f34 - llvm12 update
Hi folks, we're preparing an update of the LLVM package from 12.0.0rc1 to 12.0.0. In addition the package the llvm team maintain, the following packages needs a rebuild: annobin-0:9.65 bindgen-0:0.57.0 clazy-0:1.9 doxygen-1:1.9.1 gnome-builder-0:3.40.0 mesa-dri-drivers-0:21.0.2 mesa-libOSMesa-0:21.0.2 mesa-vulkan-drivers-0:21.0.2 postgresql-llvmjit-0:13.2 qt-creator-0:4.14.1 qt6-doctools-0:6.0.3 qt6-linguist-0:6.0.3 Once the llvm packaes are all rebuit, we will push these rebuilds in the side-tag f34-build-side-41029. Feel free to contact sguel...@redhat.com and tstel...@redhat.com if you have any question/remark. ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
f34 - llvm12 update
Hi folks, we're preparing an update of the LLVM package from 12.0.0rc1 to 12.0.0. In addition the package the llvm team maintain, the following packages needs a rebuild: annobin-0:9.65 bindgen-0:0.57.0 clazy-0:1.9 doxygen-1:1.9.1 gnome-builder-0:3.40.0 mesa-dri-drivers-0:21.0.2 mesa-libOSMesa-0:21.0.2 mesa-vulkan-drivers-0:21.0.2 postgresql-llvmjit-0:13.2 qt-creator-0:4.14.1 qt6-doctools-0:6.0.3 qt6-linguist-0:6.0.3 Once the llvm packaes are all rebuit, we will push these rebuilds in the side-tag f34-build-side-41029. Feel free to contact sguel...@redhat.com and tstel...@redhat.com if you have any question/remark. ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Debugging ppc64le
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 12:51:54AM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 06/02/2019 00:47, Christoph Junghans wrote: > > >While packaging up votca-csg-1.5, I ran into some tests failing: > >https://github.com/votca/csg/issues/326 > >but this only happens on ppc64le under epel7. (So I expect boost-1.53 > >being the culprit!) > > > >Is there a good way (qemu or something) to debug this interactively? > > You can use one of the test machines: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers > > The ppc64le one is F28 but if you can't reproduce it there then > you can use mock to get an EPEL7 environment. I've been in the same situation to debug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672630 And I ended up asking for an account on https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/, they do have a few ppc machine available. Hop it helps ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Attempt to update ispc
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:36:22AM -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > Upstream ispc updated to 1.10.0. Unfortunately, the build failed with > broken clang++ compiler according to koji > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32150411) > > Can someone investigate the issue? This package is needed by embree, a > dependency for both Blender, luxcorerender and Yafaray. > > Thanks > > Luya > Hi Luya, Clang does not support the -fstack-clash-protection flag. We used to silently ignore that flag but it's no longer the case. Why are you using clang to compile the package? The safe step is to use gcc, ot if clang is needed, to strip -fstack-clash-protection from the flags passed to clang, but that's not future-proof (clang may end up supporting that flag). Hope it helps, Serge ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: clang and Fedora's default C/CXX flags
On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 12:31:50PM -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 01/03/2019 12:28 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > On 1/3/19 2:49 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > >> Part of Fedora's default C/CXX flags include -fstack-clash-protection > >> but clang does not support this flag and has until a few weeks ago[1] > >> silently ignored the flag. > >> > >> What are clang apps who use Fedora's default flags supposed to do? > >> Are there clang default flag macros? > >> > >> Thanks, Michael > >> > >> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658311 > > > > You should reach out to Tom or Serge for comments :-) > > > > The recommended solution for now is to filter out flags that clang does > not support. > > See for example: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libcxx/blob/master/f/libcxx.spec#_60 > If the goal is to harden the binary without much performance overhead, clang also proposes some unique flags, maybe it is worth considering them? https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SafeStack.html looks like a decent choice. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org