Re: Starting user UIDs at 1000 - please check your packages

2011-07-21 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Miloslav Trmač wrote:

 No, applications expect system accounts and user accounts to have
 non-overlapping ID intervals.  So this would be just a more broken
 version of keeping the limit at 500.

+1. And keeping consistency with other distros. Definitely the right 
move, since UID=1000 is the documented standard.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Adam Williamson wrote:

 ifconfig shows I have em1, p2p1;
 Why does it not defined as pcislot#port?

 The man page is out of date. pciXp_Y got changed to pXpY, I believe
 because it turned out to be important that the names be kept below a
 certain length.

I also have biosdevname-0.3.8-1.fc15.x86_64, but ifconfig says I have 
eth0 and eth1 for the wireless. How come?


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Adam Williamson wrote:

 That would indicate your BIOS doesn't have the necessary support; 
quite
 a few don't. There's some notes on what's needed for biosdevname to 
work
 at
 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-01-27_Network_Device_Nami
ng_With_Biosdevname#Hardware_Requirements

I ran the script, output:

Checking hardware requirements [  OK  ]
Checking for SMBIOS type 41 support[FAILED]
Checking for SMBIOS type 9 support [  OK  ]
Checking for PCI Interrupt Routing support [  OK  ]

The instructions say:

If the output of the script is [ OK ] and any of the following checks 
is [ OK ], your hardware is supported by biosdevname.

So, what's wrong?

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Tom Hughes wrote:

 Did you upgrade this machine from an earlier version of Fedora? If so
 then I suspect the old names will stick because you will have udev
 persistent naming rules for them.

No, I did a clean install. I installed a week before the first Test 
Candidate for the first Release Candidate of the Alpha for Fedora 15 
came out.
 
 Check /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and I bet you have 
rules
 that are forcing the ethX names.

Yes, this file is present.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


RE: biosdevname in fedora 15 - why is this inconsistency?

2011-07-08 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
shyam_i...@dell.com wrote:

 Can you create a BZ with the following output.. ?
 
 sudo /sbin/biosdevname -d
 sudo /usr/sbin/dmidecode
 sudo /usr/sbin/biosdecode
 lspci -tv

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720068


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: orphaning xine-lib, EOL'ing phonon-backend-xine

2011-06-11 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Kevin Kofler wrote:

 there's one third-party KDE-Platform-based application still using
 xine-lib for the foreseeable future: Kaffeine.

kaffeine has begun to look kind of shabby. I always installed it, as xine 
appeared to have the most complete set of codecs. Can other programs now deal 
with everything that xine/kaffeine was a fallback for? (Sorry, I have no actual 
examples, off the top of my head)

xine-lib is a requisite for xine-lib-extras-freeworld. Will amarok be using a 
different library to play mp3 in f16?

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: orphaning xine-lib, EOL'ing phonon-backend-xine

2011-06-11 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
John5342 wrote:

 Hence xine-lib-extras-freeworld should make no difference to amarok when
 using the default backend anyway. You probably want gstreamer-plugins-* in
 f15+ (or whenever phonon-backend-gstreamer became the default) unless you
 changed the back end manually.

Oh, so you mean I never needed to install xine-lib-extras-freeworld, since I am 
using phonon-backend-gstreamer? I can get amarok to play mp3, assuming I have 
all of the gstreamer-plugins-* installed?

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: orphaning xine-lib, EOL'ing phonon-backend-xine

2011-06-11 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:

 John5342 wrote:
 
 Hence xine-lib-extras-freeworld should make no difference to amarok when
 using the default backend anyway. You probably want gstreamer-plugins-*
 in f15+ (or whenever phonon-backend-gstreamer became the default) unless
 you changed the back end manually.
 

I guess it works. I just uninstalled xine-lib-extras-freeworld and amarok is 
fine. I haven't tried any video players, yet, but all looks good so far.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: orphaning xine-lib, EOL'ing phonon-backend-xine

2011-06-11 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
John5342 wrote:

 I forget which one exactly contains the mp3 plugin

gstreamer-plugins-ugly, I believe

 i just install all of them and then i don't have to worry about any
 other format i may one day come across.

ditto

 The same plugins are also used by just about every other form of KDE
 based audio/video. That includes everything from video players like
 Dragon to audio players like Amarok to System Notifications etc.

Curious. I thought Dragon must use xine-lib, since both kdemultimedia and 
kdebase-runtime require it in F15.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Fedora 15 / Gnome 3 gotchas

2011-05-07 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Denys Vlasenko wrote:

 Gnome 3 is a usability disaster.

I rather like Gnome3. I am a KDE user and through Gnome3, I have managed to 
discover all kinds of things in KDE that I never knew were there or never knew 
how to use. Gnome3 is kind of like a simplified KDE4 (imagine a different 
activity on each virtual desktop and no plasmoids and no desktop layouts, just 
straight, with wallpaper and nothing else).

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-29 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Lennart Poettering wrote:

 Hmm, the problems you pointed out, which ones of those remain? Can you
 please file a bug about those! (unless you already did so?)
 
They are all solved.

dnsmasq was not caching because I forgot to tell it not to use the default 
resolv.conf, 
but rather to use 127.0.0.1.

As for kde not shutting down, it does now, having applied systemd-8-3.


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-29 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Kevin Kofler wrote:

 What KDM does is that it runs (as root, like all of KDM) the command given
 by its HaltCmd option, which defaults to its HALT_CMD macro, which is
 defined on GNU/Linux as /sbin/halt. However, I see that we override this
 in our default kdmrc in kde-settings-kdm as HaltCmd=/sbin/poweroff.
 
I don't know which update did it, perhaps systemd-8-3, but it now works. So 
does 
poweroff from the command line.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Matthew Miller wrote:

 
 What do the logs say?
 
 Where are the logs? I looked in /var/log/ last night and there is no 
system.log or 
systemd.log file on my system.


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Thanks Rahul and Martin (other posts in this thread) :)

Bill Nottingham wrote:

 Petrus de Calguarium said:
 1. I noticed that one can no longer (with v8-2) turn off the computer by
 clicking the 'turn off computer' button in KDE. I figured out, with help
 of recent threads, that one has to run: systemctl isolate
 poweroff.target. It worked. Is this the correct way?
 
 That is a way. The KDE button should still work - what is it actually
 doing? (Generally, invoking shutdown/reboot/etc is probably the easiest
 way.)

OK, I just updated to v8-3 and have the latest initscripts, too. I tried to 
shut down 
twice (I invoked sudo systemctl daemon-reexec before the second time), and I 
still 
cannot power down by clicking on the power off button. The screen goes black, 
but the 
mouse pointer remains on the black screen and is movable, but nothing further 
occurs. 
I have to go to a different virtual terminal, log in as root, and run systemctl 
isolate poweroff.target. Then, it powers off.

 
 2. I use privoxy as a proxy and dnsmasq for dns cacheing. Previously, I
 issued: service dnsmasq start ; service privoxy start. I presume I must
 now run: systemctl start dnsmasq.service ; systemctl start
 privoxy.service. Is this correct?
 
 If you've got the latest packages, either should work.
 

I don't think this is working, either. I ran systemctl start dnsmasq.service ; 
systemctl start privoxy.service and got no error messages. I opened firefox and 
was 
able to navigate to a web page, so it seems that privoxy is working, otherwise 
it 
would block loading pages.

However, dnsmasq does not appear to be working correctly. When I run dig si.com 
it 
says 30 seconds the first time and 29 seconds every time thereafter and the 
lights on 
my router flash, meaning it is getting the information from the web. Normally, 
the 
second time running dig si.com should be 0 seconds and no flashing lights on 
the 
router.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:

Forget the BS about dnsmasq not cacheing! I forgot to change /etc/resolv.conf 
and was 
still using the old one that uses the default nameservers.

So, the problem reduces to the Shut Off Computer button in KDE not working.


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Matthew Miller wrote:

 And what do the shutdown and poweroff commands do?
 
OK, I'm back.

I ran shutdown (forgot to add -h now), so it took a bit, from within konsole. 
It shut 
off the system, without running plymouth.

To speed things up, I appended 3 (Lennard wrote that you can still to this) to 
the 
kernel boot line in grub and ran poweroff. The system ran plymouth and powered 
off.

Now, I'm back and started dnsmasq and privoxy again, no errors, but dig shows 
that 
dnsmasq is not cacheing.

Where are the logs for systemd? In /var/log/messages, maybe?


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:

 dnsmasq does not appear to be working correctly.

This is odd. systemctl and systemctl status dnsmasq.service both show dnsmasq 
as active 
(running), but it is not cacheing. Could it be that it's not reading 
/etc/dnsmasq.conf? 
No, I don't think so (Privoxy does appear to be reading it's customized 
user.action 
file).



-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Bill Nottingham wrote:

 OK. So the question is ... what does this button do? Invoke 'halt'?
 Invoke 'shutdown -h now'? Invoke ConsoleKit's Stop() method?
 
Do I need to look in the logs for this? :-)

I think this is a question for the KDE guys, non?


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Matthew Miller wrote:

 It doesn't log separately -- it uses syslog. So look in the
 /var/log/messages file.
 
You know, I'm getting the hang of systemd. I like. I hope we're not going back 
to sysv, 
despite the grumbling. I just converted my scripts and this is easier, I think.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-27 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Brendan Jones - I.T. wrote:

   On 08/27/2010 10:11 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
 Where are the logs for systemd? In /var/log/messages, maybe?
 I add systemd.log_target=kmsg systemd.log_level=debug as kernel
 parameters to flesh out logging in /var/log/messages
 
Thanks. I think it is not required anymore, because the daemon problem was due 
to my own 
error.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


applied, non-theoretical use of systemd

2010-08-26 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
1. I noticed that one can no longer (with v8-2) turn off the computer by 
clicking the 
'turn off computer' button in KDE. I figured out, with help of recent threads, 
that one 
has to run: systemctl isolate poweroff.target. It worked. Is this the correct 
way?

2. I use privoxy as a proxy and dnsmasq for dns cacheing. Previously, I issued: 
service 
dnsmasq start ; service privoxy start. I presume I must now run: systemctl 
start 
dnsmasq.service ; systemctl start privoxy.service. Is this correct?


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: How many lost users is an acceptable loss in exchange for systemd?

2010-08-25 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Gregory Maxwell wrote:

 To say it bluntly:  Any significant infrastructural change _will_ cost
 Fedora some users in the short term.
 

I'm not lost.

I am using F14α as my day-to-day system since the weekend. I am considering 
putting F14α 
on my laptop, too, so goodbye F13. I have experienced no problems whatsoever 
that could 
in any way be attributed to systemd, AFAICT (some minor video compositing 
glitches, a 
few spambayes, gnome-keyring crashes, that's about it).

I trust that the developers know more than I know. They haven't left me lying 
yet. Novel 
ideas and the brainpower to be able to implement them are what make Fedora 
stand out 
from the other distros.


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

mcelog errors

2010-08-22 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
The mcelog script in cron.hourly runs hourly and, hourly, I get system mail 
stating that 
a device does not exist. This is a regression, as this error was present in 
rawhide 
before f13 came out, and now, in f14α, it is back.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: mcelog errors

2010-08-22 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Michael Schwendt wrote:

 Bugs are to be reported in bugzilla, e.g. via this convenient link:
 http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/mcelog

Thanks. It appears that there are a number of bug reports already opened on 
exactly this 
problem.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: F14 TC2 x86_64b

2010-08-03 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:

 The workaround is to choose Install with basic video driver.

 
 Or, pass nomodeset to the kernel...

I tried both nomodeset and the basic video driver.

In both cases, the boot hangs at:

Waiting for hardware to initialize...

It hangs here forever and the CD/DVD drive keeps spinning with its LED lit, but 
nothing happens.

I switch to vt3 and observe the following message (in both nomodeset and basic 
video driver cases):

Error inserting floppy: no such device

Note: I don't even have a floppy!

How do I get past this???


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Harmless KDE feature upgrades - yeah right

2010-03-04 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Juha Tuomala wrote:

 For all those who say that latest stuff is the 
reason why
 I use Fedora!!!1, there is rawhide for you.
 
I have tried this, but that is not possible. 
Generally, a few weeks after the release of a new 
fedora, rawhide becomes unusable for a while, 
even unbootable. My last try went pretty well, 
lasting from the time fedora 12 was released 
until about 3 weeks ago, when rawhide just hung 
and I could not even yum updates or log in. In my 
experience of a few years of trying Rawhide, it 
becomes usable again around the time of the 
release of the alpha release, which is the time I 
generally switch.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: To semi-rolling or not to semi-rolling, that is the question...

2010-03-04 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Doug Ledford wrote:

 [the whole nine yards]

I like this idea. As a user of fedora updates-
testing and kde-redhat, in order to get the 
latest software the soonest onto my computer, 
without having the burden of reinstalling my 
system twice a year on 2 computers, x86_64 
desktop and i686/PAE laptop, I like the idea of 
being able to run rawhide perpetually (and not 
having it get into such a conundrum that one day 
it will no longer even boot, due to some bad yum 
update). I had flippantly proposed 'fedora 
infinity' a year or two back on this list and it 
was shot down :-( I was told that I should look 
into sidux or arch linux, I think. Sorry, I'm not 
into building my system from scratch and 
appreciate the fantastic work here and, were 
rawhide to always work while always being on the 
edge of the latest development, and no longer 
having to reinstall twice a year, i.e., having 
rawhide become a de facto rolling release, I 
would be thrilled with it!!!


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Heads up: X server configuration changes

2010-02-16 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Peter Hutterer wrote:

 ...

Thanks for the 'Heads Up'. As I had said so long ago, I couldn't possibly read 
every 
developer's blog to find out what I must do to avoid inevitable doom after 
updating 
my system and not taking the required configuration measures -- that I would 
only 
know about, had I read the blog.

Since most of us have no xorg.conf anymore, we likely don't have to do anything.

Excellent work !! ;-)

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Unable to start X

2010-01-25 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Paul F. Johnson wrote:

 Ta Ta For Now

I haven't heard that for a while. Yes, we use that here in .ca sometimes, too.

 It's only me, only me and no-one else.

ditto


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel