Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-09-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 05:01:57PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > I just edited the f38 tag at Mon Aug 22 08:29:51 PM UTC 2022 to switch > > to nspawn. > > > > If you have detected a issue that seems like it might be related to this > > change, please file a releng ticket

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-09-13 Thread Florian Weimer
* Kevin Fenzi: > I just edited the f38 tag at Mon Aug 22 08:29:51 PM UTC 2022 to switch > to nspawn. > > If you have detected a issue that seems like it might be related to this > change, please file a releng ticket and we will dig into it. Thanks, the glibc (nested) container tests started

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
I just edited the f38 tag at Mon Aug 22 08:29:51 PM UTC 2022 to switch to nspawn. If you have detected a issue that seems like it might be related to this change, please file a releng ticket and we will dig into it. Thanks, kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-20 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 11:18:14PM -0400, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 09:46 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > Since everyone seems postivie on this, I'll look at switching it on > > monday and see what breaks. > > Does this apply just to package builds, or to everything? i.e.

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-20 Thread Robby Callicotte via devel
loop devices) > have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide > to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up. > > If everyone is ok with it, I can enable it (just for rawhide) and we can > look for issues with composes or any other items. At least

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-20 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2022-08-19 at 09:46 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Since everyone seems postivie on this, I'll look at switching it on > monday and see what breaks. Does this apply just to package builds, or to everything? i.e. are live image builds also going to use it? It's not necessarily a problem

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
sing > > > chroot isolation. > > > > > > Releng has had a ticket open for a long time to switch > > > ( https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6967 ) > > > > > > I think the two items listed there (kernel bind mounts and loop devices)

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-19 Thread Miro Hrončok
rawhide to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up. If everyone is ok with it, I can enable it (just for rawhide) and we can look for issues with composes or any other items. At least then we would have a good list of things we would like to fix. If it turns out things just work ok we can

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-19 Thread Florian Weimer
( https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6967 ) > > > > I think the two items listed there (kernel bind mounts and loop devices) > > have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide > > to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up. > > What's t

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-19 Thread Stephen Smoogen
> > > I think the two items listed there (kernel bind mounts and loop devices) > > have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide > > to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up. > > What's the version of nspawn that will be used here? Pr

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-19 Thread Florian Weimer
d, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide > to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up. What's the version of nspawn that will be used here? Presumably it's not the rawhide version, but the host version? Thanks, Florian ___ devel mai

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-18 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 14:01 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Thoughts? ♥ nspawn ♥ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-18 Thread Jonathan Wright via devel
evices) > have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide > to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up. > > If everyone is ok with it, I can enable it (just for rawhide) and we can > look for issues with composes or any other items. At least then

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-18 Thread Kalev Lember
) > have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide > to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up. > > If everyone is ok with it, I can enable it (just for rawhide) and we can > look for issues with composes or any other items. At least then we woul

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-18 Thread Neal Gompa
d there (kernel bind mounts and loop devices) > have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide > to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up. > > If everyone is ok with it, I can enable it (just for rawhide) and we can > look for issues with compose

nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
to using chroot isolation. Releng has had a ticket open for a long time to switch ( https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6967 ) I think the two items listed there (kernel bind mounts and loop devices) have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide to using nspawn and see if any