On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 20:26:29 +0530, Manas Mangaonkar wrote:
> I am taking this.
Thanks Manas. Until we get you sponsored to the packagers group, you can
only do unofficial reviews. So, you cannot approve the package at the
moment. I welcome the unofficial review, of course :)
--
Thanks,
I am taking this.
On Sat, Nov 3, 2018, 8:20 PM Ankur Sinha Here is another package that needs review. Happy to swap a review for
> it too.
>
> python-duecredit:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645768
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Regards,
>
> Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
>
>
Here is another package that needs review. Happy to swap a review for
it too.
python-duecredit:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645768
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Description:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 05:38:52 -, Raphael Groner wrote:
> Hi Ankur,
Hi Raphael,
> I could look into your review requests later.
>
> Maybe we can do a review swap with python-slacker and slack-cleaner?
> Currently, I am working on both of them but not yet finished to have
> it ready for
Hi Ankur,
I could look into your review requests later.
Maybe we can do a review swap with python-slacker and slack-cleaner? Currently,
I am working on both of them but not yet finished to have it ready for review.
https://github.com/os/slacker
https://github.com/kfei/slack-cleaner
Hello,
Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I've got two more python
packages that are now ready for review:
- python-fslpy: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645329
- python-fsleyes-widgets: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645661
One can follow the NeuroFedora
Hello,
I'd like to ask your assistance to review some packages, in exchange of yours.
2 C++ packages recently featured in FedoraMagazine:
https://fedoramagazine.org/better-image-upscaling-waifu2x/
- Review Request: waifu2x-converter-cpp - Image Super-Resolution for
Anime-style art using
I fifth that...
Because he was the only guy from Fedora project, who gave me feed-back
about my proposal for a new package :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/avigne/pcb-rnd/
Thank you Robert-André.
--
Alain V.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:12
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, 13:07 Alois Mahdal wrote:
>
>
> On 07/09/2018 12:36 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM Robert-André Mauchin
> wrote:
> >> I took care of:
> >>
> >> - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012
> >> - lfsc:
On 07/09/2018 12:36 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>> I took care of:
>>
>> - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012
>> - lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013
>> - symfpu:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, Jerry James wrote:
I took care of:
- cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012
- lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013
- symfpu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599014
I would like to give a shout out to Robert-André for
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> I took care of:
>
> - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012
> - lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013
> - symfpu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599014
I would like to give a
I took care of:
- cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012
- lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013
- symfpu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599014
___
devel mailing list --
A new version of cvc4 is available. It depends on cryptominisat 5.x
instead of 4.x. Since cvc4 was the last consumer of cryptominisat 4.x
in Fedora, this means that we can finally retire the cryptominisat4
package.
On the other hand, cvc4 1.6 has new dependencies. I get to add 4
packages in
On mardi 20 mars 2018 23:35:04 CET djb djb wrote:
> Ok..I'll do json one when I get home
>
> On Mar 20, 2018 5:19 PM, "Jared K. Smith" wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith
> >
> > wrote:
> >> I have done all of them
Ok..I'll do json one when I get home
On Mar 20, 2018 5:19 PM, "Jared K. Smith" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith
> wrote:
>
>> I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-
>> unofficial and
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith
wrote:
> I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-
> unofficial and golang-github-bitly-simplejson .
>
I've now finished golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-unofficial as well.
-Jared
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:38 PM, djb djb wrote:
> Jared, which ones have you so far?
>
I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-unofficial
and golang-github-bitly-simplejson .
> I would like to do:
>
> Review Request: golang-github-bitly-simplejson
Jared, which ones have you so far?
I would like to do:
Review Request: golang-github-bitly-simplejson - Go package to interact
with arbitrary JSON
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
show_bug.cgi?id=1555345
if you have not done that one so far.
Thanks
On Sat,
Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 à 17:33 -0400, Jared K. Smith a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Robert-André Mauchin com> wrote:
> > I'm looking for some help to review some Golang packages. These are
> > all renamed packages to conform with the new Golang guidelines which
>
On vendredi 16 mars 2018 22:33:42 CET Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Robert-André Mauchin
>
> wrote:
> > I'm looking for some help to review some Golang packages. These are all
> > renamed packages to conform with the new Golang guidelines which
> >
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> I'm looking for some help to review some Golang packages. These are all
> renamed packages to conform with the new Golang guidelines which
> standardizes package names. These are super simple devel only package
Hello,
I'm looking for some help to review some Golang packages. These are all renamed
packages to conform with the new Golang guidelines which standardizes package
names. These are super simple devel only package and shouldn't pose any issue.
Of course I'm available for any review in
Hello good folks,
A developer tasked me with packaging his small CLI tools so I have a few
reviews waiting. They are extremely trivial packages, often a simple Python
script or single C file. Here is the list:
- Review Request: googler - Google Search, Google Site Search, Google News
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a handful of packages that I'd like to be reviewed. I'm available for
> any reviews you want in exchange (to the best of my ability).
Hello,
I'm happy to take ddgr and QEverCloud. Are you willing
Hello,
I have a handful of packages that I'd like to be reviewed. I'm available for
any reviews you want in exchange (to the best of my ability).
- This package was requested by Artur Iwicki on the list:
Review Request: jid - Json Incremental Digger
Hey all,
I have two reviews I'd love to get through. They're a dependency chain, but
it's a short one!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535291
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535292
The first one is the dependency, the second one is the leaf node. I'd be
happy to do
Hello fellow packagers,
I'd like to ask your help for a handful of reviews. The Golang packages were
generated by gofed and the Perl packages by cpanrpm, so they should be fairly
standard and trivial to review.
As before I offer my help in exchange for reviews, anything but PHP and Java.
Best
On mardi 7 novembre 2017 13:11:36 CET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:43:09PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> > │├── 1508060 Review Request: golang-github-kylelemons-godebug -
> > Debugging helper utilities for Go
││
> >
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 10:43:09PM +0100, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> │├── 1508060 Review Request: golang-github-kylelemons-godebug -
> Debugging helper utilities for Go
> ││ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508060
> ││
> │└──
Il 01/11/2017 16:55, Richard Shaw ha scritto:
I have a few simple C++ based review requests that I'm willing to
perform review swaps for:
flnet - Amateur Radio Net Control Station
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
flwkey - Modem program for the K1EL Winkeyer series
https
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Will Crawford
wrote:
> Can I swap you for this one (R colourscheme generator):
>
> R-RColorBrewer - Provides color schemes for maps (and other graphics)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1504825
I've taken a look but to be
ed review requests that I'm willing to perform
> review swaps for:
>
> flnet - Amateur Radio Net Control Station
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
>
> flwkey - Modem program for the K1EL Winkeyer series
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321081
>
I have a few simple C++ based review requests that I'm willing to perform
review swaps for:
flnet - Amateur Radio Net Control Station
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852
flwkey - Modem program for the K1EL Winkeyer series
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321081
On 31.10.2017 22:43, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
── 1508034 Review Request: rssguard - Simple yet powerful feed reader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508034
── 1508002 Review Request: uTox - The lightweight Tox client
│
Hello,
I've added a bunch of packages to review, I'll review yours in exchange of mine.
No Java or PHP packages as I'm not familiar with those.
Here is the list with each dependency:
── 1508034 Review Request: rssguard - Simple yet powerful feed reader
Hello,
I have a couple of packages waiting for review:
scidavis - Application for Scientific Data Analysis and Visualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490054
which depends on
liborigin3 - A library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files
On 29.08.2017 13:10, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
2017-08-29 13:02 GMT+02:00 Sandro Mani :
Hi
I have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486278
I'll take svg2svgt, if you create more review requests, just tell me.
Thanks, I've started with python-subliminal, I'll
2017-08-29 13:02 GMT+02:00 Sandro Mani :
> Hi
>
> I have
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486278
I'll take svg2svgt, if you create more review requests, just tell me.
Thanks.
___
devel mailing list --
Hi
I have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486278
as well as a big load of mingw packages [1]. If you're okay with
reviewing mingw stuff I can prepare review requests for them.
Thanks
Sandro
[1] https://github.com/manisandro/fedora-mingw
On 29.08.2017 12:31, Juan Orti
Hi, I have these python packages pending for review. Anyone interested
in a review swap?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486067
python-rebulk - ReBulk is a python library that performs advanced
searches in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486026
python-pysrt -
On 07/03/2017 04:25 PM, Ben Rosser wrote:
The three nodejs packages are still available for anyone else
interested in review swaps.
I'll look at those three if you'll look at these:
openzwave:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468766
domoticz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com
ple C/C++ MinGW packages. Deal?
>
> Thanks
> Sandro
Taken both of those, thanks!
The three nodejs packages are still available for anyone else
interested in review swaps.
Ben
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
T
Hi Ben
I'm happy to take the first two in exchange for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461368
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465676
which are simple C/C++ MinGW packages. Deal?
Thanks
Sandro
On 03.07.2017 19:58, Ben Rosser wrote:
Hi,
I have a handful of packages
Hi,
I have a handful of packages in the review queue that I'd be willing
to exchange reviews for. I'm happy to exchange for reviews of
similarly sized packages, or several for a more complicated review.
Two miscellaneous packages (C/C++):
qotd - A simple and lightweight Quote of the Day
On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 09:05:23AM +, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
Hi Fabio,
>
> I need somebody to take on the Review Requests of the only 3 golang
> dependencies that are still blocking a syncthing package:
>
> golang-github-cznic-zappy:
>
Hi everybody,
I need somebody to take on the Review Requests of the only 3 golang
dependencies that are still blocking a syncthing package:
golang-github-cznic-zappy:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431743
golang-github-cznic-lldb:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431745
Hello!
I've got a couple of easy python packages to review:
Review Request: python-fypp - Fortran preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431637
Review Request: python-mmtf - A decoding library for the macromolecular
transmission format (MMTF)
Hi,
I have two packages that need review for a
sagemath 7.6 update:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445411
[Review Request: python-cysignals - Interrupt and signal handling for Cython]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1445412
[Review Request: python-fpylll - A Python
On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 11:24 -0500, Greg Hellings wrote:
> I have a trio of reviews looking for reviewers. I'll be happy to swap
> for them. Two Python libraries, and an app that depends on them:
>
> python-camel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441841
> python-yamlordereddictloader:
I have a trio of reviews looking for reviewers. I'll be happy to swap for
them. Two Python libraries, and an app that depends on them:
python-camel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441841
python-yamlordereddictloader:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441842
linchpin:
On 03/25/2017 11:41 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> The latest version of the python-ZODB package has a couple of new
> build dependencies that aren't yet in Fedora. Both of these are very
> small, very simple packages. I'm happy to swap reviews for these two:
>
> python-j1m.sphinxautointerface:
>
The latest version of the python-ZODB package has a couple of new
build dependencies that aren't yet in Fedora. Both of these are very
small, very simple packages. I'm happy to swap reviews for these two:
python-j1m.sphinxautointerface:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435920
> 6) golang-github-cznic-fileutil - File utility functions for Go (depends on
> [2])
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431732
I will take this as well, would you take a look at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394923
?
Thanks!
--
Athos Ribeiro
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> 7) golang-github-cznic-sortutil - Supplemental utilities for Go's sort
> package (depends on [2])
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431735
>
> 8) golang-github-cznic-strutil - Supplemental utilities for
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:52:06PM +, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> 1) golang-github-edsrzf-mmap-go - Portable mmap package for Go
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431568
This is duplicated (closed)
>
> 2) golang-github-cznic-mathutil - Supplemental utilities for Go's rand and
>
Hi everybody,
I've been putting together package Review Requests for all the golang
package dependencies of syncthing (an open source file synchronization
service). Some of them have already been reviewed (thank you, Jan! I feel
much more confident about my golang packaging now), but there are
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:09:18PM -0600, Greg Hellings wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I have three outstanding package reviews that I'd be happy to swap with
> anyone who is willing and also in need. Listed in my order of need, they
> are:
>
> python-beaker:
Hi, everyone.
I have three outstanding package reviews that I'd be happy to swap with
anyone who is willing and also in need. Listed in my order of need, they
are:
python-beaker: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410594
mingw-libdb: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=885919
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> For the upgrade to python-pillow-4.0.0, I need these two packages reviewed:
Appreciate that!
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409647 - libimagequant -
> Palette quantization library
> -
Hi
For the upgrade to python-pillow-4.0.0, I need these two packages reviewed:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409647 - libimagequant -
Palette quantization library
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409648 - python-olefile -
Python package to parse, read and write
hi
Il 22/12/2016 01:24, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade ha scritto:
I have two packages for review. These should be very
simple reviews.
I've already reviewed
python-pathlib2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406962
about
python-ipykernel:
I have two packages for review. These should be very
simple reviews.
python-pathlib2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406962
python-ipykernel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406958
Thanks,
Paulo
___
devel mailing list --
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> gap-pkg-hapcryst: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378526
> gap-pkg-xmod: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399365
I still need reviews for these two. I'm willing to swap reviews. Thanks,
--
I've got a couple of new package dependencies that need reviews:
prooftree: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399366
ocaml-ocplib-simplex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1399367
I've also got a couple more GAP packages waiting in the wings. These
2 are lower priority
23/11/2016 05:57, Ben Rosser ha scritto:
Anyone interested in review swaps? I have four smallish packages in
the queue, would be happy to take other smallish packages in exchange:
* quassel-irssi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374899
* golang-github-knieriem-markdown:
https
Anyone interested in review swaps? I have four smallish packages in the
queue, would be happy to take other smallish packages in exchange:
* quassel-irssi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374899
* golang-github-knieriem-markdown:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396636
Hi Björn,
Let's swap :D I've got some packages to review, just pick some ones open
in Astronomy SIG tracker :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=115
Greetings,
Christian
On 10/07/2016 09:18 PM, Björn Esser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have another three reviews to swap [1]. The first
Hello,
I have another three reviews to swap [1]. The first one in the tree is
pretty brain-dead, the other two are a bit more advanced C-compiled
packages, but not too exhausting.
Any offers?
Cheers,
Björn
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1382810_resolved=1
Hi,
I have two pending reviews that I believe should be very simple to
perform, because both packages are quite small C libraries. I worked
upstream to make them packaging-friendly.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=vmod-querystring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=libslz
Hi
Il 22/09/2016 21:49, Christoph Junghans ha scritto:
Hi,
I have a package which is in need of a review, anyone interested in a swap?
gasnet - A Portable High-Performance Communication Layer for GAS Languages
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375744
take!
Cheers,
Christoph
Hi,
I have a package which is in need of a review, anyone interested in a swap?
gasnet - A Portable High-Performance Communication Layer for GAS Languages
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375744
Cheers,
Christoph
--
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 19:46:03 -0400
Ben Rosser wrote:
> Taken resultsdb_frontend, any chance you could look at hddfancontrol?
> ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373666).
Review done, thanks for taking on resultsdb_frontend.
Tim
pgp_1JaM5cDG2.pgp
On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:15:06 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> > We have some packages which are in need of review, anyone
> > interested in a swap?
> >
> > execdb - Execution status database for
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> We have some packages which are in need of review, anyone interested in
> a swap?
>
> execdb - Execution status database for Taskotron
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346243
>
> resultsdb_frontend -
Hi Tim,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> We have some packages which are in need of review, anyone interested in
> a swap?
>
> execdb - Execution status database for Taskotron
> * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346243
I'll take execdb. Can
We have some packages which are in need of review, anyone interested in
a swap?
execdb - Execution status database for Taskotron
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346243
resultsdb_frontend - Frontend for the ResultsDB
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346245
Hi
I need a review of picketlink-bindings, a library which provides "Common
Server Bindings for WildFly":
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1372825
Is anybody interested in a swap?
Thanks in advance
.g
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Already resolved the problem… Was an over-strict requirement for
rubygem-listen >= 3.0 < 3.1 in rubygem-jekyll-watch to compat for
Ruby-MRI 1.9.3…
Am 24.08.2016 um 19:03 schrieb Vít Ondruch:
Dne 23.8.2016 v 20:11 Björn Esser napsal(a):
Thanks you very much for the reviews! ^^
We need a
Dne 23.8.2016 v 20:11 Björn Esser napsal(a):
> Thanks you very much for the reviews! ^^
>
> We need a compat-pkg for rubygem-listen, I'm afraid… :(
Why?
Vít
>
>
> Am 23.08.2016 um 19:45 schrieb gil:
>> hi
>>
>> damm i dont know what happen!
>>
>> $ fedora-review -b 1368851 --plugins Ruby
Thanks you very much for the reviews! ^^
We need a compat-pkg for rubygem-listen, I'm afraid… :(
Am 23.08.2016 um 19:45 schrieb gil:
hi
damm i dont know what happen!
$ fedora-review -b 1368851 --plugins Ruby -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -L
/home/gil/deps
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1368851
hi
damm i dont know what happen!
$ fedora-review -b 1368851 --plugins Ruby -m fedora-rawhide-i386 -L
/home/gil/deps
INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1368851
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 1368851
INFO: --> SRPM url:
A'ighty! Took them… =)
Am 23.08.2016 um 16:37 schrieb gil:
Il 23/08/2016 16:14, Björn Esser ha scritto:
Hello folks,
I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed
change in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with.
Cheers
Björn (besser82)
hi
Il 23/08/2016 16:14, Björn Esser ha scritto:
Hello folks,
I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed change
in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with.
Cheers
Björn (besser82)
hi
take:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368844
Hello folks,
I have some rubygem-packages open for review [1] for a proposed change
in Fedora 25 [2] and looking for someone to swap reviews with.
Cheers
Björn (besser82)
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1368851_resolved=1
[2]
On 06/01/2016 09:49 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I've got a handful of packages awaiting review, and am willing to swap
> for reviews with others. Take your pick:
> - gap-pkg-gbnp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340513
Taken. Can you please review btrfs-sxbackup:
I've got a handful of packages awaiting review, and am willing to swap
for reviews with others. Take your pick:
- gap-pkg-resclasses: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336005
- gap-pkg-gbnp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340513
- gap-pkg-irredsol:
On 6 May 2016 17:24, "Jerry James" wrote:
>
> I've got another small pile of GAP packages that need reviews. These
> are all pretty simple, and follow practices established for existing
> GAP packages. Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
>
> -
I've got another small pile of GAP packages that need reviews. These
are all pretty simple, and follow practices established for existing
GAP packages. Let me know what I can review for you in exchange.
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332607: gap-pkg-scscp
-
Hi
catch
can you take this for me?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316196
thanks in advance
.g
Il 31/03/2016 23:48, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm looking for reviewers for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322993
python-cma - Covariance Matrix
Hi,
I'm looking for reviewers for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322993
python-cma - Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy numerical optimizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318873
neurord - Stochastic reaction-diffusion simulator
I'll be happy to review
Hi, Corey.
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 15:39, Corey Sheldon wrote:
> On 03/15/2016 09:19 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm looking for reviewers for a couple of new packages:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825
> Dominik,
>
>
> While I'm not a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/15/2016 09:19 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm looking for reviewers for a couple of new packages:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825
> mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests
On 03/15/2016 09:19 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm looking for reviewers for a couple of new packages:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825
Dominik,
While I'm not a packager, I am surely game for testing out some stuff
for you (partly to get myself
On Tuesday, 15 March 2016 at 14:32, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 14:19 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292040
> > tng - Trajectory Next Generation binary format manipulation library
> >
> >
>
> tng is already
On Tue, 2016-03-15 at 14:19 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292040
> tng - Trajectory Next Generation binary format manipulation library
>
>
tng is already under review.
> Regards,
> Dominik
--
---
Antonio Trande
mailto:
Hi!
I'm looking for reviewers for a couple of new packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082825
mozilla-lightbeam - An add-on for visualizing HTTP requests between
websites in real time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154750
mozilla-privacy-badger - Protects your
On 9 March 2016 at 00:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I'm looking for reviewers for:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315871
> Library for building data processing pipelines for machine learning
Have taken this one. I don't have anything for you to
I'm looking for reviewers for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315910
python-libarchive-c - Python interface to libarchive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315912
diffoscope - In-depth comparison of files, archives, and directories
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> I have three outstanding reviews that I'd like to push through so I
> can work out the next layer of my dependency tree. I'd be happy to
> swap reviews with someone. Links below:
>
> rubygem-async_sinatra
201 - 300 of 503 matches
Mail list logo