Re: Packaging new Compiz 0.9 version

The problem is that compiz-reloaded (0.88) has several adjustments for MATE desktop, eg. gtk-theme reloading during theme switching, desktop shortcuts, special theme page in ccsm, etc. I don't want lost this for users of mate-compiz spin. For privat reasons i don't have the time in

Re: Packaging new Compiz 0.9 version

Good to know, thanks for answer. Can we package then separate compat version with 0.9 version? Still WIP build [1] but fully working. And already filed some bugs [2] upstream. [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/compiz0.9/ [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/1923481

Re: Packaging new Compiz 0.9 version

The official fedora spin requires compiz-0.88. compiz-0.88 is under active development and does perfectly match Mate-desktop. In the past gnome itself decided not to use compiz in favor of mutter. As Mate spin owner i am against to update compiz only because of gnome-flash, which was never

Packaging new Compiz 0.9 version

Hello. I'd like to package new Compiz 0.9. New version required for GNOME Flashback [1] and also have some other nice improvements like CCSM ported on GTK3. Currently Compiz 0.8 packaged in Fedora. The question is: should i send PR with update current Compiz 0.8 -> 0.9 or should i mad

orphaning compiz stack

I just orphaned whole the compiz stack. - compiz - compiz-plugins-main - compiz-plugins-extra - compiz-plugins-experimental - compiz-manager - compizconfig-python - compiz-bcop - emerald - emerald-themes - fusion-icon - ccsm - simple-ccsm I don't use those packages for myself any more

Re: Orphaning Unity bits: bamf, compiz-plugins-main, dee, libindicator

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 11/01/2012 09:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway > > wrote: > > > > On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Only one package depends on

Re: Orphaning Unity bits: bamf, compiz-plugins-main, dee, libindicator

On 11/01/2012 09:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway > wrote: > > On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So > > someone interested

Re: Orphaning Unity bits: bamf, compiz-plugins-main, dee, libindicator

- Original Message - > I currently own a few packages related to my old abortive attempt to > build Unity for Fedora. I don't have time to maintain these or any > direct interest in them - they were just Unity building blocks to me. > I'm orphaning these packag

Re: Orphaning Unity bits: bamf, compiz-plugins-main, dee, libindicator

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So > > someone interested in gwibber might want to pick up dee. > > I'll take dee, although, gwibber will never progress past

Re: Orphaning Unity bits: bamf, compiz-plugins-main, dee, libindicator

On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So > someone interested in gwibber might want to pick up dee. I'll take dee, although, gwibber will never progress past 3.6, because the upstream (Canonical) plan is to convert gwibbe

Re: Orphaning Unity bits: bamf, compiz-plugins-main, dee, libindicator

On 11/01/2012 06:06 PM, Damian Ivanov wrote: > And whoever want to install unity or these packages, can just use > GNOME:Ayatana from the open build service :) Unfortunately that replaces many important components with forked versions. If it was a pure add-on repository, that would be ok. Rahul

Re: Orphaning Unity bits: bamf, compiz-plugins-main, dee, libindicator

hese or any > direct interest in them - they were just Unity building blocks to me. > I'm orphaning these packages: > > bamf > compiz-plugins-main (for f16 only) > dee > libindicator > > Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So > someone i

Orphaning Unity bits: bamf, compiz-plugins-main, dee, libindicator

I currently own a few packages related to my old abortive attempt to build Unity for Fedora. I don't have time to maintain these or any direct interest in them - they were just Unity building blocks to me. I'm orphaning these packages: bamf compiz-plugins-main (for f16 only) dee li

Re: Compiz

On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 14:58 +0200, Rave it wrote: > Hi, > i've re-retired the compiz package. > > There are some old user acl's for rawhide. [...] > Are you really interest to keep your acl's for compiz? > Pls reply, otherwise i assume i can delete your ri

Compiz

Hi, i've re-retired the compiz package. There are some old user acl's for rawhide. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/compiz?_csrf_token=d92e6e7618be26b35f4fda2321a71f4e540a37f9 user: ajax alexl caillon caolanm davidz hadess hicham johnp jrb mbarnes mclasen rhughes rnorwo

Re: get compiz back in official repository

Adam Williamson wrote: > Well those are two reasons. The more important third reason is that > no-one wants to maintain compiz. I don't want to, and drago01 doesn't > want to any more, that's why he orphaned it. Whether it's 0.8 or 0.9, we > just don't want to

Re: get compiz back in official repository

On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 15:12 +0430, Bersam K wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > In fedora 17 we see no compiz, because of some conflicts with > boost-serialization. and of cource new compiz (0.9.x) are really > buggy! show blank screen when you use Desktop Cube and some other > real

Re: get compiz back in official repository

Actually the 0.8 tree is still the stable tree... the 0.9.x (glib mainloop) is the unstable one, and yes it is a nightmare and somehow unpredictable. It's a nice thing to see 0.8.x returning :) 2012/6/22 Bersam K : > Hi Everybody, > > In fedora 17 we see no compiz, because of some

get compiz back in official repository

Hi Everybody, In fedora 17 we see no compiz, because of some conflicts with boost-serialization. and of cource new compiz (0.9.x) are really buggy! show blank screen when you use Desktop Cube and some other really bad bugs. So i just figure out what other folks in Archlinux did about this, yes

Orphaning compiz

Hi, I have stopped using compiz a while ago and didn't really have much time to maintain it (it has a lots of open bugs) I decided that it is probably better to hand it over to someone else who has more time and actually still uses it. It has lots abrt of bugs open some of them are bugs i

Re: Compiz crashes after plugging in external monitor

On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 8:57 AM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:56 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com > wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Marko, >>> glad to see compiz working for you. In the meanwhile I found this bug >>> already

Re: Compiz crashes after plugging in external monitor

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:56 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Thanks Marko, >> glad to see compiz working for you. In the meanwhile I found this bug >> already reported: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653085 >> >> So anybody ple

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

Kevin Kofler wrote: > Björn Persson wrote: > > As an example, Kmail and Kate recently started making noises in certain > > situations, when displaying dialog boxes and the like, even though I had > > sound effects turned off. > > In that case, they were always supposed to make those event sounds,

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

On Monday, January 24, 2011 02:06:50 am Kevin Kofler wrote: > You can run "systemsettings" from a terminal or a "run command" interface. > > (I think we should reconsider the decision of having KDE's System Settings > only shown in the menu in KDE/Plasma sessions, I'll bring this up in our > KDE

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

Adam Williamson wrote: > and I would need an exception to the 'no-non-upstreamed-patches' policy to > ship those patches. That's not a policy, it's a purely indicative guideline which states very clearly that there are many reasons why patches can be needed. It's purely the maintainer/comaintain

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

tup, so they are not likely to be merged upstream, so we won't be > > carrying them in Fedora. I'm afraid you'll have to re-do your > > configuration with the 0.9 switch, if you have a custom compiz > > configuration; sorry about that. > > I think this is really unhe

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

Björn Persson wrote: > I agree with that, and it's still annoying even if it's not literally > everything that must be reconfigured. Right, but: > As an example, Kmail and Kate recently started making noises in certain > situations, when displaying dialog boxes and the like, even though I had > s

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

Kevin Kofler wrote: > It's really rude to force > users to reconfigure everything when they upgrade to a new Fedora just > because upstream couldn't be bothered to migrate settings properly (and I > hate upstreams doing that). I agree with that, and it's still annoying even if it's not literall

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

x27;m afraid you'll have to re-do your > configuration with the 0.9 switch, if you have a custom compiz > configuration; sorry about that. I think this is really unhelpful. If Ubuntu has patches to migrate configuration automatically, we should ship them. It's really rude to fo

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote: >> In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson >> wrote: >>> * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install >>> 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a &#x

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson > wrote: >> * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install >> 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' ch

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 16:02 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote: > Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work > properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to > set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the > problem. hum,

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 00:13 +, Ben Boeckel wrote: > In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson > wrote: > > * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install > > 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz'

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson wrote: > * desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install > 'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at > the login manager you can use to get a GNOME 2 + Compiz-styl

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the problem. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 04:47 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote: > Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows > emerald-0.8.4-7.fc15.x86_64.rpm That's the old, un-fixed emerald build - it must not have made it into the last compose. The fixed build is http://koji.fedoraproje

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows ccsm-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.noarch.rpm compiz-0.9.2.2-0.8.git619abc05b1.fc15.x86_64.rpm compizconfig-python-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm compiz-plugins-main-0.9.2.1-4.fc15.x86_64.rpm fusion-icon-0.1.0-0.9.5e2dc9git.fc15.noarch.rpm fusion-icon-gtk

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote: > for now I'm going to at least see if I can get a 'pure-gconf' setup to > work with ccsm. well, I think I have this going now. the question now is whether to force gconf on all compiz users...I think I'll upda

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote: > configure compiz!' was one of the most popular bug reports (see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532229 ). I can't really > think of a really good way to set this up, especially given that the > compiz

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

uration storage system for some reason. If you do, you'll have > > to > > make sure whatever method you use for launching compiz sets the > > 'gconf' > > parameter instead of 'ccp'. The compiz-gtk script which most people > > probably wind up u

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

o > make sure whatever method you use for launching compiz sets the > 'gconf' > parameter instead of 'ccp'. The compiz-gtk script which most people > probably wind up using, one way or another, to launch compiz now > specifies 'ccp' not 'gconf'.

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 17:49 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote: > I have to agree with there being too many way to launch compiz. I've > decided I like having the fusion-icon applet in the panel, so I'll wait > to see what you've been able to do with fusion-icon. Compiz-gtk w

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

I have to agree with there being too many way to launch compiz. I've decided I like having the fusion-icon applet in the panel, so I'll wait to see what you've been able to do with fusion-icon. Compiz-gtk wants to pull in 13 new packages - that's 13 too many, especially when o

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 00:34 +, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:11 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote: > > Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE? > > Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and > > modif

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 16:11 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote: > Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE? > Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and > modifying lxsession to use compiz rather than fusion icon left me > without window

Re: Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

Any advice for those of us using compiz (fusion-icon) with LXDE? Fusion-icon crashes with compiz 0.9. Moving ~/.config/compiz aside and modifying lxsession to use compiz rather than fusion icon left me without window decorations and a usable mouse -- devel mailing list devel

Compiz 0.9 landing in Rawhide

Quick note for Rawhide users: I am in the process of landing Compiz 0.9 now. Adel and I have been testing the 0.9 migration in a side repo - http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/Compiz09/compiz09/ - for a while now, and we're happy it's working pretty well. Note that we're usi