On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 19:05, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Like Michael pointed out, there are few people at OLPC who understand
and enjoy telepathy. I think this is an understatement. Personally, I
think that Collabora was very pressed to get something working on the
Tomeu and Marco,
For the history, both me and another student from MIT tried to implement
a connection manager back in January but gave up after a couple of
weeks, even with significant help from Daf. We don't claim to be expert
python programmers, but spending two weeks on something and still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| 2) Make provision in both sugar and activities so that there is a clear
| abstraction from telepathy so that _if_ a better collaboration stack
| comes along, telepathy won't be hardcoded in sugar. This mainly
|
Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| 2) Make provision in both sugar and activities so that there is a clear
| abstraction from telepathy so that _if_ a better collaboration stack
| comes along, telepathy won't be hardcoded in sugar. This mainly
| involves
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
| Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| | 2) Make provision in both sugar and activities so that there is a clear
| | abstraction from telepathy so that _if_ a better collaboration stack
Like Michael pointed out, there are few people at OLPC who understand
and enjoy telepathy. I think this is an understatement. Personally, I
think that Collabora was very pressed to get something working on the
laptop and the resulting presence stack looks like one hack on top of
another. For
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote:
| Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| | 2) Make provision in both sugar and activities so that there
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like Michael pointed out, there are few people at OLPC who understand and
enjoy telepathy. I think this is an understatement. Personally, I think
that Collabora was very pressed to get something working on the
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* The abstraction layer needs to be accessible to non-python
activities. Unless you want to expose it through DBus, you will have
Ricardo Carrano wrote:
We need Jabber to be working too. For the infra scenario in the schools to
work.
But if we consider Cerebro an important part of our future (at least I
do) we should dedicate more attention to it. I don't know about the
arrangements between OLPC and Collabora. It seems
We are discussing this and the best use of resources to get to 8.2.0 and
beyond. There will be many more discussions. I would like to figure out how
to make progress on cerebro.
Kim
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Robert McQueen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ricardo Carrano wrote:
We need
Ricardo Carrano wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos wrote:
| I thought we were talking about collaboration. MSN, IRC etc are
| basically chat protocols. Cerebro has little to do with such protocols;
| its goal is
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
I've got a concrete non-technical objection: kids at gamejams
invariably want to write a multiplayer game. Almost none succeed.
This tells me we need a better collaboration API.
You can argue that this simple API should be *on top* of the
lower-level telepathy (or
13 matches
Mail list logo
