Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 06/06/2012 04:25 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote: We will split out a systemd-libs subpackage to be more multilib-friendly. Done in systemd-185-4.gita2368a3.fc18. Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
I think we can also take this to mean that an explicit:
Requires: udev
is now redundant? In which case the following (F17) packages can be cleaned
up:
% repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora --qf=%{sourcerpm}
--whatrequires udev | sort -u
snip
iwl1000-firmware-39.31.5.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl100-firmware-39.31.5.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl5150-firmware-8.24.2.2-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000-firmware-9.221.4.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000g2b-firmware-17.168.5.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6050-firmware-41.28.5.1-4.fc17.src.rpm
Those are actually going to be retired as soon as linville gets around
to it. They've been sucked into linux-firmware.
linux-firmware-20120206-0.3.git06c8f81.fc17.src.rpm
Fixed.
josh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 06/05/2012 04:33 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote: On 06/05/2012 03:52 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: Systemd includes libudev.so.1, while the old libudev.rpm provided libudev.so.0. Therefore, all packages using udev need to be rebuilt. Here's a list of owners with packages that currently require libudev.so.0 in Rawhide. twaugh system-config-printer fixed -- Jiri -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 01:12 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: #yum update mesa-libgbm [...] --- Package mesa-libgbm.i686 0:8.1-0.5.fc18 will be updated --- Package mesa-libgbm.x86_64 0:8.1-0.5.fc18 will be updated --- Package mesa-libgbm.i686 0:8.1-0.6.fc18 will be an update -- Processing Dependency: libudev.so.1(LIBUDEV_183) for package: mesa-libgbm-8.1-0.6.fc18.i686 -- Processing Dependency: libudev.so.1 for package: mesa-libgbm-8.1-0.6.fc18.i686 --- Package mesa-libgbm.x86_64 0:8.1-0.6.fc18 will be an update -- Running transaction check --- Package systemd.i686 0:185-2.fc18 will be installed After having had some funny issues in the past due to there being two systemds (x86_64, i686) installed for some reason, something tells me that it's a bad idea to proceed with the update. Or am I wrong? Having two systemd packages installed isn't necessarily a problem, rpm's color concept on ELF objects should mean that x86_64 should win wherever the two packages' files collide, which should only be in /usr/*bin. It's still not the prettiest thing in the world, I admit; I'd be happier if there were a systemd-libs even if it were effectively not optional. But if there's not going to be a systemd-libs subpackage, any issues you do have with this scenario are systemd bugs. - ajax signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 06/06/2012 03:26 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
But if there's not going to be a systemd-libs subpackage, any issues you
do have with this scenario are systemd bugs.
We discussed it recently with Kay. We will split out a systemd-libs
subpackage to be more multilib-friendly. That said, we are not aware of
any specific issues with having both systemd.{x86_64,i686} installed.
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
We discussed it recently with Kay. We will split out a systemd-libs
subpackage to be more multilib-friendly. That said, we are not aware of any
specific issues with having both systemd.{x86_64,i686} installed.
Just to elaborate: The issues I was referring to happened during a
F16-rawhide upgrade last December, when mistakenly doing yum upgrade
instead of distro-sync. I don't recall the specific symptoms, and didn't
investigate further since they went away with a yum erase --remove-leaves
systemd.i686. However, they might also have been caused by one of systemd's
dependencies.
Anyway, thanks for the clarifications.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 06/05/2012 09:30 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 6/4/12 9:52 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
We merged the upstream udev repository entirely into the systemd
repository. There is no standalone upstream udev project anymore.
The version of systemd which includes udev has landed in rawhide a
couple of days ago. Fedora 18 will not have a udev.rpm, no libudev.rpm
and no libudev-devel.rpm.
I think we can also take this to mean that an explicit:
Requires: udev
is now redundant? In which case the following (F17) packages can be
cleaned up:
I presume that I can remove the requires from packages in the list
below, and that no changes to parts such as
%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/udev/rules.d/*
are required?
Come to think of it... shouldn't the rules that come with a package be
in /lib/udev/rules.d?
% repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora --qf=%{sourcerpm}
--whatrequires udev | sort -u
aic94xx-firmware-30-3.fc17.src.rpm
alsa-firmware-1.0.25-1.fc17.src.rpm
alsa-tools-1.0.25-2.fc17.src.rpm
android-tools-20111220git1b251bd-2.fc17.src.rpm
ar9170-firmware-2009.05.28-4.fc17.src.rpm
argyllcms-1.3.6-2.fc17.src.rpm
b43-openfwwf-5.2-7.fc17.src.rpm
barry-0.17.1-7.fc17.src.rpm
bfa-firmware-3.0.0.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
biosdevname-0.3.11-6.fc17.src.rpm
bluez-4.98-3.fc17.src.rpm
btkbdd-1.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
clamtk-4.39-1.fc17.src.rpm
crda-1.1.2_2011.04.28-2.fc17.src.rpm
cups-1.5.2-12.fc17.src.rpm
device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-25.fc17.src.rpm
dracut-018-35.git20120510.fc17.src.rpm
drbd-8.3.11-5.fc17.src.rpm
em8300-0.18.0-6.fc17.src.rpm
fbterm-1.6-5.fc17.src.rpm
fxload-2002_04_11-11.fc17.src.rpm
gpsd-3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm
hplip-3.12.4-2.fc17.src.rpm
i2c-tools-3.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
initscripts-9.37-1.fc17.src.rpm
iscan-firmware-2.26.4-2.fc17.src.rpm
isdn4k-utils-3.2-81.fc17.src.rpm
isight-firmware-tools-1.6-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl1000-firmware-39.31.5.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl100-firmware-39.31.5.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl5150-firmware-8.24.2.2-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000-firmware-9.221.4.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000g2b-firmware-17.168.5.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6050-firmware-41.28.5.1-4.fc17.src.rpm
libconcord-0.23-9.fc17.src.rpm
libdrm-2.4.33-1.fc17.src.rpm
libertas-sd8686-firmware-9.70.20.p0-2.fc17.src.rpm
libftdi-0.19-3.fc17.src.rpm
libgpod-0.8.2-4.fc17.src.rpm
libguestfs-1.17.36-2.fc17.src.rpm
libmtp-1.1.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
libnjb-2.2.7-2.fc17.src.rpm
libosinfo-0.1.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
libphidget-2.1.8.20120123-1.fc17.src.rpm
libvirt-0.9.11.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
linux-firmware-20120206-0.3.git06c8f81.fc17.src.rpm
lvm2-2.02.95-6.fc17.src.rpm
MAKEDEV-3.24-10.fc17.src.rpm
mdadm-3.2.3-6.fc17.src.rpm
media-player-info-16-1.fc17.src.rpm
microcode_ctl-1.17-24.fc17.src.rpm
NetworkManager-0.9.4.0-7.git20120403.fc17.src.rpm
netxen-firmware-4.0.534-5.fc17.src.rpm
nut-2.6.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
olpc-utils-2.0.7-1.fc17.src.rpm
openct-0.6.20-3.fc17.src.rpm
openni-primesense-5.0.3.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
os-prober-1.53-1.fc17.src.rpm
ovirt-node-2.3.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
pcmciautils-018-2.fc17.src.rpm
pulseaudio-1.1-9.fc17.src.rpm
rdma-1.0-11.fc17.src.rpm
sane-backends-1.0.22-9.fc17.src.rpm
svxlink-11.11.1-4.fc17.src.rpm
synce-sync-engine-0.15.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
systemd-44-8.fc17.src.rpm
udev-182-1.fc17.src.rpm
udisks-1.0.4-6.fc17.src.rpm
udisks2-1.94.0-4.fc17.src.rpm
upower-0.9.16-1.fc17.src.rpm
usb_modeswitch-data-20111023-2.fc17.src.rpm
util-linux-2.21.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
v4l-utils-0.8.7-1.fc17.src.rpm
vdr-1.7.27-1.fc17.src.rpm
vdr-remote-0.4.0-19.fc17.src.rpm
xen-4.1.2-15.fc17.src.rpm
xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.6.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-12.8.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.14.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
- ajax
--
Nathanael d. Noblet
t 403.875.4613
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 2012-06-06 6:26, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 01:12 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: After having had some funny issues in the past due to there being two systemds (x86_64, i686) installed for some reason, something tells me that it's a bad idea to proceed with the update. Or am I wrong? Having two systemd packages installed isn't necessarily a problem, rpm's color concept on ELF objects should mean that x86_64 should win wherever the two packages' files collide, which should only be in /usr/*bin. It's still not the prettiest thing in the world, I admit; I'd be happier if there were a systemd-libs even if it were effectively not optional. Does rpm handle binaries' colors everywhere, or just in selected locations? I'm especially curious about /usr/lib. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 06/06/2012 05:39 PM, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
Come to think of it... shouldn't the rules that come with a package be
in /lib/udev/rules.d?
Yes, but add the /usr prefix: %{_prefix}/lib/udev/rules.d/
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 06/06/2012 05:52 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: Does rpm handle binaries' colors everywhere, or just in selected locations? I'm especially curious about /usr/lib. I don't know the answer in the general case, but it definitely works for binaries in /usr/lib/systemd/. No conflicts are reported when installing systemd for both archs and all ELFs there come out as 64-bit as they should. Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 06/06/2012 07:25 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
We will split out a systemd-libs subpackage to be more multilib-friendly.
That said, we are not aware of any specific issues with having both
systemd.{x86_64,i686} installed.
As long as systemd.rpm has content that is platform-dependent, then
it is likely that there will be overlap in some files; in this
case, such as x86_64 and i686 versions of the same binary executable
file. In theory the rpm feature of executable flavors should resolve
such an overlap (in favor of .x86_64 in this case), but this feature
relies on the corresponding .x86_64 and .i686 packages always having
the same n-v-r. The mirror system isn't that reliable [I see a sync
failure a few times per year], so the dreaded yum error protected
multilib versions likely will occur.
--
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:30:57AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 6/4/12 9:52 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
We merged the upstream udev repository entirely into the systemd
repository. There is no standalone upstream udev project anymore.
The version of systemd which includes udev has landed in rawhide a
couple of days ago. Fedora 18 will not have a udev.rpm, no libudev.rpm
and no libudev-devel.rpm.
I think we can also take this to mean that an explicit:
Requires: udev
is now redundant? In which case the following (F17) packages can be
cleaned up:
% repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora --qf=%{sourcerpm}
--whatrequires udev | sort -u
xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.6.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-12.8.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.14.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
done.
Cheers,
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 06/05/2012 03:52 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
Systemd includes libudev.so.1, while the old libudev.rpm provided
libudev.so.0. Therefore, all packages using udev need to be rebuilt.
Here's a list of owners with packages that currently require
libudev.so.0 in Rawhide.
# repoquery --whatrequires libudev.so.0 --qf '%{sourcerpm}' | rev | cut
-f3- -d- | rev | sort | uniq | fedoradev-pkgowners | sort | column -t
ajax libdrm
bskeggsxorg-x11-drv-nouveau
davidz udisks
lennartlibatasmart
lennartlibcanberra
lennartpulseaudio
libvirt-maint libvirt
lvm-team lvm2
pgfolpc-kbdshim
rdieterqt-mobility
rhughesweston
rrelyeapcsc-lite
twaugh system-config-printer
udev-maint udev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 6/4/12 9:52 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
We merged the upstream udev repository entirely into the systemd
repository. There is no standalone upstream udev project anymore.
The version of systemd which includes udev has landed in rawhide a
couple of days ago. Fedora 18 will not have a udev.rpm, no libudev.rpm
and no libudev-devel.rpm.
I think we can also take this to mean that an explicit:
Requires: udev
is now redundant? In which case the following (F17) packages can be
cleaned up:
% repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora --qf=%{sourcerpm}
--whatrequires udev | sort -u
aic94xx-firmware-30-3.fc17.src.rpm
alsa-firmware-1.0.25-1.fc17.src.rpm
alsa-tools-1.0.25-2.fc17.src.rpm
android-tools-20111220git1b251bd-2.fc17.src.rpm
ar9170-firmware-2009.05.28-4.fc17.src.rpm
argyllcms-1.3.6-2.fc17.src.rpm
b43-openfwwf-5.2-7.fc17.src.rpm
barry-0.17.1-7.fc17.src.rpm
bfa-firmware-3.0.0.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
biosdevname-0.3.11-6.fc17.src.rpm
bluez-4.98-3.fc17.src.rpm
btkbdd-1.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
clamtk-4.39-1.fc17.src.rpm
crda-1.1.2_2011.04.28-2.fc17.src.rpm
cups-1.5.2-12.fc17.src.rpm
device-mapper-multipath-0.4.9-25.fc17.src.rpm
dracut-018-35.git20120510.fc17.src.rpm
drbd-8.3.11-5.fc17.src.rpm
em8300-0.18.0-6.fc17.src.rpm
fbterm-1.6-5.fc17.src.rpm
fxload-2002_04_11-11.fc17.src.rpm
gpsd-3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm
hplip-3.12.4-2.fc17.src.rpm
i2c-tools-3.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
initscripts-9.37-1.fc17.src.rpm
iscan-firmware-2.26.4-2.fc17.src.rpm
isdn4k-utils-3.2-81.fc17.src.rpm
isight-firmware-tools-1.6-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl1000-firmware-39.31.5.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl100-firmware-39.31.5.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl5150-firmware-8.24.2.2-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000-firmware-9.221.4.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000g2a-firmware-17.168.5.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6000g2b-firmware-17.168.5.2-2.fc17.src.rpm
iwl6050-firmware-41.28.5.1-4.fc17.src.rpm
libconcord-0.23-9.fc17.src.rpm
libdrm-2.4.33-1.fc17.src.rpm
libertas-sd8686-firmware-9.70.20.p0-2.fc17.src.rpm
libftdi-0.19-3.fc17.src.rpm
libgpod-0.8.2-4.fc17.src.rpm
libguestfs-1.17.36-2.fc17.src.rpm
libmtp-1.1.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
libnjb-2.2.7-2.fc17.src.rpm
libosinfo-0.1.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
libphidget-2.1.8.20120123-1.fc17.src.rpm
libvirt-0.9.11.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
linux-firmware-20120206-0.3.git06c8f81.fc17.src.rpm
lvm2-2.02.95-6.fc17.src.rpm
MAKEDEV-3.24-10.fc17.src.rpm
mdadm-3.2.3-6.fc17.src.rpm
media-player-info-16-1.fc17.src.rpm
microcode_ctl-1.17-24.fc17.src.rpm
NetworkManager-0.9.4.0-7.git20120403.fc17.src.rpm
netxen-firmware-4.0.534-5.fc17.src.rpm
nut-2.6.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
olpc-utils-2.0.7-1.fc17.src.rpm
openct-0.6.20-3.fc17.src.rpm
openni-primesense-5.0.3.3-2.fc17.src.rpm
os-prober-1.53-1.fc17.src.rpm
ovirt-node-2.3.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
pcmciautils-018-2.fc17.src.rpm
pulseaudio-1.1-9.fc17.src.rpm
rdma-1.0-11.fc17.src.rpm
sane-backends-1.0.22-9.fc17.src.rpm
svxlink-11.11.1-4.fc17.src.rpm
synce-sync-engine-0.15.1-3.fc17.src.rpm
systemd-44-8.fc17.src.rpm
udev-182-1.fc17.src.rpm
udisks-1.0.4-6.fc17.src.rpm
udisks2-1.94.0-4.fc17.src.rpm
upower-0.9.16-1.fc17.src.rpm
usb_modeswitch-data-20111023-2.fc17.src.rpm
util-linux-2.21.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
v4l-utils-0.8.7-1.fc17.src.rpm
vdr-1.7.27-1.fc17.src.rpm
vdr-remote-0.4.0-19.fc17.src.rpm
xen-4.1.2-15.fc17.src.rpm
xorg-x11-drv-synaptics-1.6.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
xorg-x11-drv-vmmouse-12.8.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
xorg-x11-drv-wacom-0.14.0-2.fc17.src.rpm
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 6/5/12 10:33 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Here's a list of owners with packages that currently require
libudev.so.0 in Rawhide.
# repoquery --whatrequires libudev.so.0 --qf '%{sourcerpm}' | rev | cut
-f3- -d- | rev | sort | uniq | fedoradev-pkgowners | sort | column -t
ajax libdrm
bskeggs xorg-x11-drv-nouveau
davidz udisks
rhughes weston
Fixed.
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 6/4/12 9:52 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
We merged the upstream udev repository entirely into the systemd
repository. There is no standalone upstream udev project anymore.
The version of systemd which includes udev has landed in rawhide a
couple of days ago. Fedora 18 will not have a udev.rpm, no libudev.rpm
and no libudev-devel.rpm.
I think we can also take this to mean that an explicit:
Requires: udev
is now redundant? In which case the following (F17) packages can be cleaned
up:
% repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora --qf=%{sourcerpm}
--whatrequires udev | sort -u
argyllcms-1.3.6-2.fc17.src.rpm
clamtk-4.39-1.fc17.src.rpm
Fixed.
-J
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
On 06/05/2012 03:52 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: Systemd includes libudev.so.1, while the old libudev.rpm provided libudev.so.0. Therefore, all packages using udev need to be rebuilt. Here is what's happening on my x86_64 rawhide install which has some i686 packages (in particular, mesa) installed due to wine: #yum update mesa-libgbm [...] --- Package mesa-libgbm.i686 0:8.1-0.5.fc18 will be updated --- Package mesa-libgbm.x86_64 0:8.1-0.5.fc18 will be updated --- Package mesa-libgbm.i686 0:8.1-0.6.fc18 will be an update -- Processing Dependency: libudev.so.1(LIBUDEV_183) for package: mesa-libgbm-8.1-0.6.fc18.i686 -- Processing Dependency: libudev.so.1 for package: mesa-libgbm-8.1-0.6.fc18.i686 --- Package mesa-libgbm.x86_64 0:8.1-0.6.fc18 will be an update -- Running transaction check --- Package systemd.i686 0:185-2.fc18 will be installed After having had some funny issues in the past due to there being two systemds (x86_64, i686) installed for some reason, something tells me that it's a bad idea to proceed with the update. Or am I wrong? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rawhide: libudev version bump, merged into systemd, libudev user need rebuild
We merged the upstream udev repository entirely into the systemd repository. There is no standalone upstream udev project anymore. The version of systemd which includes udev has landed in rawhide a couple of days ago. Fedora 18 will not have a udev.rpm, no libudev.rpm and no libudev-devel.rpm. The libgudev1.rpm and libgudev1-devel.rpm are provides the same way as before and will still exist. Please remove all udev dependencies in packages which link against udev. They should now just use: Buildrequires: systemd-devel If a versioned dependency is needed, please use: Requires: systemd XXX The systemd version number jumped to the next version of the last release of udev, it is currently 185. Systemd includes libudev.so.1, while the old libudev.rpm provided libudev.so.0. Therefore, all packages using udev need to be rebuilt. These symbols are no longer provided by libudev.so.1: - udev_monitor_new_from_socket() custom application sockes are no longer supported by udevd, use the usual udev_monitor_from_netlink() - udev_queue_get_failed_list_entry() failed events are not recorded by udev since a long time, code that used this can just be removed - udev_get_dev_path() udev_get_sys_path() udev_get_run_path() systemd does not allow to configure any of these filesystem paths, they should simply be hard-coded and be replaced by /dev, /sys and /run/udev Thanks, Kay -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
