On 7/13/22 09:10, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13. 07. 22 8:58, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
Has a bug been filed against subversion (and other low-lying deps) yet?
The bugs were filled agaisnt all native direct depndencies of java(-devel) and
against all transitive depndencies of java, which are
On 13. 07. 22 8:58, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
Has a bug been filed against subversion (and other low-lying deps) yet?
(I could not see any bug and wondering why not?)
Yes and it has been fixed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103909
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC:
Has a bug been filed against subversion (and other low-lying deps) yet?
(I could not see any bug and wondering why not?)
Naively it looks like the filed bugs are more targeting higher dependent
packages which is less useful.
I think it is the immediate dependencies like subversion (and possibly
On 4/19/22 09:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This change has been reworked...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs
If folks could take a fresh look and see if this addresses their
concerns, that would be great.
kevin
It mentions dropping i686 Java in March. We're past that :) Bugs
This change has been reworked...
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs
If folks could take a fresh look and see if this addresses their
concerns, that would be great.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing
jj, right you are.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 4:43 PM Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> I interpreted this to mean that, while this Java proposal and
> Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval both have to do with i686 removals:
>
> - the Java change should not be seen as part of
> Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
> - the Java change
I interpreted this to mean that, while this Java proposal and
Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval both have to do with i686 removals:
- the Java change should not be seen as part of Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
- the Java change was written without knowledge of
Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 1:08 PM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> Small clarification. I had jsut lerned abotu
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval . This java
> proposal have nothig to do with that and was asctually done without anybody
> from JDK maintainers beeing aware.
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:31 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> You have valid points.
> The non transitive list is indeed not somehow immense[1]. Will add it to wiki
> page. Will also provide few recursive iterations. Ty for reminder.
> As for the java-arches macro, I have no objections to it.
Small clarification. I had jsut lerned abotu
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval . This java
proposal have nothig to do with that and was asctually done without anybody
from JDK maintainers beeing aware.
Still ti remains valid.
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA
Hi!
You have valid points.
The non transitive list is indeed not somehow immense[1]. Will add it to wiki
page. Will also provide few recursive iterations. Ty for reminder.
As for the java-arches macro, I have no objections to it. It is PR to
jpackages-tools? But maybe one note against - it
On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 4:01 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
(snip)
> == Scope ==
> Change owners
> * we will simiply stop building i686 pkg in rawhide
>
> Other developers
> * may notice the multilib i686 java missing.
> * it is up to them to drop i686 builds or to povide workaround
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs
== Summary ==
java-1.8.0-openjdk, java-11-openjdk, java-17-openjdk and
java-latest-openjdk packages will no longer build i686 subpackages
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:jvanek| Jiri Vanek]]
* Email:
* Product: java and java stack
* Responsible
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs
== Summary ==
java-1.8.0-openjdk, java-11-openjdk, java-17-openjdk and
java-latest-openjdk packages will no longer build i686 subpackages
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:jvanek| Jiri Vanek]]
* Email:
* Product: java and java stack
* Responsible
15 matches
Mail list logo
