On 2011-10-05, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> My particular reason for asking is that I'm looking at a soname bump for
> libpng, and if repoquery is telling me the truth, there are about 1200
> packages that will need to be rebuilt.
>
Few days ago I've been asked by Marcela how should I cope with this
proble
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 10:06 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 09:39 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bod
On Oct 5, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jesse Keating writes:
>> tl;dr if you're looking for bodhi to allow on-demand creation of topic-tags
>> for isolating build efforts from rawhide, that's too expensive of an item to
>> allow a free-for-all at this time, in my opinion.
>
> Fair enoug
Jesse Keating writes:
> tl;dr if you're looking for bodhi to allow on-demand creation of topic-tags
> for isolating build efforts from rawhide, that's too expensive of an item to
> allow a free-for-all at this time, in my opinion.
Fair enough. Is there a policy or guideline on how big a change
On Oct 4, 2011, at 10:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 09:39 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bodhi interface
>>> to manage something in koji then. It'd still be h
On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 09:39 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> >
> > Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bodhi interface
> > to manage something in koji then. It'd still be handy if we could use
> > that for Rawhide so we don't b
On 2011-09-30, Honza Horak wrote:
> On 09/30/2011 11:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
>> Perl has been rebuilt _without_ GDBM in F17 as perl-5.14.1-191.fc17 and
>> it's available in build root now.
>>
>> -- Petr
>>
>
> The new gdbm-1.9.1-1 has just landed in Fedora Rawhide. Please, re-build
> your packag
On 09/30/2011 11:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Perl has been rebuilt _without_ GDBM in F17 as perl-5.14.1-191.fc17 and
> it's available in build root now.
>
> -- Petr
>
The new gdbm-1.9.1-1 has just landed in Fedora Rawhide. Please, re-build
your package(s) if depends on gdbm.
Also python and perl
On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>
>> That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will
>> disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM
>> support in those languages, please wait until new GDMB and other
>> packages (Perl,
On Sep 29, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> Ahh I'm late. Anyway, that's a side-effect of using the bodhi interface
> to manage something in koji then. It'd still be handy if we could use
> that for Rawhide so we don't break all dependent things for people who
> want to test something
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 08:49 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:32:59 +0200
> Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:29 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > On 2011-09-21, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > > >> Jan Hor
On 2011-09-29, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote:
>> On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>>
>>> That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will
>>> disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM
>>> support in those languages, please wait un
On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>
>> That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will
>> disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM
>> support in those languages, please wait until new GDMB and other
>> packages (Perl,
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:32:11 +0100
Paul Howarth wrote:
...snip...
> >
> > The first package is already in the build root.
>
> Yes, but there's still a wait until it's actually available to build
> against, though it's usually a wait of less than an hour rather than
> the next day.
This is wha
On 09/21/2011 04:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:23:52 -0600
> Jerry James wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Bruno Wolff III
>> wrote:
>>> Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages
>>> built.
>>
>> The chain-build facility is very useful. B
Dne 21.9.2011 16:52, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>>> Its strange to me. There are concerns to have Rawhide usable but at
>>> the end, if somebody wants to prevents problems using dedicated
>>> build root, it is denied by Rel-Engs, because it is probably to
>>> much work. This is disappointing.
> Every t
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
> in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
> upgrade will be performed in F17 directly.
>
> That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:23:52 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Bruno Wolff III
> wrote:
> > Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages
> > built.
>
> The chain-build facility is very useful. But when you've got a chain
> of 3 packages to buil
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages
> built.
The chain-build facility is very useful. But when you've got a chain
of 3 packages to build, and the build of the second one fails, then
you're done for the day
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:01:10 +0200
Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 13:53 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 21.9.2011 13:45, Honza Horak napsal(a):
> > > I understand that buildroot override in bodhi works for f16 and
> > > lower only, am I wrong? I wanted to create a new target to
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:32:59 +0200
Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:29 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On 2011-09-21, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > >> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new
> > >> SONA
On 2011-09-21, Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will
> disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your package needs GDBM
> support in those languages, please wait until new GDMB and other
> packages (Perl, Python and similar) get recompiled again
On 2011-09-21, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 14:01:10 +0200,
> Nils Philippsen wrote:
>>
>> It's unclear to me why this would need to be the case. Creating a build
>> root for what we perceive as Rawhide should be just the same as
>
> Chain building is allowed for rawhide t
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 14:01:10 +0200,
Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> It's unclear to me why this would need to be the case. Creating a build
> root for what we perceive as Rawhide should be just the same as
Chain building is allowed for rawhide to help get groups of packages
built.
What I have
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 13:53 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 21.9.2011 13:45, Honza Horak napsal(a):
> > I understand that buildroot override in bodhi works for f16 and lower
> > only, am I wrong? I wanted to create a new target to make it safe, but
> > after a discussion with rel-engs it appears to
Dne 21.9.2011 13:45, Honza Horak napsal(a):
> On 09/21/2011 01:14 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
>>> in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
>
On 09/21/2011 01:14 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
>> in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
>> upgrade will be performed in F17 directly.
>>
>
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:29 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2011-09-21, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> >> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
> >> in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, t
On 2011-09-21, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
>> in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
>> upgrade will be performed in F17 directly.
>>
>> That m
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 10:59 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
> in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
> upgrade will be performed in F17 directly.
>
> That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root
Jan Horak (hhorak) is going to upgrade GDBM to version with new SONAME
in F17. Because rel-engs refused to provide dedicated build root, the
upgrade will be performed in F17 directly.
That means Perl, Pyhon and other default-build-root packages will
disable support for GDBM temporarily. So if your
31 matches
Mail list logo
