Was able to use the XO-1.5 (os32) at another location, connected
without a proxy. My opinion - this is a quite nice machine.
The principal user-perception experience where improvement would
still be welcome is video support. Changes to the screen (e.g.,
show/hide Frame) are not being done
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 16:44, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Was able to use the XO-1.5 (os32) at another location, connected without a
proxy. My opinion - this is a quite nice machine.
The principal user-perception experience where improvement would still be
welcome is video support.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 17:52, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 16:44, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
Was able to use the XO-1.5 (os32) at another location, connected without a
proxy. My opinion - this is a quite nice machine.
The principal
Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
Was able to use the XO-1.5 (os32) at another location, connected
without a proxy.
I don't quite understand this statement. Were you connected to the XO-1.5
over the internet, using a technique like X forwarding or VNC?
The principal user-perception experience where
Some more comments from recent use and demos of my 1.5 w/ os32, some
of which I'll put into trac.
1) Twice in half an hour I was able to get Sugar to stop redrawing
when, while it had 5-6 activities open, someone hovered over the XO on
the desktop to pull up the config menu. The menu would open,
My experience with the XO-1.5 has been much better:
4) Both Browse and Firefox on Gnome don't load certain popular sites
(see below).
I don't go to Gnome - I run both Browse and Firefox under Sugar.
Neither Browse nor Firefox had any trouble whatsoever with either of
those sites (Skype,
Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
My experience with the XO-1.5 has been much better:
[...] snip!
2) Infoslicer always claimed it couldn't reach the network
Did not run Infoslicer when away from home - so haven't tried it.
I heard this was a known issue - the Wikipedia folks changed apparently
some
