Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-21 Thread David Shaw
On Jul 14, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:42 +0200, Karel Klic wrote: On 07/13/2010 06:03 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: This is why I'm so surprised to see gpg be deprecated in f13. Upstream is supporting both and the manpage even indicates that the binary should be

Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-21 Thread Brian C. Lane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/21/2010 07:44 AM, David Shaw wrote: On Jul 14, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:42 +0200, Karel Klic wrote: On 07/13/2010 06:03 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: This is why I'm so surprised to see gpg be deprecated in

Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-21 Thread David Shaw
On Jul 21, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote: I am not interested in co-maintaining gnupg-1. However I do not oppose to revive it in koji. Forgive my ignorance of the process, but how can I help this happen? Aside from my own problems with the change, there are other reports of

Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-21 Thread Brian C. Lane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/21/2010 11:32 AM, David Shaw wrote: On Jul 21, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote: I am not interested in co-maintaining gnupg-1. However I do not oppose to revive it in koji. Forgive my ignorance of the process, but how can I help

Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-14 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:42 +0200, Karel Klic wrote: On 07/13/2010 06:03 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: This is why I'm so surprised to see gpg be deprecated in f13. Upstream is supporting both and the manpage even indicates that the binary should be gpg2. I don't see any reason for it to

Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-13 Thread Karel Klic
Hi, several users of Emacs and one user of Vim complained in rhbz#574406 [1] that they can no longer use their editor to open and edit gpg-encrypted files in Fedora 13. The reason is that GnuPG 1.4 was deprecated after Fedora 12 release, and GnuPG 2 was introduced to replace it. However, GnuPG

Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-13 Thread Andrew Haley
On 07/13/2010 09:54 AM, Karel Klic wrote: Hi, several users of Emacs and one user of Vim complained in rhbz#574406 [1] that they can no longer use their editor to open and edit gpg-encrypted files in Fedora 13. The reason is that GnuPG 1.4 was deprecated after Fedora 12 release, and

Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 10:54 +0200, Karel Klic wrote: Hi, several users of Emacs and one user of Vim complained in rhbz#574406 [1] that they can no longer use their editor to open and edit gpg-encrypted files in Fedora 13. The reason is that GnuPG 1.4 was deprecated after Fedora 12

Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-13 Thread Chen Lei
2010/7/13 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com: On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:57:38AM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: On 07/13/2010 09:54 AM, Karel Klic wrote: Hi, several users of Emacs and one user of Vim complained in rhbz#574406 [1] that they can no longer use their editor to open and edit

Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-13 Thread Brian C. Lane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/13/2010 05:38 AM, David Shaw wrote: On 07/13/2010 09:54 AM, Karel Klic wrote: several users of Emacs and one user of Vim complained in rhbz#574406 [1] that they can no longer use their editor to open and edit gpg-encrypted files in Fedora

Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-13 Thread Chen Lei
2010/7/14 Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/13/2010 05:38 AM, David Shaw wrote: On 07/13/2010 09:54 AM, Karel Klic wrote: several users of Emacs and one user of Vim complained in rhbz#574406 [1] that they can no longer use their editor to

Re: Should GnuPG 1.4.x be revived?

2010-07-13 Thread Karel Klic
On 07/13/2010 05:52 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Having gpg1 and gpg2 seems reasonable to me. Note, though, that the problem is slightly more limited in scope. At least with vim, if you have an X display, gpg2 will invoke the graphical pinentry where you can enter your passphrase and go about