On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:18 -0400, JT wrote:
>
> > How are you downloading RHEL ISO images?
>
> I already sent you the URL in a prior response:
> https://developers.redhat.com/products/rhel/download
>
> > Please do not tell me to take a deep breath and relax. Show some respect.
>
> I am
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 17:39 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 5:09 PM Philip Wyett
> wrote:
>
> > It has much to do. Fedora is a community apparently Red Hat no longer
> > needs. The now ELN
> > backend
> > can satisfy pre testing and coul
like this, there will be thousands of people that will
> come together to work
> around everything Red Hat attempts to put in place to block people.
>
> Don't worry, take a deep breath and relax, the code will remain open source
> and it will remain
> freely available.
>
&g
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:58 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 4:07 PM Philip Wyett
> wrote:
> > Let us face it our efforts with the Fedora project are not valued and it is
> > a means nothing to
> > the
> > new corporate IBM/Red Hat enterprise sy
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:49 -0400, JT wrote:
> > I believe the GPL asks you never have to make agreement to access GPL code.
>
> Correct. Per the GPL if you have the binary you have a legal right to the
> code.
> Also the GPL does contain clauses that stipulate that outside agreements
>
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:49 -0400, JT wrote:
> > I believe the GPL asks you never have to make agreement to access GPL code.
>
> Correct. Per the GPL if you have the binary you have a legal right to the
> code.
> Also the GPL does contain clauses that stipulate that outside agreements
>
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:26 -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 21:06:40 +0100, you wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Obviously many will have seen:
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
> >
> > and see, where EL (contributors like you of
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:23 -0400, JT wrote:
> Red Hat doesn't need to mention it. It's a legal requirement of the GPL...
> anyone using the
> binaries has legal right to the source code.
>
> As for Red Hat cancelling users accounts who pull the source build binaries
> and share it...
>
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 16:10 -0400, JT wrote:
> > I see an impasse here. Why contribute to fedora when Red Hat will lock it
> > down in other
> products?
>
> They literally cannot "Lock it down" due to the GPL. Anyone using RHEL
> binaries has legal right
> to the code.
> What they seem to
Hi all,
Obviously many will have seen:
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
and see, where EL (contributors like you of fedora/EPEL) have been knocked down:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215299
Let us face it our efforts with the Fedora project are
On Wed, 2023-06-21 at 12:33 -0500, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> If you'll add me as admin/owner on the packages I'll continue to maintain
> them. FAS jonathanspw
>
> Especially interested in remmina since I use it nearly every day.
>
>
Hi,
I have added you with commit access for now
Hi all,
After the announcement below today.
https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/furthering-evolution-centos-stream
I will be in 5 days detaching myself and orphaning all packages I have
involvement with.
Regards
Phil
--
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***
Associations:
* Debian
On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 09:40 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 05:04:19PM +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 17:35 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 12:01 PM Philip Wyett
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 18:01 -0400, JT wrote:
> In the original post, I took private to mean its own dedicated list... not
> that it'd be hidden
> from view from everyone. IMHO everything with Fedora should be in the open.
> Bugs should be
> reported upstream, so I dont see why there would need
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 22:36 +, Maxwell G wrote:
> On Mon Jun 19, 2023 at 22:20 +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 21:32 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > With the growing number of multime
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 23:39 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Philip Wyett [19/06/2023 22:20] :
> > Private mailing list? No part of this project should have private anything
> > IMHO.
>
> Bug reports can explain security flaws and lead to exploits. They can
> a
On Mon, 2023-06-19 at 21:32 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello!
>
> With the growing number of multimedia packages in Fedora, mostly owing
> to the introduction of ffmpeg package and Legal permission to enable
> and ship many popular codecs, I think we've reached the critical
On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 17:35 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 12:01 PM Philip Wyett
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After completing a package-review for belcard[1], I tried to create the
> > repo, seems that the
> > repo
> > after a co
Hi,
After completing a package-review for belcard[1], I tried to create the repo,
seems that the repo
after a couple of attempts got created, but is owned by 'releng-bot' and not
myself 'kathenas'. How
can I get this resolved?
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211811
Regards
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 08:56 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 8:50 AM Philip Wyett
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 07:50 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:52 PM Ali Erdinc Koroglu
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> &g
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 07:50 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 2:52 PM Ali Erdinc Koroglu
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 27/05/2023 15:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > * Kevin Fenzi:
> > >
> > > > Today we have packager groups used in src.fedoraproject.org to allow a
> > > > group of
Hi all,
In the effort to update the very outdated linphone stack and related software.
In the next day or
so the libosip2 package will receive its first major update in Fedora since
2013 that will include
a soname bump.
Regards
Phil
--
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***
Hi all,
Once upon a time...
One day a fedora packager found libosip2 orphaned and decided it needed some
love and adopted it.
Little did he know the rabbit hole he was about to go down. ;-)
All things lead to linphone and as a result I have adopted:
- libosip2
- libeXosip2
- linphone
An
On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 21:03 +, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-tenacity ?
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
On Mon, 2023-01-02 at 17:02 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 11:07 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> gfbgraph
As gfbgraph is a dep of gnome-maps, I have taken this one.
Regards
Phil
--
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***
Associations:
* Debian Maintainer (DM)
* Fedora/EPEL Maintainer.
* Contributor member of the
Hi all,
Bug link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058475
I have posted the bug report above and emailed the maintainer directly offering
to co-maintain the
package concerned - rednotebook. No responses at all, though the maintainer is
active.
If Fabian Affolter
On Mon, 2022-03-14 at 08:10 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-03-13 at 11:30 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Recommendation: Third-party applications should limit themselves to
> > depending on standard icon names listed at
> >
Hi,
Before the bug reports start, I thought I would ask opinion here as not my real
area of knowledge.
It seems that many applications running on GNOME under f36 and rawhide are
having icon issues.
Example 1: Under GNOME, rednotebook has no menu bar icons.
Example 2: Pitivi will fail to
On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 16:55 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> and what is the problem now ?
> ___
>
Hi,
You started this thread with supposed build failures. the -2 version of the
mass f36 rebuild is a
failure. Leave that as we have all have had issues
On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 16:46 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> what is the latest version ?
> ___
>
Hi,
Going by the list on that page. You did a successful rawhide build of:
Carla-2.4.1-3.fc36 today.
On Sat, 2022-01-29 at 14:02 +, Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when building Carla on rawhide the compilation fails with the following error
> message [1]:
>
> Compiling juce_gui_basics.cpp
> In file included from juce_gui_basics.cpp:265:
> native/x11/juce_linux_XWindowSystem.cpp: In member
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 19:41 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 7:39 PM Philip Wyett
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 00:26 +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031376
> > >
> > > Fedora
On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 00:38 +, Philip Wyett wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 00:26 +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031376
> >
> > Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
> > changed:
> >
On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 00:26 +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031376
>
> Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
> changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 11:34 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:00 AM Philip Wyett
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 07:40 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 4:16 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia
> > > wrote:
> > > > On
On Sat, 2021-12-18 at 07:40 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 4:16 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 1:55 PM Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I'm glad I can announce that we have a new release of Mock. See the full
> > > release notes [1].
On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 15:10 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 22. 11. 21 15:00, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > - builds will require a valid Red Hat subscription (the no-cost variant is
> >OK as well, though [2])
>
> I cannot help myself but I consider this very unpleasant for EPEL packagers.
>
>
38 matches
Mail list logo
