From the Testing summary
Roadmap-3
Map of California came up, could move around easily.
Interesting timing. Thanks.
I'm about to go on a long drive and it would be fun to be able to watch where
I'm going on my XO. I've got a USB GPS device that shows up on lsusb as a
Prolific serial
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Here's a build of the F11 beta release for XO:
http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/rawhide-xo/f11-beta/
Instructions on flashing are at http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/rawhide-xo/.
How does this relate to the recent SoaS builds?
I am
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 12:13:36PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Here's a build of the F11 beta release for XO:
http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/rawhide-xo/f11-beta/
Instructions on flashing are at http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/rawhide-xo/.
How does this relate to the recent SoaS builds?
From the Fedora perspective this is the latest beta release
Is this statement meant to be equivalent to this is the latest F11
beta?
Now I read it, a fairly pointless statement should have coffee
_BEFORE_ replying to emails in the morning.
It has all the latest Sugar stuff in it but
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 01:05:39PM +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Here's a build of the F11 beta release for XO:
http://dev.laptop.org/~cjb/rawhide-xo/f11-beta/
Instructions on flashing are at
Hello
I couldn't find a lot of informations about firmware recompilation.
From what I've read, I think I can get it from
http://openbios.org/viewvc/?root=OpenFirmware
But how do I recompile it, to get a new .rom file ready to by flashed
? (the same question appears on
hal wrote:
From the Testing summary
Roadmap-3
Map of California came up, could move around easily.
Interesting timing. Thanks.
I'm about to go on a long drive and it would be fun to be able
to watch where I'm going on my XO. I've got a USB GPS device
that shows up on
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Martin Dengler mar...@martindengler.com wrote:
I'd test Soas-2 (what I'm running on my XO now). Just a personal
opinion.
Yeah, that's what I am thinking of doing. Is there stuff that is known
to be 'broken' on the XO?
IIRC, the NM there can't handle the mesh
Hi Martin,
How does this relate to the recent SoaS builds?
They're very similar, indeed. The rawhide-xo builds have both GNOME
and Sugar for you to choose between, and we can imagine putting an OLPC
kernel on to the XO builds to get better support, but otherwise they're
pretty identical.
-
I have made an outline for a google spreadsheet that tries to provide a
checklist of information about XO compatibility for various possible
distributions that an XO owner could choose to put on their hardware. Would
it be appropriate for knowledgeable persons to fill out this checklist for
the
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Mitch Bradley w...@laptop.org wrote:
ok flash disk:\q2e39a.rom
I should know this already, but... n00bIf the XO has been unlocked
with a developer key, will it accept unsigned firmware upgrades?/n
Yes. Develop key
Hi Chris,
Out of interest does OFW support ext4? I've tried today to get a SD
card to boot using your image with no luck, but shoved a usb key in
that has the standard F11 beta on it and the kernel booted straight up
but got no further.
Peter
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Chris Ball
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
Please disregard my frantic e-mails about the USB-Ethernet problem. It
turns out that the USB-Ethernet NIC was not at fault, even when using a
USB 1.1. USB-Ethernet. However, I would not recommend using it on the
LAN side,
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 11:16 +0200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
Please disregard my frantic e-mails about the USB-Ethernet problem. It
turns out that the USB-Ethernet NIC was not at fault, even when using a
USB 1.1.
14 matches
Mail list logo
