smc-fonts upstream changed license of AnjaliOldLipi fonts from GPL+ to
OFL 1.1. The update will be in smc-fonts-6.1-3 package.
--
Rajeesh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 October 2014 10:22, pravin@gmail.com pravin@gmail.com wrote:
Will be very helpful if you can add how to test information as well. i.e.
after local install package will appear in gnome-software something in
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 October 2014 12:55, Rajeesh K Nambiar rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com wrote:
smc-fonts failed to process with 'unrecognized contents' message
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hughsie/createrepo_as_logs/master/s/smc
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:22 AM, pravin@gmail.com
pravin@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 October 2014 15:14, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
If you maintain a font in Fedora, or are a provenpackager, I could
really need your help this weekend. Basically, we want to implement
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Roberto Ragusa m...@robertoragusa.it wrote:
Bluez4 and Bluez5 are not parallel-installable, and incompatible, so
other applications relying on Bluez4 will need to be ported by their
respective maintainers.
Impact on KDE?
Probably not much as the upstream
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've reported a X11 bug system, I'm using KDE on F15, if you suffers
the same problem, it could be great take a look at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726982
Sorry if it's duplicated
I assume you have an
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Raghu Siddarth raghusidda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am packaging a program that has two front ends, one for Gtk and other for
Qt.
Is there a standard packaging structure to handle such packages?
I guess you can take a look at how transmission does this...
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
Having been not terribly impressed with GNOME 3 in F-15 alpha, I thought
I'd try installing the beta with KDE, just to see if the grass is any
greener. I'm still trying to find my way around that one too, but
I've run into one
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Hi,
For GNOME 3 to more reliably do application tracking, we will be
associating through startup-notification. Some background here:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/2010-February/011321.html
However for
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Rajeesh K Nambiar
rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Peter Hutterer
peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote:
Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
Any pointers on how to migrate the 'enable touchpad tap-to-click'
feature from the existing .fdi
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/05/2010 10:16 AM, Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
Does that mean if Fedora N is released with KDE 4.x, the users get
4.x+1 only in Fedora N+1? It sounds diagonally opposite to the
latest-and-greatest, bleeding edge policy
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Thomas Janssen
thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Thomas Janssen
thom...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Rajeesh K Nambiar
rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Rahul Sundaram
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
I must be looking at the wrong places then... I could find no 4.4+
RPMs either in one of the mirrors:
http://apt.de.kde-redhat.org/kde-redhat/fedora/12/i386/unstable/RPMS/
4.4.0 is already
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
[...]
3. adjust plans/policy wrt kde upgrades.
a. implement kde stability proposal as is (to limit 4.x type upgrades to at
most one per fedora release)
b. simply do new 4.x versions only for fn+1? pros: less chance to
14 matches
Mail list logo
