Re: Provenpackager help needed to complete libpng/libtiff transition
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent > mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete > versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches to fix them, > but don't have permissions to do it myself. If any provenpackagers > have a bit of time to spare, could I pester you to look at these bugs? > > Pixie 843294 > dcmtk 819236 > fuse-emulator 843645 > grace 843647 > gshutdown 843648 > luakit 843652 > pngnq 843655 > tucnak2 843658 These are done. -J > Thanks! > > regards, tom lane > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Provenpackager help needed to complete libpng/libtiff transition
Adam Williamson writes: > On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 01:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent >> mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete >> versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches to fix them, >> but don't have permissions to do it myself. If any provenpackagers >> have a bit of time to spare, could I pester you to look at these bugs? > Thanks for doing the patches! Have you tried to upstream them, or are > the upstreams for these dead? I have not; I supposed that the respective package maintainers would be in a better position than me to pester their upstreams. These bugs are the ones that I've not gotten a response on from the maintainer, so perhaps the correct question to be asking is whether the Fedora maintainer is asleep at the wheel ... regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Provenpackager help needed to complete libpng/libtiff transition
On Wed, 2012-08-01 at 01:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent > mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete > versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches to fix them, > but don't have permissions to do it myself. If any provenpackagers > have a bit of time to spare, could I pester you to look at these bugs? > > Pixie 843294 > dcmtk 819236 > fuse-emulator 843645 > grace 843647 > gshutdown 843648 > luakit843652 > pngnq 843655 > tucnak2 843658 I'll take care of some of these tomorrow, if no-one else beats me to it. Thanks for doing the patches! Have you tried to upstream them, or are the upstreams for these dead? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Provenpackager help needed to complete libpng/libtiff transition
There are still about half a dozen packages left that failed the recent mass rebuild because they contain source-code dependencies on obsolete versions of libpng and/or libtiff. I've filed patches to fix them, but don't have permissions to do it myself. If any provenpackagers have a bit of time to spare, could I pester you to look at these bugs? Pixie 843294 dcmtk 819236 fuse-emulator 843645 grace 843647 gshutdown 843648 luakit 843652 pngnq 843655 tucnak2 843658 Thanks! regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
