Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-13 Thread Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
I took csstidy. 04.08.2010 20:32, Bill Nottingham wrote: Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 14. The following packages are currently orphaned and

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread Benny Amorsen
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes: PA uses a more correct but more CPU-intensive resampling method than ALSA by default. On very slow systems it's a good idea to edit /etc/pulse/daemon.conf and change the 'resample-method' parameter. Back when I had a slow enough machine to care (A

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread Radek Vokál
On 08/05/2010 10:13 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: Excerpts from Chen Lei's message of Thu Aug 05 09:10:25 +0200 2010: It seems a lot of java packages will be orphaned, should we contact JAVA-SIG and maven2/eclipse/intellij-idea maintainers? Unfortunately there is no JAVA-SIG though I was

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread Bill Nottingham
Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) said: I suggest that these be just built without NAS support. NAS is basically an older competitor to PulseAudio with fewer features (it focuses on network transparency, which is just one of the things PulseAudio does), it is not compatible with

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Petr Pisar (ppi...@redhat.com) said: I suggest that these be just built without NAS support. NAS is basically an older competitor to PulseAudio with fewer features (it focuses on network transparency, which is just

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 11:21 +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote: PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old slow hardware. Last time I

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread Kevin Kofler
pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: While the XO-1 is a comparitatively relative higher HW spec (433 mhz from memory, so not massive but still double) it might be a worthwhile canditdate as there's quite a few of them around the community for testing, its not overly powerful and sees similar issues as

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-09 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: While the XO-1 is a comparitatively relative higher HW spec (433 mhz from memory, so not massive but still double) it might be a worthwhile canditdate as there's quite a few of them around

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-07 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:11:20 -0400, Matthias wrote: On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Unblocked orphan librsvg2 I've taken ownership of this now, since dropping it is not an option. If anybody else wants to maintain the package, please let me know, I'm happy to

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-06 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2010-08-05, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Petr Pisar wrote: PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX) running at 200 MHz, Fedora doesn't support that hardware anymore (the minimum

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-06 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:34:30AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: Petr Pisar wrote: PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX) running at 200 MHz, Fedora doesn't support that hardware anymore (the

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-06 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote: PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX) running at 200 MHz, it

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-06 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:21:26AM +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:46 +, Petr Pisar wrote: PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old slow hardware. Last

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-06 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:32 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: Unblocked orphan librsvg2 I've taken ownership of this now, since dropping it is not an option. If anybody else wants to maintain the package, please let me know, I'm happy to give it up to good hands. -- devel mailing list

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-05 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan: nas     gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12     gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2     speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2    

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-05 Thread Chen Lei
2010/8/5 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at: Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan: nas     gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12     gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2     speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2     speech-dispatcher requires nas-devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-05 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
On 08/04/2010 06:32 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Unblocked orphan perl-Geo-IPfree Unblocked orphan perl-libwhisker2 I can take these two. -- Marcela Mašláňová BaseOS team Brno -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-05 Thread Chen Lei
It seems a lot of java packages will be orphaned, should we contact JAVA-SIG and maven2/eclipse/intellij-idea maintainers? Regrads, Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-05 Thread Stanislav Ochotnicky
Excerpts from Chen Lei's message of Thu Aug 05 09:10:25 +0200 2010: It seems a lot of java packages will be orphaned, should we contact JAVA-SIG and maven2/eclipse/intellij-idea maintainers? Unfortunately there is no JAVA-SIG though I was thinking about starting one. There has been some effort

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-05 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2010-08-04, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan: nas gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12 gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2 speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2 speech-dispatcher

EsounD (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14)

2010-08-05 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:46:42 + (UTC), Petr wrote: I agree NAS is very old audio system, but it has history. It works (or should work) across operating systems (do not think only about Linux). In addition it supports bidirectional sound transmission (from microphone). PulseAudio is

Re: EsounD (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14)

2010-08-05 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2010-08-05, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:46:42 + (UTC), Petr wrote: I agree NAS is very old audio system, but it has history. It works (or should work) across operating systems (do not think only about Linux). In addition it supports bidirectional

Re: EsounD (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14)

2010-08-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 05.08.10 12:58, Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) wrote: On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:46:42 + (UTC), Petr wrote: I agree NAS is very old audio system, but it has history. It works (or should work) across operating systems (do not think only about Linux). In addition it supports

Re: EsounD (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14)

2010-08-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michael Schwendt wrote: Does anybody think the same about EsounD? We still include it in Fedora. We still build lots of audio packages for it. But is it still being used by anyone? PulseAudio emulates the ESounD protocol and for some legacy applications (not even all proprietary), it's the

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-05 Thread Kevin Kofler
Petr Pisar wrote: PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX) running at 200 MHz, Fedora doesn't support that hardware anymore (the minimum is i686 = Pentium Pro). Kevin Kofler -- devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-04 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:32:23 -0400, Bill wrote: Unblocked orphan librsvg2 What's going on here? More than a dozen Red Hat people with commit access, but access was denied to one other Red Hat employee. Why? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/librsvg2 | xiphmont's Info | xiphmont's

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said: Unblocked orphan librsvg2 What's going on here? The procedure used to be for various gnome-y packages in the days before provenpackager to just assign a single maintainer and a whole slew of co-maintainers, so anyone in the Desktop SIG could

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-04 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
MS == Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com writes: MS More than a dozen Red Hat people with commit access, but access MS was denied to one other Red Hat employee. Why? You'll find that for some odd reason xiphmont has commit set to Denied on several packages. I've never understood why it ended

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-04 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Hi, pycairo has *14* co-maintainers, one of them should step up and take ownership. I took gconfmm26 (required by bakery and glom), glademm24 (bakery), as usual co-maintainers are welcome. best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-04 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:00:16PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: | xiphmont's Info | xiphmont's Packages (328) | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/xiphmont How is that package count to be interpreted? It is the amount of all packages that match any of the selected

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-04 Thread Ben Boeckel
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Unblocked orphan xautolock I use this; taken. Co-maints welcome. --Ben -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: Orphan: nas gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12 gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2 speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2 speech-dispatcher requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12 I suggest that these be just