[EPEL-devel] Becoming maintainer for pdsh for EPEL - unresponsive maintainer

2021-06-01 Thread Trey Dockendorf
I have opened a bugzilla to get an EPEL8 branch for pdsh [1], and I've also reached out to the current maintainers directly and have not heard anything back. I am not sure what the next steps are in getting an EPEL8 build of pdsh. I would be happy to become the maintainer of the EPEL builds for

Unresponsive maintainer for pdsh package

2021-05-25 Thread Trey Dockendorf
I'd like to report what I think is an unresponsive maintainer for the pdsh package. I opened a bugzilla to get an EPEL8 branch created: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1960006 and have gotten no response from that or from direct emails to maintainers. I would be happy to become a

Re: Unresponsive maintainer for genders package

2021-05-02 Thread Trey Dockendorf
I believe this is the upstream: https://github.com/chaos/genders It may have origins at LLNL but not entirely sure. I do know the chaos org on github hosts several HPC related applications like pdsh and powerman. There is now a EPEL8 build in testing repos. - Trey On Sun, May 2, 2021, 9:19 PM

[EPEL-devel] Is it possible to have openldap in EPEL8?

2021-04-30 Thread Trey Dockendorf
I sent an email to what I hope is email address for Fedora openldap maintainers for epel8 branch but then I realized that might not be possible. It appears like RHEL8 ships the openldap and openldap-clients packages buts purposely leaves out openldap-servers. So given that some RPMs exist and

Unresponsive maintainer for genders package

2021-04-30 Thread Trey Dockendorf
I'd like to report what I think is an unresponsive maintainer for the genders package. Per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/ I filed this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955798 There do not appear to be any other bugs open

[EPEL-devel] Re: Getting conman into EPEL8

2021-04-21 Thread Trey Dockendorf
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:07 PM Dave Love wrote: > For what it's worth, there's a conman build for x86_64 and aarch64 in > the loveshack/livhpc copr (untested). > ___ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send

[EPEL-devel] Re: Getting conman into EPEL8

2021-04-13 Thread Trey Dockendorf
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:41 AM Dan Horák wrote: > > > > I have Fedora accounts that I setup many years ago and honestly don't > > recall if I was ever setup to be a packager for Fedora. If there is a way > > to verify if I am setup as a packager I'd be happy to check, but most > > likely I am

[EPEL-devel] Re: Getting conman into EPEL8

2021-04-13 Thread Trey Dockendorf
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:25 AM Dan Horák wrote: > Hi Trey, > > On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:15:08 - > treyd...@gmail.com wrote: > > > It appears like RHEL8 dropped conman RPMs but they do exist in Fedora > and appear to be receiving updates. I found a wiki page that said to > contact the

[EPEL-devel] Re: incompatibility issue for mate-desktop

2018-04-25 Thread Trey Dockendorf
Could look into Pulp, https://pulpproject.org/, which I've used in the past to freeze a copy of EPEL locally to avoid updates when I needed to keep systems frozen on specific minor releases of CentOS. Pulp allowed me to efficiently create multiple copies of the EPEL repos that I could point my

Re: EPEL zabbix for EL7

2014-07-25 Thread Trey Dockendorf
Any update on this, or how can the status be viewed? On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: FYI - I've untagged the old zabbix-2.2 package from epel7. We will be going solely with zabbixXX named packages for epel7. Hopefully we'll have them pushed