On 1/14/19 12:04 PM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:11 AM Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm definitely interested to help (I have 6+ years experience as a packager)!
>>
>> Can we have a topic on discussion.fp.o? I think it is much easier to discuss
>> such things there.
>
>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 07:47:26PM -, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> my-fas-acco...@my-domain.org'" in my .bashrc, because looking up how to solve
> the "koji says
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 3:19 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:37 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >
> > On 1/11/19 9:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach as currently used in
> > > Copr?
> >
> > I'd rather have a licensing
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 12:37 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> On 1/11/19 9:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach as currently used in Copr?
>
> I'd rather have a licensing sign-off step. Allow fedora-review to automate
> the spec
> review and build
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:11 AM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> I'm definitely interested to help (I have 6+ years experience as a packager)!
>
> Can we have a topic on discussion.fp.o? I think it is much easier to discuss
> such things there.
Thanks! Also thanks to everyone who's expressed interest
On 1/11/19 9:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach as currently used in Copr?
I'd rather have a licensing sign-off step. Allow fedora-review to automate the spec
review and build test, but break out the licensing check. Maybe in the future we can
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 11:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 10:19, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:42:05PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > * non free submissions. What if someone submits non free content and we
>> > build and host it? That would
On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 10:19, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:42:05PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * non free submissions. What if someone submits non free content and we
> > build and host it? That would not be great.
>
> Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach as
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 10:19 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:42:05PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > * non free submissions. What if someone submits non free content and we
> > build and host it? That would not be great.
>
> Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 02:42:05PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * non free submissions. What if someone submits non free content and we
> build and host it? That would not be great.
Can we apply the same "flag and remove" approach as currently used in Copr?
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:59 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
> things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
>
> I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
> have arisen from
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 01:58:17PM -0500, Ben Rosser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
> things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
>
> I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
> have
Neal Gompa wrote:
> GOA has the ability to store kerberos logins and initialize them as
> part of your login session, too.
Every time I log in locally on my workstation? That's not good. I
suppose that's suitable in a centralized corporate or university
network, but as an infrequent Fedora
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:52 AM Björn Persson wrote:
>
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 10. 01. 19 v 20:47 Artur Iwicki napsal(a):
> > > - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> > > fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> > >
I'm definitely interested to help (I have 6+ years experience as a
packager)!
Can we have a topic on discussion.fp.o? I think it is much easier to
discuss such things there.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019, 20:07 Ben Rosser Hello,
>
> We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
>
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 10. 01. 19 v 20:47 Artur Iwicki napsal(a):
> > - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> > fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> > my-fas-acco...@my-domain.org'" in my .bashrc, because looking up how to
> > solve the
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:29 AM Artur Iwicki wrote:
>
> Just checked myself, I don't have the file either, and I use a separate local
> account for RPM packaging (that uses a different name than my FAS login). No
> idea what that's about, I can't recall any tool ever complaining about the
>
Just checked myself, I don't have the file either, and I use a separate local
account for RPM packaging (that uses a different name than my FAS login). No
idea what that's about, I can't recall any tool ever complaining about the file
missing.
___
Goog small update, thx. I moved the hint into the "Kerberos" admon and
now it is almost perfect IMO ;)
Just noticed the note about ~/.fedora.upn file, what is it about? I
don't have such file on my system, therefore I assume I don't need it,
because my FAS name is the same as my system user
That's good to know!
I have updated
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers to
reflect this.
Thanks Vit.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:09 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 10. 01. 19 v 20:47 Artur Iwicki napsal(a):
> > - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add
Dne 10. 01. 19 v 20:47 Artur Iwicki napsal(a):
> - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> my-fas-acco...@my-domain.org'" in my .bashrc, because looking up how to solve
> the "koji says I'm
On 1/10/19 11:47 AM, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> Thanks for bringing some attention to this, Ben. I don't do a whole lot of
> packaging, but I admit there are some places where the workflow could be
> improved. I'd be willing to join the group and help where I can.
>
> Some notes off the top of my
On 1/10/19 10:58 AM, Ben Rosser wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
> things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
>
> I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
> have arisen from the
> - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg
> fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit
> my-fas-acco...@my-domain.org'" in my .bashrc, because looking up how to solve
> the "koji says I'm unauthenticated" error got boring after the third time.
Mine
Thanks for bringing some attention to this, Ben. I don't do a whole lot of
packaging, but I admit there are some places where the workflow could be
improved. I'd be willing to join the group and help where I can.
Some notes off the top of my head that I ran into recently:
- fedpkg hides quite
Hello,
We had a recent discussion on this list last month about (among other
things) the current state of Pagure as a replacement for pkgdb [1].
I mentioned in that discussion that there are various issues which
have arisen from the deprecation of pkgdb that have made the packager
workflow ever
26 matches
Mail list logo
