:) Good job!!
Claudia
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Bernie Innocenti
> wrote:
> > Our short-term goal is to meet a release criteria of "no
> > regressions against build 801". Once this is done, we'll re-sync with
> > the latest improv
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 12:02 +0100, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Can we agree on some naming scheme that distinguishes between
> F11-on-XO1.5 and F11-on-XO1? Having both named exactly the same is
> rather confusing.
Good point, I'll see what I can do.
> > * Add patent-encumbered multimedia codecs (gst
so follow the red hat scheme of .arch
OLPC/XObuildnumber.FC11.via.iso
and
.rpm?
Not that I have a personal XO 1.5
but got my greedly little hands on one
for FOSE demoing this week ;-/,
but alas it has to go back today,
and very little time to play with it,
much less install a testing build...
(act
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 02:47:33PM -0300, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
http://people.sugarlabs.org/bernie/olpc/f11-xo1-py/os115.img
http://people.sugarlabs.org/bernie/olpc/f11-xo1-py/os115.crc
http://people.sugarlabs.org/bernie/olpc/f11-xo1-py/os115.img.fs.zip
Can we agree on some naming scheme that
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> Our short-term goal is to meet a release criteria of "no
> regressions against build 801". Once this is done, we'll re-sync with
> the latest improvements from our upstreams, F11-XO1.5 and F11-XO1.
Bravo. To Stephen, to all the ParaguayEd
