Re: Better to bundle a library or package different version than upstream?

On 5 September 2017 at 23:43, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:27 AM, James Hogarth > wrote: > > I do suggest popping a comment in the spec at the appropriate point > > explaining why for anyone that runs into it and is

Re: Better to bundle a library or package different version than upstream?

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:27 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > I do suggest popping a comment in the spec at the appropriate point > explaining why for anyone that runs into it and is confused I have a comment in the spec file in copr, perhaps I should also add a link to the

Re: Better to bundle a library or package different version than upstream?

On 5 September 2017 at 22:17, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you James, this did feel like the proper course of action. > ___ > > No worries ... special cases do come up and it's important to be responsive to upstream

Re: Better to bundle a library or package different version than upstream?

Thank you James, this did feel like the proper course of action. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Better to bundle a library or package different version than upstream?

On 5 September 2017 at 00:27, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > About ten days ago I asked a question on this list, but I guess on one > hand it was too specific, while on the other it coincided with people > travelling to Flock or being on vacation. As I

Better to bundle a library or package different version than upstream?

Dear all, About ten days ago I asked a question on this list, but I guess on one hand it was too specific, while on the other it coincided with people travelling to Flock or being on vacation. As I really want to get the package in question back in Fedora, I will ask again and I will try to be