Re: Meeting minutes for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-03-03)
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 18:24 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Did anyone forward the playground repo proposal on to FESCo? I guess not yet. Marcela put out an activity report for the Env-and-stacks WG yesterday (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1221#comment:28), which mentions the Playground repository draft. Is that enough? Tadej -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Meeting minutes for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-03-03)
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-03-04) Meeting started by mmaslano_ at 13:00:45 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-03-04/env-and-stacks.2014-03-04-13.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * init process (mmaslano_, 13:01:01) * additional repository - Playground requirements (mmaslano, 13:03:05) * how do updates work (rolling? bodhi? Will we constantly be regenerating the repodata [like the rawhide build repo?]) (mmaslano, 13:07:16) * rolling + constantly regenerating repodata (mmaslano, 13:10:26) * one repo per Fedora release + arch (tjanez, 13:11:14) * daily push (mmaslano, 13:12:25) * no bodhi yet (mmaslano, 13:14:02) * Do we trust this person to keep the repo up to date and address serious bugs/security issues. (mmaslano, 13:20:50) * we could always have the fedora-playground-release package Obsoletes: badapp-$version (mmaslano, 13:29:09) * is there a testing repo? (mmaslano, 13:42:12) * testing repo - not needed, testing are coprs (mmaslano, 13:43:07) * The repo will attempt to do automatic package review, falling back to human intervention on known trouble cases such as Obsoletes. (tjanez, 14:02:13) * ACTION: tjanez will add comments from our today's meeting to Open Questions (mmaslano, 14:09:55) Meeting ended at 14:16:56 UTC. Action Items * tjanez will add comments from our today's meeting to Open Questions Action Items, by person --- * tjanez * tjanez will add comments from our today's meeting to Open Questions * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * sgallagh (99) * mmaslano (72) * juhp (47) * tjanez (44) * hhorak (21) * sochotni (11) * bkabrda1 (10) * pingou (9) * zodbot (6) * mmaslano_ (4) * pkovar (2) * rwmjones (1) * bkabrda (0) * samkottler (0) * abadger1999 (0) * drieden (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Meeting minutes for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-03-03)
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 03:23:28PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: * additional repository - Playground requirements (mmaslano, 13:03:05) * how do updates work (rolling? bodhi? Will we constantly be regenerating the repodata [like the rawhide build repo?]) (mmaslano, 13:07:16) * rolling + constantly regenerating repodata (mmaslano, 13:10:26) * one repo per Fedora release + arch (tjanez, 13:11:14) * daily push (mmaslano, 13:12:25) * no bodhi yet (mmaslano, 13:14:02) * Do we trust this person to keep the repo up to date and address serious bugs/security issues. (mmaslano, 13:20:50) * we could always have the fedora-playground-release package Obsoletes: badapp-$version (mmaslano, 13:29:09) * is there a testing repo? (mmaslano, 13:42:12) * testing repo - not needed, testing are coprs (mmaslano, 13:43:07) * The repo will attempt to do automatic package review, falling back to human intervention on known trouble cases such as Obsoletes. (tjanez, 14:02:13) * ACTION: tjanez will add comments from our today's meeting to Open Questions (mmaslano, 14:09:55) Did anyone forward the playground repo proposal on to FESCo? FESCo needs to know about things we are hooping to do in time for tomorrow's meeting (officially, Monday, Mar 3... but discussion will start at the meeting tomorrow). -Toshio pgp39Mqzgzb5W.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
