Dear maintainers,
I've just updated arpack to 3.3.0 in rawhide. There are two removed
symbols compared to the latest version in rawhide (3.1.5), but none
of the consumers seem to link against them so it should be safe.

$ rpmsodiff arpack-3.1.5-2.fc23.x86_64.rpm
arpack-3.3.0-1.b0f7a60git.fc24.x86_64.rpm 
        common sonames:
libarpack.so.2  /usr/lib64/libarpack.so.2.0.0
/usr/lib64/libarpack.so.2.0.0

--- arpack-3.1.5-2.fc23/libarpack.so.2  2015-06-17 03:04:19.000000000 +0200
+++ arpack-3.3.0-1.b0f7a60git.fc24/libarpack.so.2       2015-10-19 
11:58:19.000000000 +0200
@@ -20,3 +20,2 @@
 dgetv0_        T
-dlaqrb_        T
 dmout_ T
@@ -51,3 +50,2 @@
 sgetv0_        T
-slaqrb_        T
 smout_ T

        2 symbols removed
T dlaqrb_
T slaqrb_

vim:ft=diff

Here's the list of affected packages:
$ dnf repoquery --srpm --alldeps --releasever=rawhide --whatrequires arpack
armadillo-0:5.600.2-1.fc24.src
arpack-0:3.1.5-2.fc23.src
freefem++-0:3.31-8.3.fc24.src
julia-0:0.4.0-2.fc24.src
scilab-0:6.0.0-0.2.alpha1.fc24.src
shogun-0:4.0.1-0.1.git20150808.779c3ad.fc24.src
tapkee-0:1.0-5.fc23.src

I won't be doing any rebuilds (as none seem to be necessary), but do
tell me if there are any issues with this update.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to