On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:13 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> 802.11s is not simple, nor safe.
lol. That's right.
Now, you are talking about DNS-SD without mDNS. Spent some good time
reading up on both, and DNS-SD sounds good for what we're trying to
do. Everybody uses them together, however, and a
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:17 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel5/4489030/4489031/04489571.pdf?temp=x
I don't want adventure. I want something old and safe ;-)
Maybe
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:17 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>>> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel5/4489030/4489031/04489571.pdf?temp=x
>>>
>>> I don't want adventure. I want something old and safe ;-)
>>>
>>> Maybe we can fak
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:17 AM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel5/4489030/4489031/04489571.pdf?temp=x
>>
>> I don't want adventure. I want something old and safe ;-)
>>
>> Maybe we can fake this with good old DNS lookups - but those will fail
>> if th
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:39 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>> My suggestions: DNS-SD and libepc (http://live.gnome.org/libepc/).
>> There's no need for Sugar-specific solutions here; we just need to use
>> existing standard solutions.
>
> Yep
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:39 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> My suggestions: DNS-SD and libepc (http://live.gnome.org/libepc/).
> There's no need for Sugar-specific solutions here; we just need to use
> existing standard solutions.
Yep - I want existing standard stuff, but the devil we know seems t
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>> So this depends on a simple service-announcement scheme. I'll sidestep
>> the how of it, and say:
>
> In terms of getting a service announcement scheme, I'd be happy to
> work with
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Martin Langhoff
wrote:
> So this depends on a simple service-announcement scheme. I'll sidestep
> the how of it, and say:
In terms of getting a service announcement scheme, I'd be happy to
work with you guys to find a lightweight svc announcement scheme that
works
