On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 11:02:17PM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gary C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clearly, nobody is dogfooding.
(me too, +1, kkthxbye)
That'd be a great start.
I happen to think that Sugar's python files should be
kept in the journal.
On 4 Aug 2008, at 04:02, Albert Cahalan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gary C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is rather unfair. I take it you've just filled up all
available space
and jffs2 is now thrashing (as would happen on almost any file
system)?
df -m . reports
A conglomeration of responses follow...
Also, as a prologue, I will refer occasionally to the designs on the
wiki [1], and in particular the 6th slide [2] with respect to the
deletion issue. It's also prudent to note the initial description
of the Journal [3] which remains, in nearly all
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 18:03 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
Aaron Konstam writes:
Someone in a recent message suggested that people should learn to
routinely erase Journal entries to prevent the NAND from filling up.
Unless I have missed something that is a very tedious task to lay on
Aaron Konstam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unless I have missed something that is a very tedious task to lay on
someone using the current GUI interface for erasing journal entries.
In latest joyrides, is there a way to select all entries? (C-a)
This would be useful not only for deleting, but
Aaron Konstam writes:
Someone in a recent message suggested that people should learn to
routinely erase Journal entries to prevent the NAND from filling up.
Unless I have missed something that is a very tedious task to lay on
someone using the current GUI interface for erasing journal
Hi Albert,
On 3 Aug 2008, at 23:03, Albert Cahalan wrote:
I gave up. My journal has 1150 entries, 99% spam.
I'm at about 900 or so after 4 months.
I don't even want to look in the journal. Not ever! It's unusable.
It's worse than the worst email inbox nightmare. Nothing has a useful
name,
There could be a default (favorite) filter for the journal entries.
I'd suggest something based on time: the more recent the entry, the
more likely it's you want to resume it.
Such a notion would also nicely combine with the notion of favs in
the home view. And maybe it's not that hard to
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gary C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3 Aug 2008, at 23:03, Albert Cahalan wrote:
This is rather unfair. I take it you've just filled up all available space
and jffs2 is now thrashing (as would happen on almost any file system)?
df -m . reports 1024 blocks,
