On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 12:31 PM Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> As an example of the sorry state of the Java SIG, pdfbox and batik were
> orphaned 2 weeks ago, but those are dependencies of fop, which is a
> dependency of publican, which is used by appstream to build documentation,
> and half of the
As an example of the sorry state of the Java SIG, pdfbox and batik were
orphaned 2 weeks ago, but those are dependencies of fop, which is a
dependency of publican, which is used by appstream to build documentation,
and half of the distribution (including the entire KF5 stack, through extra-
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 4:54 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 09:17, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:08:02 -0800, you wrote:
> >
> > >On 11/18/19 7:29 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > >> I can't speak for everyone, but at least my experience was that it
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 09:17, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:08:02 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >On 11/18/19 7:29 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> I can't speak for everyone, but at least my experience was that it was
> >> functionally impossible to discover how to package Java stuff. In a
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:08:02 -0800, you wrote:
>On 11/18/19 7:29 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> I can't speak for everyone, but at least my experience was that it was
>> functionally impossible to discover how to package Java stuff. In a
>> lifetime (and a job) ago, I was much more engaged in the Java
On 11/18/19 7:29 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 9:34 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 11/18/19 3:40 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:37:39 +0100, you wrote:
Fabio Valentini wrote:
Or is it time for a "tabula rasa" and restart the SIG?
IMHO, yes. Kick out the 1
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 9:34 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 11/18/19 3:40 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:37:39 +0100, you wrote:
> >
> >> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >>> Or is it time for a "tabula rasa" and restart the SIG?
> >>
> >> IMHO, yes. Kick out the 1 or 2 Modularity
On 11/18/19 3:40 PM, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:37:39 +0100, you wrote:
Fabio Valentini wrote:
Or is it time for a "tabula rasa" and restart the SIG?
IMHO, yes. Kick out the 1 or 2 Modularity fundamentalists that form the
current remains of the Java SIG and create a new
On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 18:40 -0500, Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:37:39 +0100, you wrote:
>
> > Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > Or is it time for a "tabula rasa" and restart the SIG?
> >
> > IMHO, yes. Kick out the 1 or 2 Modularity fundamentalists that form
> > the
> > current
- Original Message -
> From: "Gerald Henriksen"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 6:40:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [fedora-java] What's the State of the Java SIG?
>
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:37:39 +010
On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 13:37:39 +0100, you wrote:
>Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> Or is it time for a "tabula rasa" and restart the SIG?
>
>IMHO, yes. Kick out the 1 or 2 Modularity fundamentalists that form the
>current remains of the Java SIG and create a new Java SIG from scratch that
>actually
On Mon, 2019-11-18 at 13:37 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Or is it time for a "tabula rasa" and restart the SIG?
>
> IMHO, yes. Kick out the 1 or 2 Modularity fundamentalists that form
> the
> current remains of the Java SIG and create a new Java SIG from
> scratch that
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Or is it time for a "tabula rasa" and restart the SIG?
IMHO, yes. Kick out the 1 or 2 Modularity fundamentalists that form the
current remains of the Java SIG and create a new Java SIG from scratch that
actually cares about packaging Java properly in and for
13 matches
Mail list logo
