On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 09:27:29PM +0200, Tim Jackson wrote:
> On 30/09/2019 21:02, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 14:54, Tim Jackson wrote:
>
> > > Where is the canonical source these days for establishing package
> > > (co-)ownership, in particular in relation to
On 30/09/2019 21:02, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 14:54, Tim Jackson wrote:
Where is the canonical source these days for establishing package
(co-)ownership, in particular in relation to individual branches?
branch ownership died 2-3 years ago. a replacement was
On Mon, 30 Sep 2019 at 14:54, Tim Jackson wrote:
>
> Old, irregular maintainer here; apologies if this is a stupid question.
>
> Where is the canonical source these days for establishing package
> (co-)ownership, in particular in relation to individual branches?
>
> I looked pretty much
Old, irregular maintainer here; apologies if this is a stupid question.
Where is the canonical source these days for establishing package
(co-)ownership, in particular in relation to individual branches?
I looked pretty much everywhere I could think of, including the following:
-