Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#
Hi folks,
I have found this error even during netpbm build [1].
Do we have any progress with it? I couldn't found anything related to dwz crash
in build log. (Maybe I just overlooked it).
[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6251/31036251/build.log
Regards
Josef Ridky
Associate Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
- Original Message -
| From: "Vít Ondruch"
| To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
| Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 10:07:08 AM
| Subject: Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl:
.s390x.debug.#dwz#
|
|
|
|
|
| Dne 27.7.2018 v 00:31 Mark Wielaard napsal(a):
|
|
|
| On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 21:04 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
|
|
|
| On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
|
|
|
| On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200
| Mark Wielaard wrote:
|
|
|
| On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
|
|
|
| Hello.
|
| I try build new version of perdition package.
|
| It build fine
| ( https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416 )
| on
| all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
| ( https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/b uild.log):
|
| error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
| /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.
| 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-
| 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
|
| Could someone please help me solve that problem?
| It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
| Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz
| crashed.
| But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
| find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those
| files.
| I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at
| the
| end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file
| that hints at where it is coming from.
|
| It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
| to track down what is going on.
| so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest
|
| Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels.
| Sorry, is there any progress?
| Sorry, I did sent an update, but it apparently didn't go to the list
| for some reason. See attached.
|
| Unfortunately some other things came up, so I couldn't immediately try
| to look deeper. And I managed to loose the files that helped me
| replicate the issue.
|
| Now trying to rebuild the package I suddenly get these errors:
|
| ssl.c: In function '__perdition_verify_callback':
| ssl.c:243:35: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
| 'X509_STORE_CTX' {aka 'struct x509_store_ctx_st'}
| if (__perdition_verify_result(ctx->error, cert)
| ^~
| ssl.c: In function '__perdition_ssl_check_common_name':
| ssl.c:714:42: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
| 'X509_NAME_ENTRY' {aka 'struct X509_name_entry_st'}
| if (!__perdition_ssl_compare_key(key, e->value->data,
| ^~
| make[3]: *** [Makefile:643: ssl.o] Error 1
|
| Please note that OpenSSL 1.1.1 landed in Rawhide a few days ago. That could
| explain this errors ...
|
| V.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Should I fill bug for that? Against what component?
| It really looks like a bug in dwz, so please file a bug against that.
| I think a workaround for now would be to add %undefine
| _find_debuginfo_dwz_opts to your spec. But I haven't been able to test
| because of the above error.
|
| Cheers,
|
| Mark
|
|
| ___
| devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an
| email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:
| https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines:
| https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:
|
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KORDFM5B3FXCY3RJ2MYBH5MT4YBNPJBJ/
|
|
| ___
| devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
| To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
| Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
| List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
| List Archives:
|
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MHONT5U3VWPVA324CKYBNE5TCB2RVZ43/
|
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#
Dne 27.7.2018 v 00:31 Mark Wielaard napsal(a):
> On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 21:04 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
>> On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200
>>> Mark Wielaard wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I try build new version of perdition package.
>
> It build fine
> (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416)
> on
> all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
> (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/b
> uild.log):
>
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-
> 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-
> 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-
> 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-
> 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
> /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-
> 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.
> 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-
> 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
>
> Could someone please help me solve that problem?
It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz
crashed.
But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those
files.
I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at
the
end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file
that hints at where it is coming from.
It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
to track down what is going on.
>>> so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest
>>>
>>> Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels.
>> Sorry, is there any progress?
> Sorry, I did sent an update, but it apparently didn't go to the list
> for some reason. See attached.
>
> Unfortunately some other things came up, so I couldn't immediately try
> to look deeper. And I managed to loose the files that helped me
> replicate the issue.
>
> Now trying to rebuild the package I suddenly get these errors:
>
> ssl.c: In function '__perdition_verify_callback':
> ssl.c:243:35: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> 'X509_STORE_CTX' {aka 'struct x509_store_ctx_st'}
> if (__perdition_verify_result(ctx->error, cert)
> ^~
> ssl.c: In function '__perdition_ssl_check_common_name':
> ssl.c:714:42: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
> 'X509_NAME_ENTRY' {aka 'struct X509_name_entry_st'}
> if (!__perdition_ssl_compare_key(key, e->value->data,
> ^~
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:643: ssl.o] Error 1
Please note that OpenSSL 1.1.1 landed in Rawhide a few days ago. That
could explain this errors ...
V.
>
>> Should I fill bug for that? Against what component?
> It really looks like a bug in dwz, so please file a bug against that.
> I think a workaround for now would be to add %undefine
> _find_debuginfo_dwz_opts to your spec. But I haven't been able to test
> because of the above error.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KORDFM5B3FXCY3RJ2MYBH5MT4YBNPJBJ/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MHONT5U3VWPVA324CKYBNE5TCB2RVZ43/
Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#
On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 21:04 +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200
> > Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > I try build new version of perdition package.
> > > >
> > > > It build fine
> > > > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416)
> > > > on
> > > > all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
> > > > (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/b
> > > > uild.log):
> > > >
> > > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
> > > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.
> > > > 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-
> > > > 1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
> > > >
> > > > Could someone please help me solve that problem?
> > >
> > > It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
> > > Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz
> > > crashed.
> > > But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
> > > find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those
> > > files.
> > > I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at
> > > the
> > > end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file
> > > that hints at where it is coming from.
> > >
> > > It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
> > > to track down what is going on.
> >
> > so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest
> >
> > Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels.
>
> Sorry, is there any progress?
Sorry, I did sent an update, but it apparently didn't go to the list
for some reason. See attached.
Unfortunately some other things came up, so I couldn't immediately try
to look deeper. And I managed to loose the files that helped me
replicate the issue.
Now trying to rebuild the package I suddenly get these errors:
ssl.c: In function '__perdition_verify_callback':
ssl.c:243:35: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
'X509_STORE_CTX' {aka 'struct x509_store_ctx_st'}
if (__perdition_verify_result(ctx->error, cert)
^~
ssl.c: In function '__perdition_ssl_check_common_name':
ssl.c:714:42: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
'X509_NAME_ENTRY' {aka 'struct X509_name_entry_st'}
if (!__perdition_ssl_compare_key(key, e->value->data,
^~
make[3]: *** [Makefile:643: ssl.o] Error 1
> Should I fill bug for that? Against what component?
It really looks like a bug in dwz, so please file a bug against that.
I think a workaround for now would be to add %undefine
_find_debuginfo_dwz_opts to your spec. But I haven't been able to test
because of the above error.
Cheers,
Mark--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:14AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200
> Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> > > all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got
> > > (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log):
> > >
> > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.
> > > 2Sm2W5
> > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo
> > >
> > > Could someone please help me solve that problem?
> >
> > It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind.
> > Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz crashed.
> > But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the
> > find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those files.
> > I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at the
> > end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file
> > that hints at where it is coming from.
> >
> > It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine
> > to track down what is going on.
>
> so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest
>
> Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels.
Thanks. I have replicated it. But don't understand
Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#
Hello On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200 Mark Wielaard wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hello. I try build new version of perdition package. It build fine (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) on all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log): error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#. 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo Could someone please help me solve that problem? It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind. Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz crashed. But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those files. I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at the end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file that hints at where it is coming from. It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine to track down what is going on. so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels. Sorry, but is there some test machine with s390x or armv7vhl and rawhide? I cant find such on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers and that issue cannot be reproduced in stable Fedora releases. Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6B6PWZKSTDG7KBUONPKFSGCLGUIO5FFF/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4WJVQ75OC66XZTVP4IXXWYD3RGJWVH5V/
Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#
On 07/23/2018 12:36 PM, Dan Horák wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200 Mark Wielaard wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hello. I try build new version of perdition package. It build fine (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) on all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log): error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#. 2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo Could someone please help me solve that problem? It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind. Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz crashed. But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those files. I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at the end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file that hints at where it is coming from. It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine to track down what is going on. so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels. Sorry, is there any progress? Should I fill bug for that? Against what component? Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6B6PWZKSTDG7KBUONPKFSGCLGUIO5FFF/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JPMBBW2D3AP7CANHVF3BGMNLKHZXJHXI/
Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:43:43 +0200 Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I try build new version of perdition package. > > > > It build fine > > (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) on > > all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got > > (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log): > > > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#. > > 2Sm2W5 > > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo > > > > Could someone please help me solve that problem? > > It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind. > Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz crashed. > But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the > find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those files. > I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at the > end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file > that hints at where it is coming from. > > It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine > to track down what is going on. so I can reproduce that locally on my rawhide s390x guest Mark, I'll give you the machine info thru other channels. Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6B6PWZKSTDG7KBUONPKFSGCLGUIO5FFF/
Re: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:52:38PM +0300, Pavel Alexeev wrote: > Hello. > > I try build new version of perdition package. > > It build fine (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) > on all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got > (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log): > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.2Sm2W5 > /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo > > Could someone please help me solve that problem? It looks like dwz crashed and left those temporary files behind. Strangely there are no indication in the log files that dwz crashed. But there is an rm -f statement in the log right before the find-debuginfo.sh/dwz invocation that does seem to touch those files. I cannot explain where that comes from. It must be somewhere at the end of the %install phase, but there is nothing in the .spec file that hints at where it is coming from. It might be necessary to run on a real s390x or armv7vhl machine to track down what is going on. Cheers, Mark ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EPPEPSVKREOK6IUZNGXRKAU523API6KE/
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found on s390x and armv7hl: .s390x.debug.#dwz#
Hello. I try build new version of perdition package. It build fine (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28526416) on all architectures except armv7hl and s390x. On that I got (https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6424/28526424/build.log): error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.sWwnyG /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imap4s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.eE9BPY /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.imaps-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.WRTN7g /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.managesieve-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.GWCloz /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.2Sm2W5 /usr/lib/debug/usr/sbin/perdition.pop3s-2.2-1.fc29.s390x.debug.#dwz#.kvArfo Could someone please help me solve that problem? -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev. Yes, I'm a fool - I believe in people, honesty, justice as open source. And also in the fact that I can make this world just a little better unless stop fighting. http://hubbitus.info ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PB6DOPJSPJLDNUVZ3HUSNLMBORWLCXJK/
