On 19.4.2015 г. 16:43, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On 17/04/15 21:42, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
Alright, I finally got it.
To whoever might be interested:
1. The default theme for gtk+ 2.24 under Windows has been changed [...]
2. The horizontal (only) notebook tabs backgrounds under MS-Windows is
On 17/04/15 21:42, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
On 16.4.2015 г. 23:36, Colomban Wendling wrote:
I can't seem to really change the colors when using the MS-Windows
theme, but I guess it's kinda expected some things aren't really
overridable with a native theme that uses the Windows theming API or
Am 16.04.2015 um 23:20 schrieb Colomban Wendling:
Is a pref necessary?
Yes.
In that case it's not the best solution and we should find an indication that
people don't want to outright disable.
The underline gets the job done but I'm not married to it. Can you suggest a
better alternative?
I don't mind some form of underline, highlight or something to
indicate the active tab, and as Thomas says, that future-proofs it if
one day we get slipt or multi windows.
It would be good if it had a pref so it could be turned off on those
platforms/themes that don't need it. Forcing something
On 16.4.2015 г. 23:36, Colomban Wendling wrote:
I can't seem to really change the colors when using the MS-Windows
theme, but I guess it's kinda expected some things aren't really
overridable with a native theme that uses the Windows theming API or
something.
But the vertical tabs still
On 16.4.2015 г. 03:41, Matthew Brush wrote:
On 15-04-15 10:15 AM, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
That's exactly what I'm talking about. The white horizontal line, which
normally gives nice outline [vertical_tabs], but is almost lost [...]
We could re-parent the Scintilla widget into a frame (or
Le 16/04/2015 19:15, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
On 16.4.2015 г. 14:41, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 15/04/2015 19:15, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
That's exactly what I'm talking about. The white horizontal line, which
normally gives nice outline [vertical_tabs], but is almost lost [...]
the white
On 16/04/15 21:51, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On 15/04/15 19:15, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
On 14.4.2015 г. 22:37, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On 13/04/15 19:33, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
In 2.24, the horizontal tabs under Win~1 have this flat or modern or
whatever look, and you can only distinguish the current
On 16/04/15 18:47, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
On 16.4.2015 г. 12:37, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 15.04.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Dimitar Zhekov:
That's exactly what I'm talking about. The white horizontal line,
which normally gives nice outline [vertical_tabs], but is almost [...]
due to the white editor
Am 16.04.2015 um 21:47 schrieb Enrico Tröger:
On 16/04/15 18:47, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
On 16.4.2015 г. 12:37, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 15.04.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Dimitar Zhekov:
That's exactly what I'm talking about. The white horizontal line,
which normally gives nice outline
On 15-04-16 02:20 PM, Colomban Wendling wrote:
Le 16/04/2015 23:14, Thomas Martitz a écrit :
Am 16.04.2015 um 21:47 schrieb Enrico Tröger:
On 16/04/15 18:47, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
On 16.4.2015 г. 12:37, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 15.04.2015 um 19:15 schrieb Dimitar Zhekov:
[…]
In my
On 15-04-15 10:15 AM, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
On 14.4.2015 г. 22:37, Enrico Tröger wrote:
On 13/04/15 19:33, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
In 2.24, the horizontal tabs under Win~1 have this flat or modern or
whatever look, and you can only distinguish the current tab via a slight
3D effect. And unlike
Le 12/04/2015 19:20, Dimitar Zhekov a écrit :
On 10.4.2015 г. 18:36, Colomban Wendling wrote:
waf: Fix the checks for openpty() on FreeBSD
ACK. Please, be sure to use the same check for debugger, it probably
needs it.
The same commits should already have altered both Scope and Debugger to
On 13.4.2015 г. 04:11, Matthew Brush wrote:
While on configuring, the README file still lists gtk+ 2.16 as a minimum
requirement for Geany - but it's actually 2.18 with GtkInfoBar now,
right?
I just merged PR #245[0], so 2.24 should be good version to use.
On 13.4.2015 г. 04:12, Lex Trotman
On 15-04-12 10:20 AM, Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
[snip]
While on configuring, the README file still lists gtk+ 2.16 as a minimum
requirement for Geany - but it's actually 2.18 with GtkInfoBar now,
right? I can cut an entire module (gtk216.[ch]) from Scope if 2.18 is
the minimum required version...
On 10.4.2015 г. 18:36, Colomban Wendling wrote:
waf: Fix the checks for openpty() on FreeBSD
ACK. Please, be sure to use the same check for debugger, it probably
needs it.
While on configuring, the README file still lists gtk+ 2.16 as a minimum
requirement for Geany - but it's actually
16 matches
Mail list logo
