Re: more on trac

2009-12-02 Thread James Cameron
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:21:55PM +1100, James Cameron wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:27:41PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: 2 - bugs on released

Re: more on trac

2009-11-21 Thread James Cameron
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: 1 - tasks bugs going forward -- filed mainly by the techteam and some dedicated volunteers that test our builds Yes, that's what I'm concentrating on. 2 - bugs on released versions -- filed by volunteer testers _and by our end

Re: more on trac

2009-11-21 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: 1 - tasks bugs going forward -- filed mainly by the techteam and some dedicated volunteers that test our builds Yes, that's what I'm concentrating on.

Re: more on trac

2009-11-21 Thread James Cameron
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:27:41PM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:23 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 09:38:20AM +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: 1 - tasks bugs going forward -- filed mainly by the techteam and some dedicated

more on trac

2009-11-20 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, Here are some changes to trac that I suggest. I know that this is still work in progress. 1. Retriage the 11 open tickets in 1.5-hardware-B and close that milestone. We've already gone into B-production. 2. We recently closed some old milestones like 8.2.0 but there are still many tickets

Re: more on trac

2009-11-20 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:40:52AM +, Daniel Drake wrote: 1. Retriage the 11 open tickets in 1.5-hardware-B and close that milestone. We've already gone into B-production. Agreed. 2. We recently closed some old milestones like 8.2.0 but there are still many tickets open in them. Move all

Re: more on trac

2009-11-20 Thread Daniel Drake
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 21:50 +1100, James Cameron wrote: 2. We recently closed some old milestones like 8.2.0 but there are still many tickets open in them. Move all those open tickets to Not triaged. I'm unsure about this one. If the problems can be reproduced on XO-1.5 with F11, yes.

Re: more on trac

2009-11-20 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 21:50 +1100, James Cameron wrote: 2. We recently closed some old milestones like 8.2.0 but there are still many tickets open in them. Move all those open tickets to Not triaged. I'm unsure about this

Re: more on trac

2009-11-20 Thread Daniel Drake
One more: I think 1.5-software-future should be renamed to 1.5-future. We can't put a date on this milestone and I don't think theres a value of splitting our medium-term goals into hardware/software/firmware as we already do that with the component field. And I propose this description for the

Re: more on trac

2009-11-20 Thread Daniel Drake
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 13:12 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: Yes, please. I am planning to open a '8.2.3' milestone with all the bugs using keyword 'ml8.2.3' currently. Maintenance of old releases is important for very large deployments. Great! What happened to 8.2.2? We actually already have a

Re: more on trac

2009-11-20 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 13:12 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote: Yes, please. I am planning to open a '8.2.3' milestone with all the bugs using keyword 'ml8.2.3' currently. Maintenance of old releases is important for very large

Re: more on trac

2009-11-20 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:14:38PM +, Daniel Drake wrote: One more: I think 1.5-software-future should be renamed to 1.5-future. We can't put a date on this milestone and I don't think theres a value of splitting our medium-term goals into hardware/software/firmware as we already do that