Hi Luke,
On Sunday 16 November 2008 04:14, Luke Faraone wrote:
Something strange when installing/removing packages under the base
installation:
http://pastebin.ca/1254906
This warning/error also occured when I was using the olpc-update debian
installation.
you can fix this by running
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 07:14:23PM -0800, Luke Faraone wrote:
Andres Salomon-4 wrote:
- A new 'base' desktop has been added. This is a minimal install,
with no graphics or X at all. It's good for rescue situations, or
where you have a local package mirror and don't want to waste
On 2008-11-17, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe you can resolve these warnings by running the locale-gen
utility.
I had already run that, and the discouraging results pasted in the top
of the pastebin.
-lf
___
Devel mailing list
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:42:17PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-11-17, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe you can resolve these warnings by running the locale-gen
utility.
I had already run that, and the discouraging results pasted in the top
of the pastebin.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 15:04, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:42:17PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-11-17, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe you can resolve these warnings by running the locale-gen
utility.
I had already
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:43:27PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 15:04, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:42:17PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-11-17, Erik Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe you can resolve
when installing/removing packages under the base
installation:
http://pastebin.ca/1254906
This warning/error also occured when I was using the olpc-update debian
installation.
--
View this message in context:
http://n2.nabble.com/debxo-0.3-release-tp1392012p1504816.html
Sent from the OLPC
luke wrote:
Andres Salomon-4 wrote:
- A new 'base' desktop has been added. This is a minimal install,
with no graphics or X at all. It's good for rescue situations, or
where you have a local package mirror and don't want to waste bandwidth
downloading a graphical desktop
Hey all,
tidbits:
http://olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=2240.msg26267;topicseen#msg26267
* working power management(tested)
modprobe olpc_battery
* enables battery level detection - grab battery-status script from an XO
running 8.2
sudo ifconfig eth0 up
* makes the eth0 interface show up if
ian wrote:
Hey all,
tidbits:
http://olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=2240.msg26267;topicseen#msg26267
* working power management(tested)
modprobe olpc_battery
* enables battery level detection - grab battery-status script from an XO
running 8.2
sudo ifconfig eth0 up
* makes
RE Suspend / Resume : talk to CJB(Chris Ball) about OHM. I spoke with him a
few weeks ago and, if I recall correctly, all one needs to do is use the
official OLPC Kernel and install the OHM packages.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, James Cameron
This sounds right. The OHM packages aren't in any debian repo afaik, so
we'll have to package them. Then we'd need a debian repository for
these packages.
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:53:40AM -0500, Ian Daniher wrote:
RE Suspend / Resume : talk to CJB(Chris Ball) about OHM. I spoke with him a
thanks for doing this. I never thought that putting KDE or Gnome on any
system would seem like a speedup, but it definantly does.
so now that the basic system is working, where do I get started to enable
the less common features of the XO?
specificly
1. controlling the backlight (and therefor
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:44:14 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for doing this. I never thought that putting KDE or Gnome on
any system would seem like a speedup, but it definantly does.
so now that the basic system is working, where do I get started to
enable the less common
andres wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:44:14 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for doing this. I never thought that putting KDE or Gnome on
any system would seem like a speedup, but it definantly does.
so now that the basic system is working, where do I get started to
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
andres wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:44:14 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for doing this. I never thought that putting KDE or Gnome on
any system would seem like a speedup, but it definantly does.
so now that the basic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
i suggest searching olpcnews.com/forum for things like this -- last year's
g1g1 users have done a lot of work supporting the XO h/w under non-sugary
environments.
well, I was hoping that with an open
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, I was hoping that with an open hardware platform running opensource
software there would not be a need to search forums for reverse engineered
'secrets' or 'hacks', but instead such information would be readily
available (ideally already documented,
I
Hello all,
I have a collection of useful XO scripts at daniher.com/shscripts/.
Anything in the format of conf.* is a media-setup script.
While /extremely/ useful, consider everything beta with no warranty explicit
or implicit.
The script titled b is one you want to look at - b 0 will set the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you might start with this:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Xfce_keybindings
which contains a few of the things you're looking for.
Also , Screen Brightness/Rotation, Sound Volume, and Battery Status
Control in http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XFCE references olpc-keybind and
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
i suggest searching olpcnews.com/forum for things like this -- last year's
g1g1 users have done a lot of work supporting the XO h/w under non-sugary
environments.
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mic input (kmix sees the sound device, including DC input mode, which I
didn't expect, but I haven't sucessfully recorded anything yet)
I found that I had the mic muted. once that was changed I got feedback :-)
everthing seems to be supported by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on a traditional PC keyboard, the keypad area to the right
contains duplicate arrow, pgup/down and home/end keys that are
operational when numlock is not in effect. the gamepad produces
the same keycodes
things that I can see as possibly needed:
hardware encryption engine (does this show up to the kernel as an
available encryption device? (it would be handy if at least the
development builds of the kernel enabled /proc/config.gz for all xo
distros (including the OLPC builds) it costs about
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on a traditional PC keyboard, the keypad area to the right
contains duplicate arrow, pgup/down and home/end keys that are
operational when numlock is not in effect.
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008, John Gilmore wrote:
things that I can see as possibly needed:
hardware encryption engine (does this show up to the kernel as an
available encryption device? (it would be handy if at least the
development builds of the kernel enabled /proc/config.gz for all xo
distros
The TODO file in the xodist git repository has a hardware enablement
section that I added last week, which covers some of the things this
thread has discussed.
-- cut --
hardware enablement
---
keymap for the extra keyboard keys and game buttons
key to right of esc,
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, James Cameron wrote:
The TODO file in the xodist git repository has a hardware enablement
section that I added last week, which covers some of the things this
thread has discussed.
link to xodist please?
keymap for the extra keyboard keys and game buttons
key to
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 09:27:52PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, James Cameron wrote:
The TODO file in the xodist git repository has a hardware enablement
section that I added last week, which covers some of the things this
thread has discussed.
link to xodist please?
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, James Cameron wrote:
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 09:27:52PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, James Cameron wrote:
The TODO file in the xodist git repository has a hardware enablement
section that I added last week, which covers some of the things this
Or, as I found out, if you have the developer key on a pen drive, you
can boot into debxo from that, and copy develop.sig into
/boot/security/, and have security enabled and debxo at the same time,
should you want to.
Thanks, all. I'll see what I can do about creating a wiki page if there
kawk wrote:
Or, as I found out, if you have the developer key on a pen drive, you
can boot into debxo from that, and copy develop.sig into
/boot/security/, and have security enabled and debxo at the same time,
should you want to.
Thanks, all. I'll see what I can do about creating a wiki
Every time I try one of the debxo 0.3 or debxo 0.2 JFFS2 images, I get
the error message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:75: Error writing to NAND FLASH and
it fails.
From 0.3, I've tried JFFS2 base and kde, and from 0.2 I've tried KDE.
Same error message.
I've re-downloaded the images, tried a md5sum on
Hi,
Every time I try one of the debxo 0.3 or debxo 0.2 JFFS2 images, I
get the error message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:75: Error writing to NAND
FLASH and it fails.
You need to upgrade Open Firmware to q2e20.
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 03:10:08PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
Every time I try one of the debxo 0.3 or debxo 0.2 JFFS2 images, I
get the error message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:75: Error writing to NAND
FLASH and it fails.
You need to upgrade Open Firmware to q2e20.
You can do so
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 03:26:35PM -0400, Erik Garrison wrote:
You can do so by downloading
http://dev.laptop.org/pub/firmware/q2e20/q2e20.rom to a usb key, booting
into the the OFW prompt, and typing:
flash disk:q2e20.rom
You can also do this from the OFW prompt without using any USB
I have updated the firmware to Q2E20, and that error message is gone. Instead,
once its complete, and I try to boot into debxo, it gives me a sad face and
powers off after 10 seconds. Is this because it's an unsigned build, and I have
no devel key after the reflash? If so, how can I put a devel
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:52:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have updated the firmware to Q2E20, and that error message is gone.
Instead, once its complete, and I try to boot into debxo, it gives me
a sad face and powers off after 10 seconds. Is this because it's an
unsigned build, and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have updated the firmware to Q2E20, and that error message is gone.
Instead, once its complete, and I try to boot into debxo, it gives me a sad
face and powers off after 10 seconds. Is this because it's an unsigned build,
and I have no devel key after the reflash?
Hi,
Here's a (mostly) bugfix release of DebXO. There was a nasty bug
related to JFFS2 and kernel upgrades in 0.2; this release fixes it.
Note that there's a known bug on first boot with the gnome install on
JFFS2. A warning will pop up due to dbus not starting quickly enough.
This can safely be
40 matches
Mail list logo
