On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 11:46:00 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:44:19 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
I just had a quick IRC chat with DNF maintainer and he said we
still wants to switch to
- Original Message -
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:44:19 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
I just had a quick IRC chat with DNF maintainer and he said we still
wants to switch to py3 for F22.
Lovely.
Perhaps we could get the dnf folks, anaconda, qa and fesco all
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:44:19 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
I just had a quick IRC chat with DNF maintainer and he said we still
wants to switch to py3 for F22.
Lovely.
Perhaps we could get the dnf folks, anaconda, qa and fesco all together
in one place to discuss
- Original Message -
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 08:56 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
I'm regularly talking to some of Anaconda devs (mostly Vrata
Podzimek) and they still think this is doable *without* introducing
high number of regressions, that would be impossible to fix before
F22
- Original Message -
On 29 January 2015 at 07:39, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM,
- Original Message -
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:39:28 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
Not sure about it being the default, but we've been testing it in
DevAssistant for dependency installation on Python 3 and never
encountered any problems. I was also contacted
On Fri, 2015-01-30 at 04:44 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:39:28 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
So if more minimal is minimal buildroot, then we can achieve that,
since it only has python-libs because of gdb
On 29 January 2015 at 07:39, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:39:28 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
Not sure about it being the default, but we've been testing it in
DevAssistant for dependency installation on Python 3 and never
encountered any problems. I was also contacted by dnf maintainer with
a question
- Original Message -
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:09:08 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I
realized that I should probably follow the mass bug filing policy. As
I've said previously, we've already
So, at today's FESCo meeting there was a good deal of discussion about
python as default:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-28/fesco.2015-01-28-18.02.log.html#l-41
in which we agreed defer this to F23, file bugs against rawhide after
branch (+6,0,0)
I really
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 08:06:04AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
(Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will chime
in.)
- What if Anaconda does make it? :)
I don’t know.
I'm skeptical that will
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:09:08AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Some general notes:
If your package depends on Python because of a Python script that has
/usr/bin/python in hashbang, you need to change this to /usr/bin/python3.
All Requires and BuildRequires
(Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will chime in.)
- What if Anaconda does make it? :)
I don’t know.
- What is enough? It's possible that two or three packages may be still
unported even in F23 (and as for server livecd in F23, I think there will be
few more).
2-3
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
(Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will chime in.)
- What if Anaconda does make it? :)
I don’t know.
I'm skeptical that will happen. Even if it does, that alone is likely
not enough to claim
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 05:28:37AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:09:08AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Some general notes:
If your package depends on Python because of a Python script that has
/usr/bin/python in hashbang, you need
- Original Message -
So, at today's FESCo meeting there was a good deal of discussion about
python as default:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-01-28/fesco.2015-01-28-18.02.log.html#l-41
in which we agreed defer this to F23, file bugs against rawhide
- Original Message -
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
(Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will
chime
in.)
- Original Message -
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
(Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will chime
in.)
- What if Anaconda does make it? :)
I don’t know.
I'm skeptical that will happen. Even if it does, that
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:38 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote:
(Speaking only for myself, not for all of FESCo; hoping others will chime
in.)
- What if Anaconda does make it? :)
On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 08:56 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
I'm regularly talking to some of Anaconda devs (mostly Vrata
Podzimek) and they still think this is doable *without* introducing
high number of regressions, that would be impossible to fix before
F22 final.
That doesn't seem to be
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:09 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi,
I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I
realized that I should probably follow the mass bug filing policy.
As I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2 and
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:09:08 -0500 (EST)
Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I
realized that I should probably follow the mass bug filing policy. As
I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2 and Python 3 on
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:09:08AM -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Some general notes:
If your package depends on Python because of a Python script that has
/usr/bin/python in hashbang, you need to change this to /usr/bin/python3. All
Requires and BuildRequires on Python extension modules have
Hi,
I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I realized that I
should probably follow the mass bug filing policy.
As I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2 and Python 3 on
LiveCDs for few releases, so it makes sense to move as much as possible to
Python 3. My
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:09 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi,
I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I realized that
I should probably follow the mass bug filing policy.
As I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2 and Python 3 on
LiveCDs for few releases,
On 01/28/2015 06:08 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:09 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi,
I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I realized that I
should probably follow the mass bug filing policy.
As I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2
27 matches
Mail list logo
