On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 1:19 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 20:03 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> > So, it seems it didn't come to my mind that builders might not have new
> > enough rpm to use rpm.open() which is available since rpm 4.17.0.
> >
> > A fix for it (
> > http
On Tue, 2021-12-28 at 20:03 +0100, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> So, it seems it didn't come to my mind that builders might not have new
> enough rpm to use rpm.open() which is available since rpm 4.17.0.
>
> A fix for it (
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/authselect/pull-request/15# ) has been
So, it seems it didn't come to my mind that builders might not have new
enough rpm to use rpm.open() which is available since rpm 4.17.0.
A fix for it (
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/authselect/pull-request/15# ) has been
merged, old authselect untagged, the new build of authselect should
hop
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 5:58 PM Ian McInerney via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> That is a different error during the transaction. The original warning I
> mentioned is in dbus-broker, and is only a warning (the RPM transaction
> continues with no error). The other two you have ar
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 10:56 AM Ian McInerney wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:47 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 9:29 AM Ian McInerney via devel
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:19 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kevin
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:47 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 9:29 AM Ian McInerney via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:19 PM Justin Forbes
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:34:52AM -
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 9:29 AM Ian McInerney via devel
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:19 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:34:52AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
>> > > What exactly is wrong?
>> > >
>>
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 3:19 PM Justin Forbes wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:34:52AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > > What exactly is wrong?
> > >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?state=3&order=-build_id
> >
>
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 3:36 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:34:52AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> > What exactly is wrong?
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?state=3&order=-build_id
>
> Well, thats the list of all failed builds in koji. There's various
>
> On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:34:52AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
>
> Well, thats the list of all failed builds in koji. There's various
> different reasons for each of them to have failed...
>
> For example, the kf* ones at the top right now are due to a missing
> kaccounts-integration-deve
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:34:52AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote:
> What exactly is wrong?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?state=3&order=-build_id
Well, thats the list of all failed builds in koji. There's various
different reasons for each of them to have failed...
For example
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/
This link works
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 6:35 AM Reon Beon via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> What exactly is wrong?
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?state=3&order=-build_id
> __
What exactly is wrong?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?state=3&order=-build_id
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fe
13 matches
Mail list logo
