On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 03:48:28PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 11/4/20 3:41 PM, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:48 AM Petr Lautrbach <plaut...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > As none of packages which require either libsepol or libsemanage use > > > dropped > > > symbols and in order not to break build root during soname bumps I've > > > added temporary > > > subpackages with original library versions - libsepol-compat with > > > libsepol.so.1 > > > and libsemanage-compat with libsemanage.so.1. These subpackage will be > > > dropped > > > as soon as everything is rebuilt in Rawhide. > > > > For some reason I thought libXXXX-compat package > > naming was deprecated in favor of libXXXX1 package > > naming (or libXXXX_1 if the last X was a number) > > for a .1 soname example. Although as a temporary > > bypass that is going away before it is exposed in a > > release I doubt it really matters, but is my understanding > > correct about the preferred new naming conventions? > > You are correct, "compat" in package names is no longer the proper way. > > See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple >
I stand corrected. Thanks. As of now sssd and shadow-utils are already built the side-tag so they don't need it anymore. But it could still cause troubles to ELN so I'll remove -compat packages as soon as I'm sure that they are after this. Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
