
Best regards,
/M
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:45 PM Miroslav Vadkerti
wrote:
> To mitigate errors, I am proposing to disa
To mitigate errors, I am proposing to disable Rawhide testing via Zull in
dist-git PRs:
https://pagure.io/fedora-zuul-jobs-config/pull-request/180
/M
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:19 PM Miroslav Vadkerti
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A small update, Zuul testing is still blocked, please use th
regards,
/M
On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 11:16 AM Miroslav Vadkerti
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a few more issues appeared:
>
> 1. Testing PRs via Zuul is broken due to missing feature in dnf5
>https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues/549
>
>No ETA for fixing thi
.
ETA 30 min.
Best regards,
/M<
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 7:39 PM Miroslav Vadkerti
wrote:
> Both issues were hot patched, and testing against Rawhide is unblocked
> again \o/
>
> Thanks to all who helped!
>
> /M
>
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:51 PM Miroslav Vadkerti
>
Both issues were hot patched, and testing against Rawhide is unblocked
again \o/
Thanks to all who helped!
/M
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 2:51 PM Miroslav Vadkerti
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing Farm.
>
> We are trying to hotpat
Hi,
Fedora Rawhide testing blocked on dnf5 update, which broke Testing Farm.
We are trying to hotpatch the problems to bring back testing against
Rawhide.
ETA 2 hours.
For updates watch:
https://status.testing-farm.io/issues/2023-06-21-rawhide-outage/
Best regards,
/M
--
Miroslav Vadkerti
rg/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing
/Quick+Start+Guide
[3] https://tmt.readthedocs.io/en/stable/spec/plans.html#install
--
Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / BaseOS QE / OSCI
IRC mvadkert #tft #baseosci #osci :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95
TPB-C 2C215 :: Mobile +420 773 944 252
Red Hat Czech s.r.o, Purkyňova 115, 612 00
FTR verified, when TMT is not around, it is now skipped:
https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status/change/189,a906cee4eafd4a13c699b8964a1a69f6acdd03c9
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:04 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 07. 21 1:02, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
> > Hi Miro,
>
Hrončok wrote:
> On 21. 07. 21 15:04, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Today we are gladly announcing that the Zuul CI system for Fedora, which
> is
> > running checks for pull requests against src.fedoraproject.org
> > <http://src.fedoraproject.o
--
Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm
IRC mvadkert #fedora-ci
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
> Hi Richard,
>
>
> This is https://pagure.io/fedora-ci/general/issue/161, only know workaround
> is to rerun
> the test (by logging in to the Jenkins instance and hitting the Rebuild
> button). Not yet
> sure why this is happening, I will try to concentrate on it in next weeks, it
> is quite
Hi Richard,
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-667db9b546
>
> Some tests have failed, but as usual there seems to be no easy way to
> work out why. For example the hivex test has this useless console
> output:
>
>
>
Actually that would not help in this situation, I was talking about Fedora,
ELN builds are not planned to be gated ..
I stand corrected, thanks @Michal Srb
/M
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 9:42 AM Miroslav Vadkerti
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can we share the timeline for making rpmdeplint and insta
oject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / BaseOS QE / OSCI
IRC mvadkert #tft #baseosci #osci :: GPG 0x7B5B2E95
TPB-C 2C215 :: Mobi
Hi,
sorry for the late response :(
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:42 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2018 at 11:26:59AM +0200, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
> > For this time I rescheduled the run:
> >
> >
> >
> https://jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.
__
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_li
> The issue described in the article was fixed by requiring an absolute
> path in core_pattern (If I understand it correctly).
>
> If core_pattern is unsafe, the process is not dumped at all (man 5 proc).
>
> The kernel commit adds a warning, because kernel was silently ignoring
> crashes and
20 matches
Mail list logo
