Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Merge C and C++ Filetypes (no troll)

2016-01-07 Thread Lex Trotman
>> Power users can always add *.h back to C types but I think having it in >> C++ is a better default. >> > > Yes you're only changing the default. I just stated my opionion and won't > try to block the change. Go a head if you prefer. Agree, I shouldn't be defending C programmers over C++

Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Merge C and C++ Filetypes (no troll)

2016-01-07 Thread Jiří Techet
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: > Am 06.01.2016 um 21:12 schrieb Jiří Techet: > >> >> >> It's indeed at least interesting to consider, because at least for .h >> headers there really is some mixed stuff all over the place -- even, >> simply

Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Merge C and C++ Filetypes (no troll)

2016-01-07 Thread Jiří Techet
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: > On 8 January 2016 at 08:00, Jiří Techet wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Thomas Martitz > wrote: > >> > >> Am 06.01.2016 um 21:12 schrieb Jiří Techet: > >>> > >>> >

Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Merge C and C++ Filetypes (no troll)

2016-01-07 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 07.01.2016 um 23:00 schrieb Jiří Techet: On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Thomas Martitz > wrote: Am 06.01.2016 um 21:12 schrieb Jiří Techet: It's indeed at least interesting to consider, because at least for .h

Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Merge C and C++ Filetypes (no troll)

2016-01-06 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2016-01-06 12:23 PM, Thomas Martitz wrote: Am 06.01.2016 um 21:12 schrieb Jiří Techet: It's indeed at least interesting to consider, because at least for .h headers there really is some mixed stuff all over the place -- even, simply look in Scintilla's source tree. +1 for

Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Merge C and C++ Filetypes (no troll)

2016-01-06 Thread Thomas Martitz
Am 06.01.2016 um 21:12 schrieb Jiří Techet: It's indeed at least interesting to consider, because at least for .h headers there really is some mixed stuff all over the place -- even, simply look in Scintilla's source tree. +1 for having the headers parsed/lexed by the C++ parser

Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Merge C and C++ Filetypes (no troll)

2016-01-02 Thread Colomban Wendling
Oops, forgot the [1] > However, it being for build commands [1], or default extension, etc., > I'm not sure having one single "C and C++ headers and sources" is a > great idea. [1] I mostly agree stock build commands are seldom (if ever) useful with C and C++, but for the most basic "Hello

Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Merge C and C++ Filetypes (no troll)

2015-12-29 Thread Matthew Brush
On 2015-12-29 3:24 AM, Lex Trotman wrote: My only comment is to add to the point that the build commands are different. For example C that uses "template" as a variable won't compile with C++, a trap for beginners or existing code (just like Geany used to have). It's probably best that

Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Merge C and C++ Filetypes (no troll)

2015-12-29 Thread Lex Trotman
I'm not sure about the combination, would have to examine it further. My only comment is to add to the point that the build commands are different. For example C that uses "template" as a variable won't compile with C++, a trap for beginners or existing code (just like Geany used to have). But I

Re: [Geany-Devel] RFC: Merge C and C++ Filetypes (no troll)

2015-12-29 Thread Lex Trotman
On 29 December 2015 at 21:48, Matthew Brush wrote: > On 2015-12-29 3:24 AM, Lex Trotman wrote: >> >> My only comment is to add to the point that the build commands are >> different. For example C that uses "template" as a variable won't >> compile with C++, a trap for