I was going through the package review and I noticed this request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730815. I was going to do a small
review of it and noticed that the upstream version was released on 09-20-2005.
I know in my opinion, and if it was me, I wouldn't submit a package that
NO == Nathan Owe ndowen...@gmail.com writes:
NO Should I let the submitter know that it is this old or should it be
NO closed or the age of the upstream source ignored, in which I am
NO guessing the later is not the case.
Well, I could certainly ask the submitter if they're aware that the code
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:34:37 -0500
Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.edu wrote:
NO == Nathan Owe ndowen...@gmail.com writes:
NO Should I let the submitter know that it is this old or should it
NO be closed or the age of the upstream source ignored, in which I am
NO guessing the later is
NO == Nathan Owe ndowen...@gmail.com writes:
NO Yep old code does tend to work, but also this also means that
NO security or runtime bugs that are around won't be fixed either,
NO atleast upstream.
Right, which is why I wrote that you should ask the submitter if they
are willing to take on the
