Re: XO memory size

2009-02-26 Thread James Cameron
After generating an xorg.conf using Xorg -configure, restarting X, results were 3.696s, 3.700s, 3.607s. After adding 'Option FBSize 8388608', restarting X, results were 3.673s, 3.636s, 3.658s. The generated xorg.conf is attached. I'm not seeing what you're seeing. Perhaps there is something

Re: Journal empty in Soas-200902231225 and what is Soas-200902241809.iso in snapshots/2/ ?

2009-02-26 Thread Simon Schampijer
Ton van Overbeek wrote: When trying out Soas-200902231225 the journal stays empty. Anybody else seen this ? Also in http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ there is now a Soas-200902241809.iso. What is this ? Is there a changelog or buildlog somewhere for the various Soas

Re: XO memory size

2009-02-26 Thread Derek Zhou
On Wednesday 25 February 2009 11:52:11 pm James Cameron wrote: debxo 0.5 KDE variant booted from USB, installed rxvt, started rxvt -fn 12x24, maximised, took a sample log (dmesg) which was 523 lines, appended it many times to generate a file 7322 lines long, then used: time cat file

Re: Journal empty in Soas-200902231225 and what is Soas-200902241809.iso in snapshots/2/ ?

2009-02-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:11, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Ton van Overbeek wrote: When trying out Soas-200902231225 the journal stays empty. Anybody else seen this ? Also in http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ there is now a Soas-200902241809.iso. What is this ?

Re: XO memory size

2009-02-26 Thread Derek Zhou
On Thursday 26 February 2009 12:02:46 am James Cameron wrote: After generating an xorg.conf using Xorg -configure, restarting X, results were 3.696s, 3.700s, 3.607s. After adding 'Option FBSize 8388608', restarting X, results were 3.673s, 3.636s, 3.658s. The generated xorg.conf is

Re: XO memory size

2009-02-26 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:19, Derek Zhou agonyz...@comcast.net wrote: On Wednesday 25 February 2009 11:52:11 pm James Cameron wrote: debxo 0.5 KDE variant booted from USB, installed rxvt, started rxvt -fn 12x24, maximised, took a sample log (dmesg) which was 523 lines, appended it many times

Re: OS/X11 support for XO-1 hardware?

2009-02-26 Thread NoiseEHC
If you need it for some game then here is how to do it: attached. A little question to Jordan Crouse or anybody else who can answer. Here Jodran told me that the Geode can do XV flipping: http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2007-May/005208.html It can be that he either did not reflect to

Re: OS/X11 support for XO-1 hardware?

2009-02-26 Thread Peter Robinson
I had thought this capability would be coming with the Fedora 10 move in 9.1.0.  With that release now scuttled, I'm wondering more generally, are these pieces being picked up anywhere? Well its not really scuttled, there will still be a equivalent release at around the time that 9.1.0 was

Re: TamTam

2009-02-26 Thread Bert Freudenberg
On 26.02.2009, at 03:34, Caroline Meeks wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31L9qaxOrp0 This is a great demo! I'm trying it on Sugar on a Stick. It works well. Except I can't find a mic button nor can I see how to get to synth through an edit button as demonstrated in the video.

Re: Journal empty in Soas-200902231225 and what is Soas-200902241809.iso in snapshots/2/ ?

2009-02-26 Thread Ton van Overbeek
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Ton van Overbeek wrote: When trying out Soas-200902231225 the journal stays empty. Anybody else seen this ? Also in http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ there is now a Soas-200902241809.iso. What is

Re: Journal empty in Soas-200902231225 and what is Soas-200902241809.iso in snapshots/2/ ?

2009-02-26 Thread Simon Schampijer
Ton van Overbeek wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Ton van Overbeek wrote: When trying out Soas-200902231225 the journal stays empty. Anybody else seen this ? Also in http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/2/ there is now a

Re: [Sugar-devel] OS/X11 support for XO-1 hardware?

2009-02-26 Thread pgf
benjamin m. schwartz wrote: There are lots of good reasons to play with screen resolution. My favorite reason is that reducing the resolution to 800x600 would make all graphical operations runs twice as fast, and use half as much memory, while introducing a negligible drop in display

Re: TamTam

2009-02-26 Thread Wade Brainerd
Why was it broken up, BTW? Can it be put back together? :) It's always been confusing to me how the parts interact. On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.dewrote: On 26.02.2009, at 03:34, Caroline Meeks wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31L9qaxOrp0

Re: [Server-devel] Moodle on XS Install

2009-02-26 Thread Dave Bauer
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.comwrote: 2009/2/26 Dave Bauer d...@solutiongrove.com: I am using XS 0.5.1 beta. On there the moodle instance is not comfigured. Should I expect it to work out of the box or are there additional steps I need to take to

Re: OS/X11 support for XO-1 hardware?

2009-02-26 Thread Chris Marshall
Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: da...@lang.hm wrote: It would allow for much improved video performance since you could play back a 320x240 video on the full screen at considerable CPU savings. except that you would spend those CPU savings doing the scaling up from 320x240 to the higher

Re: [Server-devel] xs-activation-server over IPv6

2009-02-26 Thread Daniel Drake
2009/2/9 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com: On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: So initially I am going with #1-- do you think you can tweak the initrd a bit more to poke at ef01 over mesh, and ef02 over abg? Looking at activate.py, adding

Re: ActivityTeam meeting

2009-02-26 Thread Matthew Fredrick
i'll be there if I can connect through my work's internet filter. hopefully i can find a little time and churn out more svgs -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/ActivityTeam-meeting-tp2376013p2391377.html Sent from the Software development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: XO memory size

2009-02-26 Thread david
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Derek Zhou wrote: On Thursday 26 February 2009 12:02:46 am James Cameron wrote: After generating an xorg.conf using Xorg -configure, restarting X, results were 3.696s, 3.700s, 3.607s. After adding 'Option FBSize 8388608', restarting X, results were 3.673s, 3.636s,

Re: OS/X11 support for XO-1 hardware?

2009-02-26 Thread S Page
Hal Murray wrote: Is there anything I can do on my XO running terminal so that when I ssh to another system and run a text based X program the fonts will come out useable without a magnifying glass? If you RTFA, http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Terminal_Activity has a Change font size in the

Re: XO memory size

2009-02-26 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 01:16:24AM -0800, Derek Zhou wrote: On Thursday 26 February 2009 12:02:46 am James Cameron wrote: I'm not seeing what you're seeing. Perhaps there is something else affecting your system. Agreed. Now instead of a logfile which is different from computer to

Re: XO memory size

2009-02-26 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:18:46AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: As a wild guess, may be related to jffs2? It may be garbage collecting at that time or some other stuff. Agreed, that is a possibility. I'm avoiding that by installing afresh, not filling up the free space, doing nothing else on the

xs-dev disk full?

2009-02-26 Thread Martin Langhoff
/srv is full on xsdev. I'll do some temporary shuffling around of my stuff to clear up enough room to do what I need to do... ... whoever looks after the build scripts that hog it (is it joyride builds?) better do some decent programming to handle the on-disk footprint better _or_ some storage

Re: XO memory size

2009-02-26 Thread James Cameron
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:50:58PM -0800, da...@lang.hm wrote: since the effect seems to be related to the amount of text on the screen at any one time that needs to be scrolled, it may be that the larger fonts of debxo 0.5 are preventing you from seeing the effect. Good point, but no, rxvt

Re: xs-dev disk full?

2009-02-26 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: ... whoever looks after the build scripts that hog it So, found a crontab entry hiding in root's entry, commented out so no more joyride for the time being. I'm not sure about the hw on that box before that script

Re: xs-dev disk full?

2009-02-26 Thread Martin Langhoff
Right, so I've - moved some silly logs (do we need them?) from /srv/library/mirror/log to /var/tmp/mirror-logs - compressed the logs of the joyride builds this has freed up some 345MB and I can work with that. A little bit at least. Now, when I say better do some decent programming to

Re: XO memory size

2009-02-26 Thread david
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, James Cameron wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:50:58PM -0800, da...@lang.hm wrote: since the effect seems to be related to the amount of text on the screen at any one time that needs to be scrolled, it may be that the larger fonts of debxo 0.5 are preventing you from

Re: XO memory size

2009-02-26 Thread Derek Zhou
On Thursday 26 February 2009 05:09:27 pm James Cameron wrote: Something is wrong with my olpc in either the xserver or hardware. For other non-drawing tasks its speed seems to be reasonable. Yes, something is wrong. Have you another XO you can test? I installed latest

[Server-devel] What's cooking in the XS pot, support, and important news

2009-02-26 Thread Martin Langhoff
Several bits of news and updates. *Development* - Today I am checking 0.5.2-dev01 and respin things so a -dev02 has all the bits we want. - Moodle track - this is what I am working on at the moment, automagic auth and the general make moodle just work and moodle-ejabberd integration. -

[Server-devel] xs-dev disk full?

2009-02-26 Thread Martin Langhoff
/srv is full on xsdev. I'll do some temporary shuffling around of my stuff to clear up enough room to do what I need to do... ... whoever looks after the build scripts that hog it (is it joyride builds?) better do some decent programming to handle the on-disk footprint better _or_ some storage

Re: [Server-devel] xs-dev disk full?

2009-02-26 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: ... whoever looks after the build scripts that hog it So, found a crontab entry hiding in root's entry, commented out so no more joyride for the time being. I'm not sure about the hw on that box before that script

Re: [Server-devel] xs-dev disk full?

2009-02-26 Thread Martin Langhoff
Right, so I've - moved some silly logs (do we need them?) from /srv/library/mirror/log to /var/tmp/mirror-logs - compressed the logs of the joyride builds this has freed up some 345MB and I can work with that. A little bit at least. Now, when I say better do some decent programming to

Re: [Server-devel] Please test - XS-0.5.2-dev01

2009-02-26 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: 2009/2/26 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com: Grab the 0.5.2-dev01 iso from http://xs-dev.laptop.org/xs/other/  - @online@ should now work - please test with