On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.pro wrote:
To understand the work this has created for Debian users and
maintainers, you may want to review this bug report which has ultimately
been traced to bundled library issues:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:11:39PM -0400, Gary Gatling wrote:
I realize we have our guidelines and we're not Debian, Suse or Ubuntu...
and that's a good thing. But, if we're making exceptions for Firefox
because of it's popularity shouldn't we do the same for Chromium.
I agree with Gerald.
On 12/08/15 17:14, Matthew Miller wrote:
It's important to note that popularity is not the sole reason for
exceptions for Firefox. Overall, everyone should review the existing
discussion in the guidelines about bundling exceptions and consider how
this might fit in (possibly including revisions
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:11:39PM -0400, Gary Gatling wrote:
I realize we have our guidelines and we're not Debian, Suse or
Ubuntu...
and that's a good thing. But, if we're making exceptions for Firefox
On 11/08/15 20:25, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
...
Things have also changed over the years, and Chrome/Chromium's
popularity has continued to grow and is now packaged in Ubuntu, Debian
and Suse. Firefox has exceptions mainly because it is deemed to
popular to keep out of the distribution. I
