Re: Missing dependency in Fedora 35 - bug 2097817
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 04:15:35PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17 2022 at 02:00:14 PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi > wrote: > > Nope, it has to stay forever. Sorry. > > Hi, can you explain why? Since we do not maintain upgrade paths from one > release to the next anymore, and instead require use of system upgrade, I > would have assumed that epoch would only have to stay for the life of a > particular Fedora release? I suppose it could be feasable to do it for packages that nothing has any dependencies on. But for packages that do, there would be a lot of churn adjusting the deps every cycle, it would prevent merges back to older branches and just cause confusion. IMHO. If we want to allow this, it should at least have a clear checklist/guideline on how to do things because I think it would be easy to get wrong. :( kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Missing dependency in Fedora 35 - bug 2097817
On Fri, Jun 17 2022 at 02:00:14 PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Nope, it has to stay forever. Sorry. Hi, can you explain why? Since we do not maintain upgrade paths from one release to the next anymore, and instead require use of system upgrade, I would have assumed that epoch would only have to stay for the life of a particular Fedora release? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Missing dependency in Fedora 35 - bug 2097817
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:38:19AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Thursday, 16 June 2022 17.55.45 WEST Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > I need to downgrade python-reportlab in Fedora 35 for a missing runtime > > dependency. What's the most accurate way? > > > > Bug ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097817 > > Update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-23aefe21ad > > > > Regards. > > Not to be the bad news bringer but I think that the only way is to use epoch > in the spec file. And to rebuild with a higher epoch. > > Something that I do not remember is what to do the with the other releases. > Are we still forced, in order to ensure an upgrade path, to keep the epoch? > > Or can we assume that system-upgrade will allow to get rid of that artifact > (of all the things I could call to epoch I think that this is the nicest). :-) Nope, it has to stay forever. Sorry. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Missing dependency in Fedora 35 - bug 2097817
On Thursday, 16 June 2022 17.55.45 WEST Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > Hi all. > > I need to downgrade python-reportlab in Fedora 35 for a missing runtime > dependency. What's the most accurate way? > > Bug ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097817 > Update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-23aefe21ad > > Regards. Not to be the bad news bringer but I think that the only way is to use epoch in the spec file. And to rebuild with a higher epoch. Something that I do not remember is what to do the with the other releases. Are we still forced, in order to ensure an upgrade path, to keep the epoch? Or can we assume that system-upgrade will allow to get rid of that artifact (of all the things I could call to epoch I think that this is the nicest). :-) Regards, -- José Abílio___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Missing dependency in Fedora 35 - bug 2097817
Hi all. I need to downgrade python-reportlab in Fedora 35 for a missing runtime dependency. What's the most accurate way? Bug ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097817 Update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-23aefe21ad Regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
