Installed 21009o2.zd in 2 XO-1.75 and on the one the fs failed to expand. fdisk
shows that the card is indeed 4GB and OFW warns in red writing that the image
is smaller than the device.
Anything I should be looking for specifically before I retry or after, if this
repeats?
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:59:39PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
Installed 21009o2.zd in 2 XO-1.75 and on the one the fs failed to
expand. fdisk shows that the card is indeed 4GB and OFW warns in red
writing that the image is smaller than the device.
Indeed, the Open Firmware warning is
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:41 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
Capture the kernel dmesg output after boot. Daniel added some
additional debugging lines to the resize logic, and these, if my
memory serves me, go into the kernel message log.
Capture the dmesg output, check that the
On May 6, 2012, at 11:59 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
Installed 21009o2.zd in 2 XO-1.75 and on the one the fs failed to expand.
fdisk shows that the card is indeed 4GB and OFW warns in red writing that the
image is smaller than the device.
I saw the exact same behavior with 21009o2.zd.
Hi,
I spent most of Friday and another 4 hours on Saturday working on the
arm-3.3 audio issue. The problem is that only silence is produced.
From what I can see the core of the problem is that the DAPM
(dynamic audio power management) code is passed a representation of
the widgets (amps, muxes,
groupinstall'ed Development Tools on 21009o2 and noticed 2 things.
Kernel-devel is 3.0.19_xo... but kernel-headers is 3.3.4-3.f17.
gcc-4.7.0-4 is an unsigned rpm.
Are these expected and OK to go on?
Thx
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote:
groupinstall'ed Development Tools on 21009o2 and noticed 2 things.
Kernel-devel is 3.0.19_xo... but kernel-headers is 3.3.4-3.f17.
gcc-4.7.0-4 is an unsigned rpm.
Are these expected and OK to go on?
Yeah, I
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
Thirdly, fsck is not magic. It cannot detect/repair all corruption. As
far as I know, we have not yet found a case of corruption which can be
meaningfully fixed by fsck. We did do quite a bit of testing for this
at an earlier
2012/5/6 Manuel Quiñones ma...@laptop.org:
2012/5/5 Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com:
The Yes yes lets try that again..without the oops release.
THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT RELEASE
Fixed bugs:
#11806 Browse: step scroll with the XO arrow keys in hand-held mode
#11766 systemd doesn't remount
Hi,
I'm trying to connect a LEGO RCX via the RCX 2.0 USB Tower. When plugging it
in, it gets listed with name and vendor in the messages log.
However, /dev/usb/lego0 is not created. The corresponding udev rule is
installed by Fedora's nqc rpm, but it relies on the legousbtower kernel
module.
bert wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to connect a LEGO RCX via the RCX 2.0 USB Tower. When plugging it
in, it gets listed with name and vendor in the messages log.
However, /dev/usb/lego0 is not created. The corresponding udev rule is
installed by Fedora's nqc rpm, but it relies on the
On 07.05.2012, at 18:19, Paul Fox wrote:
bert wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to connect a LEGO RCX via the RCX 2.0 USB Tower. When plugging it
in, it gets listed with name and vendor in the messages log.
However, /dev/usb/lego0 is not created. The corresponding udev rule is
installed by
bert wrote:
On 07.05.2012, at 18:19, Paul Fox wrote:
bert wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to connect a LEGO RCX via the RCX 2.0 USB Tower. When plugging
it
in, it gets listed with name and vendor in the messages log.
However, /dev/usb/lego0 is not created. The
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote:
groupinstall'ed Development Tools on 21009o2 and noticed 2 things.
Kernel-devel is 3.0.19_xo... but kernel-headers is 3.3.4-3.f17.
So, the 3.3.4 headers are fine for the 3.0.19 kernel?
Thx again
--- On Mon, 5/7/12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools
To: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
Cc: Yioryos Asprobounitis
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote:
So, the 3.3.4 headers are fine for the 3.0.19 kernel?
Yes for building userland stuff. Not for building kernel modules.
We aren't currently building kernel headers package splitoff. We should :-/
m
--
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
However, /dev/usb/lego0 is not created. The corresponding udev rule is
installed by Fedora's nqc rpm, but it relies on the legousbtower kernel
module.
Am I doing something wrong, or is it really just that the OLPC
On 08/05/12 07:51, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote:
So, the 3.3.4 headers are fine for the 3.0.19 kernel?
Yes for building userland stuff. Not for building kernel modules.
We aren't currently building kernel headers
Hi,
For the next 12.1.0 build I've just enabled the XO-1.75 serial console
by default in the kernel config.
We had disabled this earlier as we had linked it to suspend/resume
crashes, but we now believe that link to have been broken.
Enabling it again now should give us some good testing before
Saw this at Ubuntu UDS-Q today: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OHW Might be
of some use?
cheers,
Sameer
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
--- On Mon, 5/7/12, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: F17-ARM devel tools
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com, OLPC Devel
devel@lists.laptop.org
Date: Monday, May
21 matches
Mail list logo
