FF 107.0 shipped in all current Fedora releases a while ago. You can
find all that in bodhi. If you mean 107.0.1, that will depend on the FF
maintainers. Maybe they see no reason to respin, because the bugs fixed
in that release are not something that is important in Fedora - not
sure.
--
Bojan
On 12/3/22 22:41, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> 107.0.1 build for
> F37/x86_64: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bojan/FF/
>
> If you want/need or are obsessive about version numbers, like yours
> truly. ;-)
When will FF107 actually ship in Fedora?
--
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour
107.0.1 build for
F37/x86_64: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bojan/FF/
If you want/need or are obsessive about version numbers, like yours
truly. ;-)
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Dne 22. 11. 22 v 20:41 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 12:48 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Would it be possible to develop a way to better manage updates of some
interconnected packages? FF + NSS would be one case, but when we are
doing Ruby on Rails update, it always involve more
On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 12:48 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to develop a way to better manage updates of some
> interconnected packages? FF + NSS would be one case, but when we are
> doing Ruby on Rails update, it always involve more packages. Or probably
> gcc + annobin are
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 6:48 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 21. 11. 22 v 18:56 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 12:43 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> On 11/21/22 09:23, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 19:24 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On
Dne 21. 11. 22 v 18:56 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 12:43 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 11/21/22 09:23, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 19:24 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 11/20/22 17:40, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 17:22 -0500, Demi Marie
On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 12:43 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 11/21/22 09:23, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 19:24 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > > On 11/20/22 17:40, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 17:22 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > > > > On 11/20/22
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 12:45 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 11/21/22 09:23, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 19:24 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> >> On 11/20/22 17:40, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 17:22 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 11/20/22
On 11/21/22 09:23, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 19:24 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 11/20/22 17:40, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 17:22 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
On 11/20/22 07:24, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> Now that nss 3.85 has been
On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 19:24 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 11/20/22 17:40, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 17:22 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> > > On 11/20/22 07:24, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> > > > Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building
Dne 20. 11. 22 v 13:24 Bojan Smojver via devel napsal(a):
PS. I am not the FF maintainer (obviously), so this is just for kicks.
Feel free to use Copr for such experiments
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list --
Of course, relevant build overrides had to be provided, because
required version of nss was not in stable at the time I started these
scratch builds. Thought I'd mention it for completeness.
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list --
On 20/11/2022 23:22, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
Has switching to bundled NSS been considered? For browsers anything
that holds up an update is very,*very* bad.
No. Bundling cryptographic libraries is a very, very bad idea.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 11/20/22 17:40, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 17:22 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> On 11/20/22 07:24, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
>>> Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building
>>> FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds
On Sun, 2022-11-20 at 17:22 -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> On 11/20/22 07:24, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> > Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building
> > FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds
> > failed in koji, because nss was too
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 5:23 PM Demi Marie Obenour
wrote:
>
> On 11/20/22 07:24, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> > Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building
> > FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds
> > failed in koji, because nss was too
On 11/20/22 07:24, Bojan Smojver via devel wrote:
> Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building
> FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds
> failed in koji, because nss was too old at the time.
Has switching to bundled NSS been considered? For
Everything except F38 completed fine.
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Now that nss 3.85 has been built, I thought I'd have a go at building
FF 107.0, given that's been out for a few days and original builds
failed in koji, because nss was too old at the time.
No idea how this is going to end up, but the tasks for F3{8,7,6,5} are
here, if anyone is interested:
20 matches
Mail list logo
