On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Tim McNamara
paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote:
On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed
El Mon, 31-05-2010 a las 08:19 +1200, Tim McNamara escribió:
Just for my knowledge, does Fedora have an equivalent to Ubuntu's
long-term support releases?
Yes, it's called Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and it comes with commercial
support. If you want a free-beer equivalent with no guarantees,
It would be good to improve the situation, but as was discussed in the
past, yum does not seem to work very well on the XO. Manually tracking
the relevant upstream security updates would require some effort.
My own preference is to not work with static software - but to apply
as many updates
On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
for the XO-1. Our focus is stability and usability for
CentOS ?
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Tim McNamara
paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nzwrote:
On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Tim McNamara
paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote:
On 26 May 2010 06:16, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 23:12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Tue, 25-05-2010 a las 19:16 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
Is F-11 still the base OS for this?
Unfortunately, this build is still based on
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@tomeuvizoso.net wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 23:12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Tue, 25-05-2010 a las 19:16 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
Is
El Wed, 26-05-2010 a las 09:29 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
I'm happy to hear this. F14 may bring interesting changes for the XO1,
can we hope that support for the Geode won't have been dropped by
then?
There was a bug report [1] that was filed about it to do with glibc.
Since I last
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Wed, 26-05-2010 a las 09:29 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
I'm happy to hear this. F14 may bring interesting changes for the XO1,
can we hope that support for the Geode won't have been dropped by
then?
There
On 25 May 2010 18:12, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not entirely true. The was no changes in CPU support from F-12
to F-13. What has happened was a change in gcc which causes issues
with F-13 on geode processors. There's a bit missing from gcc for
geode support that would
El Wed, 26-05-2010 a las 12:00 -0300, Daniel Drake escribió:
As has been pointed out, there is some kernel code floating around
that is working in this direction. However, it's not totally correct
and the kernel developers want a more generic system rather than
something Geode-specific. And
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
for the XO-1. Our focus is stability and usability for deployments,
although we're also attempting to merge a couple of low-risk
On 05/25/2010 08:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocentiber...@codewiz.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
for the XO-1. Our focus is stability and usability for deployments,
although
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
On 05/25/2010 08:16 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Bernie Innocentiber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
Hello everyone,
we've just started a new development cycle aimed at providing Sugar 0.88
El Tue, 25-05-2010 a las 19:16 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
Is F-11 still the base OS for this?
Unfortunately, this build is still based on Fedora 11.
Fedora 13 dropped support for the Geode processor, so it's not an
option. Upgrading to Fedora 12 would be possible, but there are unsolved
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Tue, 25-05-2010 a las 19:16 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió:
Is F-11 still the base OS for this?
Unfortunately, this build is still based on Fedora 11.
Fedora 13 dropped support for the Geode processor, so it's
17 matches
Mail list logo
