Re: incorrect docs for forge macro extension, when using 'unknown' scm source (e.g., git.kernel.org) ?

2020-07-10 Thread PGNet Dev
On 7/10/20 1:26 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le jeudi 09 juillet 2020 à 09:40 -0700, PGNet Dev a écrit : I'm working on a spec, pulling source with forgemeta/scm With known/supported scm sources (e.g., github), it works as expected, with no issues. involves writing the lua equivalent of regexpe

Re: incorrect docs for forge macro extension, when using 'unknown' scm source (e.g., git.kernel.org) ?

2020-07-10 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le jeudi 09 juillet 2020 à 09:40 -0700, PGNet Dev a écrit : > I'm working on a spec, pulling source with forgemeta/scm > > With known/supported scm sources (e.g., github), it works as > expected, with no issues. Because every forge hosting service out there is inventing its own archive export API

incorrect docs for forge macro extension, when using 'unknown' scm source (e.g., git.kernel.org) ?

2020-07-09 Thread PGNet Dev
I'm working on a spec, pulling source with forgemeta/scm With known/supported scm sources (e.g., github), it works as expected, with no issues. Atm, I'm trying to pull from a different source, git.kernel.org with this 'ofono-test.spec'