; some of them can be linked to existing known issues which are yet to be fixed
> so I
> didn't send that list to Chris Murphy and Stasiek Michalski yet and might not
> do so.
> Not publicly at least. Some of the issues have been fixed but not yet present
> in openSUSE
> L
> This has happened to me because OpenSUSE and Jolla's Sailfish OS use btrfs as
> their
> default file system. I've tried using btrfs from time to time in various
> environments
> to see how it's progressing. However there hasn't been fixes for long-standing
> issues in btrfs when it comes to des
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 8:05 PM Stasiek Michalski wrote:
>
> Can you elaborate on the sorts of reasons you'd need the pre rolled
> back versus the post? I imagine one is more common to use as a
> rollback than the other.
Post is usually used when something else goes w
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 6:47 PM Stasiek Michalski wrote:
>
> I wonder to what degree some of the problems, especially enospc bugs,
> were exacerbated by a somewhat small root for btrfs combined with a
> fairly aggressive snapshotting regime by default? I agree with the
> &q
> On Sat, 2020-06-27 at 22:59 +0000, Stasiek Michalski wrote:
>
> (Hi LCP I hope life is good)
> That's great to hear, just a few questions.
> Lately, how would you rate that in number of years?
The change to partitioning occurred in November of 2018 iirc, so it's
ov
> On 27 June 2020 17:55:09 CEST, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> The actual data I will never ever be able to share. I have ended my time at
> that
> particular company but even when I was there I was not permitted to share
> such data. Or
> did you mean data from openSUSE and Arch?
> Just have a look
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:26 AM Stasiek Michalski wrote:
>
> Why is it disappointing? The Pagure project isn't suddenly being
> removed from the internet. Is there a reason you can't contribute to
> it to add the features you need?
I can add features, sure, and I d
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:10 pm, Adam Williamson
>
> $100/month per user for Ultimate (the only offering that meets the
> "requirements")... 2339 packages in FAS... so $233900 * 12 works out to
> roughly $3 million per year just for Fedora, assuming we never let
> anybody other than approve
