On the tablet topic... I'm now wondering what it will take for the potential
of Android developers to be harnessed? (Assuming it will be a good thing)
Android Emerges as Big Rival to
iPadhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703630304575270761658543340.html?mod=WSJ_business_whatsNews
It was already discussed to death on the mailing lists. (The threads
derailed very fast so there was almost no discussion about important
things like the feasibility of a future Sugar - Android transition.)
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-June/015369.html
Putting some kittens at risk, it would be useful to have some analysis of
both the work involved and potential benefits to an Android port, a Qt port,
etc. I am not suggesting we divert our current efforts, as we are quite
lean, but a better understanding of these options would be useful in
On 05/28/2010 08:10 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
Putting some kittens at risk, it would be useful to have some analysis
of both the work involved and potential benefits to an Android port, a
Qt port, etc. I am not suggesting we divert our current efforts, as we
are quite lean, but a better
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote:
Putting some kittens at risk, it would be useful to have some analysis of
both the work involved and potential benefits to an Android port, a Qt port,
etc. I am not suggesting we divert our current efforts, as we are
You are correct. Android development is Java based. It is based on a subset
of Java functionality with the android API built on top of that.
If you want a QT based environment look at Meego http://meego.com/developers.
On May 28, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2010
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Robert Howard rihow...@rawbw.com wrote:
You are correct. Android development is Java based. It is based on a subset
of Java functionality with the android API built on top of that.
If you want a QT based environment look at Meego http://meego.com/developers.
Doubtless it would be painful... but...
openjdk _is_ open source.
Jython?
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:21 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com
rihowa...@gmail.comwrote:
You are correct. Android development is Java based. It is based on a
subset of Java functionality with the android API built on top of
Folks -
Below is the text version of the press release OLPC and Marvell issued this
morning, announcing our agreement to work together on the tablet-based efforts
we've been calling XO-3.0 and Marvell has been calling Moby (both
previously announced). The link takes you to the same document
For reference, please point people to our blog post on the subject,
which offers some context and clarifies the various soundbytes that
are being tossed around (which get confused about models and
timelines).
http://blog.laptop.org/2010/05/27/xo3-marvell-and-olpc/
(Ed, feel free to correct
10 matches
Mail list logo
